Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
From: George Hammond (nowhere_at_nomailspam.com)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: AllYou!: "Re: Scientifically valid definitions."
- In reply to: John: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:37:27 -0400
"John" <JohnASiegel@worlodnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:417EDEE4.2060908@worlodnet.att.net...
>
>
> George Hammond wrote:
> > "ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote in
> > message news:10nsucak94m7k02@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > For interested readers, here is the charter for my new
> > moderated newsgroup. As you can see there is little
> > liklihood that you will be psoting there... and good
> > riddance:
> >
> > CHARTER: alt.sci.god-relativity.moderated
> >
> > alt.sci.god-relativity.moderated is a moderated newsgroup for
> > the discussion of the connection between Einstein's theory of
> > Relativity and the traditional mainstream theories of God. Of
> > particular interest is the newly discovered equation "God=G_uv"
> > and related Relativistic phenomena that have been the subject
> > of growing Internet discussion for the past several years.
> > This NG is intended to be a high level scientific forum and does
> > not encourage scientific amateurs or amateurs in general to submit
> > posts to the newsgroup. In particular, while anonymous posting is
> > permitted, first time posters are required to state their
> > scientific qualifications in a brief introduction at the beginning of
> > their first post. "Qualifications" may be degrees, publications,
> > vocational experience, life experience, private study, books read,
> > personal websites, Usenet posting histories or practically anything
> > indicating the posters degree of competence vis a vis the content
> > of his posts. Failure to state ones "qualifications" in the first
> > post will be grounds for automatic rejection of submissions by the
> > poster. Identifying information of any kind is not required but
> > may be volunteered if desired (such as posters true name, university
> > names, employers names, journal names, professional affiliations,
> > dates, locations, etc.) and the stated qualifications will not be
> > checked or verified by the moderator. This is strictly an honor
> > system to aid readers in their assessment of the qualifications of
> > the poster. Posts whose content are in ludicrous disparity with
> > the stated qualifications of the poster will of course be rejected.
> > Generally, discussion is to be carried on at the college
> > graduate level and/or preferably higher, in any field relating
> > to the subject of a Relativistic scientific explanation of God.
> > Posts obviously not manifesting that level of competence may be
> > rejected by the moderator as "inappropriate" to the newsgroup.
> > Lengthy posts consisting of little more than unsupported assertions
> > and/or conjectural personal opinions, are apt to be rejected as
> > inappropriate. In particular, it is noted that unmoderated
> > discussion in this area has produced an extremely high percentage
> > of harassing, incompetent and off topic posts, so much so that
> > qualified professionals have avoided such discussion. The purpose
> > of this newsgroup is to raise the level of discussion to a that
> > of a competent scientific forum, and thereby encourage knowledgeable
> > professionals to contribute to the field.
> > Ad hominem insults, off topic comments, trolls, flames,
> > harassment, spam, binaries, commercial advertising, profanity,
> > etc. will also be automatically rejected.
> > It is expected that this will be a low volume newsgroup simply
> > because the discussion standards have been set to a high level.
> > Rapid fire chit chat will be held to an absolute minimum and only
> > well composed and mainly factual material will be posted. Critical
> > line item commentary containing little or no stand alone position
> > statements will generally be rejected.
> > The group will be manually moderated, and the first moderator is
> > to be George Hammond (M.S. Physics).
> >
> > Further details are as follows:
> >
> > 1. Crossposting up to 4 additional unmoderated newsgroups
> > is permitted. Crossposting to other moderated newsgroups
> > is not permitted.
> > 2. Archiving... to be announced
> > 3. NG email addresses... to be announced
> >
> >
> > END CHARTER.
> >
> > ====================================
> > SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> > 1st mirror site:
> > http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> > 2nd mirror site:
> > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> > new site (under construction):
> > http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
> > ====================================
> >
> >
> Very interesting - the moderator is incapable of meeting his own
> qualifications for posting
>
[Hammond]
One thing is certain... the moderator certainly will be able
to trash posts such as yours.
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: AllYou!: "Re: Scientifically valid definitions."
- In reply to: John: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Next in thread: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Reply: bv_schornak: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|