Re: Ideas please?
stephen_at_nomail.com
Date: 10/20/04
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Newby - Don't Shoot"
- Previous message: David McAnally: "Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Ideas please?"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Ideas please?"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Ideas please?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Oct 2004 15:39:24 GMT
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote:
: Dear LeeRyder:
: "LeeRyder" <leeryder@hotmail.com> wrote in message
: news:e3b0f0b5.0410162343.35ac22b3@posting.google.com...
:> OK thanks you two for your feedback:
:>
:> First, Im not sure what the psychology of this site has to do with my
:> site? I see alot of intelligent people here... but alot of twerps that
:> do nothing but flame. So that part I want to avoid.
: Two things:
: 1) Don't top post. It is rude, and it doesn't read well upon later review
: (this site is archived).
: 2) Flamers happen. Develop a method to handle it/them. You are proposing
: a public forum, and some of the pubLic is missing the "L" if you catch my
: drift.
And a third thing. This is not a site. It is a newsgroup.
Stephen
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Newby - Don't Shoot"
- Previous message: David McAnally: "Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Ideas please?"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Ideas please?"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Ideas please?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
