Re: Basics series proposed

From: Paul Draper (pdraper_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/21/04


Date: 21 Oct 2004 05:47:41 -0700


"Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net> wrote in message news:<SQBdd.89041$ay5.7962@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>...
>
> BTW, the spatial coordinates when the light leaves the origin
> of k are (0,0,0) and when it returns, they are (0,0,0) in his equation
> ½[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v))] =
> tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
> so v = 0, sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 1.
>
> Now you can say
> "Oh... Really?...Oh. I see I was confused. OK, I get it now."
> I have this strange feeling you will not.
>
> If you feel demoralized, I can only advise you this way.
> "If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen" - Harry Truman
>

Androcles, in your case, I will get over my disenchantment.

But I want this to be a fruitful exchange between the two of us, so
let's agree on some ground rules. We'll go things one little step at a
time. When we get to a point of conflict, we'll identify what the
error is on either side, and the party in error MUST acknowledge the
error and remove the erroneous statement from further discussion.

We can proceed any of three ways:
1. We start with the assumptions and implications of your theory.
2. We start with the assumptions and implications of special
relativity.
3. We start with what you think is specifically factually wrong with
SR, internally inconsistent, or inconsistent with other accepted
theoretical models.

Your choice.

PD



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Basics series proposed
    ... the spatial coordinates when the light leaves the origin ... > I have this strange feeling you will not. ... We start with the assumptions and implications of your theory. ... SR, internally inconsistent, or inconsistent with other accepted ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Basics series proposed
    ... the spatial coordinates when the light leaves the origin ... > I have this strange feeling you will not. ... We start with the assumptions and implications of your theory. ... SR, internally inconsistent, or inconsistent with other accepted ...
    (sci.physics.particle)