Re: SR's Problems With Two Events
ande452_at_attglobal.net
Date: 10/21/04
- Next message: josefmatz: "Re: General Relativistc Maxwell Equations for the Mass ?"
- Previous message: sal: "Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong?"
- In reply to: Bill Hobba: "Re: SR's Problems With Two Events"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: SR's Problems With Two Events"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: SR's Problems With Two Events"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:34:32 -0700
Bill Hobba wrote:
>
> "Cadwgan Gedrych" <cadwgan_gedrych@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:5e1797c9.0410200423.69e93c77@posting.google.com...
> > Tom Roberts <tjroberts@lucent.com> wrote in message
> news:<cl3caa$bv5@netnews.proxy.lucent.com>...
> > > Cadwgan Gedrych wrote:
> > > > My analysis is based on the following four facts:
> > > > (2) Any two events must occur either truly
> > > > simultaneously or not.
> > >
> > > On what do you base this assumption? -- this is most definitely
> > > not a "fact".
> > >
> > > In fact, the world we inhabit does not conform to your assumption.
> >
> > So far, you have not won a single argument with me, so why
> > do you keep on beating your head against a stone wall?
>
> When you can boast a PhD in physics and posts of the quality of Tom Roberts
> then you may be in a position to have a meaningful discussion.
Citing Tom Roberts' qualifications isn't necessary here (and
will probably attract more crank postings).
The real point is that this poster doesn't understand
the scientific method.
John Anderson
- Next message: josefmatz: "Re: General Relativistc Maxwell Equations for the Mass ?"
- Previous message: sal: "Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong?"
- In reply to: Bill Hobba: "Re: SR's Problems With Two Events"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: SR's Problems With Two Events"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: SR's Problems With Two Events"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
