Re: A definition of time.
From: Paul B. Andersen (paul.b.andersen_at_hia.no)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong?"
- Previous message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: Mathimatical exercise"
- In reply to: Daniel Weston: "Re: A definition of time."
- Next in thread: TomGee: "Re: A definition of time."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:19:50 +0200
"Daniel Weston" <daniel009@webtv.net> skrev i melding news:3617-417EC904-208@storefull-3135.bay.webtv.net...
> Hogg: You are correct that my statement was not precise. "Velocity" is
> unacclerated motion. In deep space that approximates straight line
> motion.
"velocity, which is speed x time"
"Velocity is straight line motion"
"Velocity is unacclerated motion"
Maybe you should look it up? :-)
Paul
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong?"
- Previous message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: Mathimatical exercise"
- In reply to: Daniel Weston: "Re: A definition of time."
- Next in thread: TomGee: "Re: A definition of time."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
