Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one

From: Ken S. Tucker (dynamics_at_vianet.on.ca)
Date: 10/21/04


Date: 21 Oct 2004 16:14:06 -0700

Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cl8q06$1ad$2@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> Ken Seto wrote:
> > Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cl8329$p4v$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...

> >>Agreed. But that has nothing to do with what you claimed above - that
> >>beta decay *confirmed* *later* the prediction by energy conservation.
> >>Actually, it was the *observation* of the beta decay spectrum,
> >>*combined* with energy conservation, which led to the prediction of the
> >>neutrino.

> When combined with the observations, it did.

> Just as energy conservation predicted the existence of the neutrino when
> it was combined with the observations.

I thought at first Bjoern did a typo, however he
repeated his error, I will correct, the current need
for the neutrino is based on SPIN conservation NOT
energy conservation. That is obvious to anyone who
understands that the energy of a neutrino is ambiguous,
and has never been set forth to solve any sort of
energy conservation problem.

The two solutions are as follows,
(n=neutron, p=proton, e=electron, v=neutrino)

(1) n => p + e + v (spin 1/2 = 1/2 + 1/2 -1/2)

or

(2) n + v' => p + e (spin 1/2 + 1/2 = 1/2 + 1/2)

Decay (1) is acausal, and depends on spontaneous decay.

Decay (2) is causual, and depends on the neutrino flux.

While (1) is conventional, (2) is leading edge.

Regards
Ken S. Tucker

> Bjoern



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one
    ... > Ken Seto wrote: ... for the neutrino is based on SPIN conservation NOT ... energy conservation problem. ... Decay is acausal, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one
    ... > Ken Seto wrote: ... for the neutrino is based on SPIN conservation NOT ... energy conservation problem. ... Decay is acausal, ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one
    ... > for the neutrino is based on SPIN conservation NOT ... > energy conservation. ... Does anyone beside Ken S. Tucker understand what this sentence is ... > Decay is acausal, ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one
    ... > for the neutrino is based on SPIN conservation NOT ... > energy conservation. ... Does anyone beside Ken S. Tucker understand what this sentence is ... > Decay is acausal, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one
    ... > for the neutrino is based on SPIN conservation NOT ... > energy conservation. ... Does anyone beside Ken S. Tucker understand what this sentence is ... > Decay is acausal, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)