Re: A definition of time.
From: Creighton Hogg (wchogg_at_hep.wisc.edu)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: Ken Seto: "A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory)"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ......."
- In reply to: Daniel Weston: "Re: A definition of time."
- Next in thread: Daniel Weston: "Re: A definition of time."
- Reply: Daniel Weston: "Re: A definition of time."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:45:38 -0500
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Daniel Weston wrote:
> Velocity is straight line motion. There is no straight line motion in
> rotation.
Huh? What you wrote sounds quite odd. According to this definition it
sounds as though a stone in a sling wouldn't have velocity, since it isn't
moving in a straight line.
- Next message: Ken Seto: "A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory)"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ......."
- In reply to: Daniel Weston: "Re: A definition of time."
- Next in thread: Daniel Weston: "Re: A definition of time."
- Reply: Daniel Weston: "Re: A definition of time."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|