Re: IS TIME REAL?

From: TomGee (lvlus_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/14/04 

Date: 14 Oct 2004 06:14:37 -0700

"AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote in message news:<evWdnUjTsrWwUPfcRVn-pw@conversent.net>...
>
> The original question was whether or not time was a fundamental property of
> nature, and the follow up assertion was that it was not observable in the
> same sense that distance, temperature, velocity, and mass, just to name a
> few, are observable.

So what was the answer, yes or no? I contend that time is a property
of matter and that it passes faster or slower for discrete objects or
systems depending upon their states of motion within the universe.
TomGee
101404

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IS TIME REAL?
    ... >> The original question was whether or not time was a fundamental property of ... >> nature, and the follow up assertion was that it was not observable in the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
    ... So ok we have now defined Murf, as a fundamental property of nature. ... Or, one crow is talking to another crow, and he says you know what ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast