Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

From: Roger Pearse (roger_pearse_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 10/20/04 

Date: 20 Oct 2004 13:02:38 -0700

"George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote in message news:<MJOdnQOrlcMOsOvcRVn-og@comcast.com>...
> "Roger Pearse" <roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3a88eeea.0410190933.67fc034c@posting.google.com...
> > bv_schornak <nowhere@schornak.de> wrote in message
> news:<cktv8o$rt0$02$1@news.t-online.com>...
[Huge post]

Not certain that it was absolutely necessary to quote all this?

> [Hammond]
> I find this discussion to most informative. There seems to be a distinct
> lack
> of knowlege about "Roman religion" before the Christian era in the public
> mind. Schornak's comments about the "solar religions" of Rome are most
> informative, especially the fact that Constantine was a devotee of the
> Sol Invictius religion.

I think it is mistaken to treat the pagan worship of Sol Invictus as
if it was a separate religion, tho.

> All religions ultimately, as we now know from SPoG, are symbolic or
> metaphorical descriptions of the "ungrown brain" of Man which produces
> the perceptual phenomena known today as "God".

Surely this argument likewise disposes of the idea of human
intelligence?

> This fact it turns out
> was known to many if not all of the high ranking nobility in every Western
> society from the time of the Egyptians, the Greeks and the Romans.

Hmm. What, I wonder, is the coptic for 'ungrown brain'? <g>

...
> at last allow humanity to move forward peacefully on the religious front.

Arguing that everyone else's religion is irrational is unlikely to
result in anything but dissention, surely?

All the best,

Roger Pearse

Relevant Pages