Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one
From: mike3 (mike4ty4_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: shevek: "Re: Scientifically valid definitions."
- Previous message: Daniel Weston: "Re: How to built a universal clock"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Next in thread: Greg Neill: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: Greg Neill: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Oct 2004 13:33:42 -0700
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:<2tpprvF23gjlfU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> Ken Seto wrote:
>
> >
> > You don't have the knowledge to judge my theory.
>
> You don't have the mathematics to write an effective theory. You are a
> lite-weight. Why don't you read the journal or arxiv to see what real
> physics papers look like.
>
> Bob Kolker
Prove that the theory doesn't work, not just your dumb-$hit criticism.
Show the actually fallacy in the theory ITSELF.
- Next message: shevek: "Re: Scientifically valid definitions."
- Previous message: Daniel Weston: "Re: How to built a universal clock"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Next in thread: Greg Neill: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: Greg Neill: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
