sci.physics.relativity
By Thread
6621 messages sorted by: [ date ]
Starting: 09/30/04
Ending: 10/31/04
- zero and infinity Revisited Max Keon (10/31/04)
- Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true? Louis Nielsen (10/30/04)
- Error #1 in USAF Study on UFO Physics Jack Sarfatti (10/30/04)
- Galileo's Relativity & Newton's Relativity. Daniel Weston (10/30/04)
- How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (10/30/04)
- Re: Religious terminology question TMG (10/30/04)
- [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month (was: Re: Hammond Teh Moderator) Peter J Ross (10/30/04)
- Re: Hammond Teh Moderator -> Re: Proposal- alt.sci.relativistic-god.moderated bv_schornak (10/29/04)
- Re: Hammond Teh Moderator -> Re: Proposal- alt.sci.relativistic-god.moderated George Hammond (10/29/04)
- Imagination!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/29/04)
- Pure Science!!!!!!!!!!!!!................ ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/29/04)
- Kerry anti-war was really the communist's peace plan Mitchell (10/29/04)
- Roger Penrose Nonlocality of Gravity Energy & Other Matters Jack Sarfatti (10/29/04)
- Re: Roger Penrose Nonlocality of Gravity Energy & Other Matters vonroach (10/29/04)
- Zero Point Energy & Gravity Jack Sarfatti (10/28/04)
- effect of high speed of electron on current amitmishra.mits_at_gmail.com (10/28/04)
- TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Bill Hobba (10/30/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Mike (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Androcles (10/30/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES greywolf42 (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Tom Roberts (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/29/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES TomGee (10/29/04)
- Higgs field can be SpaceTime? newzguy (10/28/04)
- Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/28/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/29/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/30/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (10/30/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/30/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/30/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/29/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/29/04)
- Measuring rest Mass in GR (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/27/04)
- Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/27/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Old Man (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR ad (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Old Man (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/29/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/29/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (10/28/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Old Man (10/28/04)
- Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Jack Sarfatti (10/27/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (10/27/04)
- Space Culture 101 Gordon Muir (10/27/04)
- Yes, McAnally? eleaticus (10/27/04)
- Lattice shearing Mayank (10/27/04)
- A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Ken Seto (10/26/04)
- Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock Eugene Shubert (10/26/04)
- Mathimatical exercise penguinista (10/26/04)
- Orbits About Black Holes - Free Interactive Animation George Jones (10/26/04)
- "TIME DILATION" ADDENDUM V ertner Vergon (10/26/04)
- A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Harry (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Creighton Hogg (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Paul B. Andersen (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. TomGee (10/30/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. TomGee (10/28/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Harry (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. stephen_at_nomail.com (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Harry (10/26/04)
- TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (10/26/04)
- The NEXT MASTER - THE MOONIE LIFE Gordon Muir (10/26/04)
- Space Culture 101 Gordon Muir (10/26/04)
- The Retreat From Reality jahn (10/26/04)
- Re: Important Interrobang Cartel news TMG (10/26/04)
- Nonlocality of Energy in General Relativity Jack Sarfatti (10/26/04)
- Maxwell's Displacement Current jahn (10/25/04)
- Ref re: spacelike singularity + origin of the universe? Paul E (10/25/04)
- TIME FLOW V ertner Vergon (10/25/04)
- Pioneer Anomaly & Galactic Halo Jack Sarfatti (10/25/04)
- The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity Serutcipq (10/25/04)
- UEB / kst on Planck Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
- Re: Capt kirk to really boldly go nightbat (10/25/04)
- Re: definition of a clock in relativity theory Eric Baird (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminalinformation transfer. nightbat (10/25/04)
- Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? Paul Stowe (10/24/04)
- Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Amantine (10/24/04)
- Re: Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Tom Roberts (10/24/04)
- Re: Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Amantine (10/25/04)
- Re: Electromagnetism in general relativity: two questions Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
- Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Uncle Al (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/26/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (10/27/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (10/28/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/29/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/30/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (10/31/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. RP (10/31/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Luigi Caselli (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Paul Lawler (10/24/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/25/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
- Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/24/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/26/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/26/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/28/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/29/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/30/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Androcles (10/30/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bill Hobba (10/30/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/30/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/26/04)
- Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly Jack Sarfatti (10/24/04)
- NONLOCALITY OF GRAVITY ENERGY & WMD Jack Sarfatti (10/24/04)
- Re: nonstationary states N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/24/04)
- In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/23/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/25/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory YBM (10/25/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/26/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/28/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eugene Shubert (10/29/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory YBM (10/29/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory YBM (10/24/04)
- Re: In Perfect Agreement with Einstein's Special Theory Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
- Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/23/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/25/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. sal (10/26/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Tom Roberts (10/24/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. John Kennaugh (10/25/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. jahn (10/25/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. sal (10/26/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/27/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Eric Gisse (10/27/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Randy Poe (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. John Kennaugh (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (10/24/04)
- Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity? Elpoepq (10/23/04)
- Re: Spoon. TMG (10/23/04)
- Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/23/04)
- Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/23/04)
- The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Karl-Hugo Weesberg (10/23/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Paul Stowe (10/23/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Eugene Shubert (10/23/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Ken Seto (10/24/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Harry (10/25/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/25/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Tom Roberts (10/26/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Paul B. Andersen (10/26/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Randy Poe (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Bill Rowe (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Titan Point (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Titan Point (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Titan Point (10/29/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Eric Gisse (10/30/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... David Evens (10/30/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... The Ghost In The Machine (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... The Ghost In The Machine (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... The Ghost In The Machine (10/28/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... shevek (10/30/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
- Light model tussock (10/23/04)
- NASA Pioneer Anomaly is a Hedgehog Dark Energy Vacuum Point Defect Jack Sarfatti (10/23/04)
- GR and Stronger Gravity At a Distance Mitchell (10/23/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/25/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/26/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/26/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/25/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/25/04)
- Well, Bilge? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Drag Free Control jahn (10/22/04)
- Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Martin Hogbin (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Thomas Jones (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. xxein (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Martin Hogbin (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. robert j. kolker (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Martin Hogbin (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Martin Hogbin (10/25/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. shevek (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/27/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. shevek (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. shevek (10/30/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/30/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/30/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (10/28/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/29/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/23/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Frames and equations eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Frames and equations Martin Hogbin (10/22/04)
- Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/22/04)
- Hunh, Titan? eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Ken S. Tucker (10/23/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/29/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Eric Gisse (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/30/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/31/04)
- Re: Frames and equations Paul Draper (10/22/04)
- Re: Frames and equations Bilge (10/24/04)
- Special for The Ghost in the Machine eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Well, Dirk? eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Why Uncle Al usually just name-calls eleaticus (10/21/04)
- C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/21/04)
- Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption Van Jacques (10/21/04)
- Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption Uncle Al (10/21/04)
- Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/22/04)
- Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/23/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 43 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 43 David Evens (10/25/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 43 eleaticus (10/25/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 43 David Evens (10/26/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/23/04)
- Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/22/04)
- B. Newtonian Micheslon-Morley vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/21/04)
- A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/21/04)
- Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/21/04)
- Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/21/04)
- Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Daryl McCullough (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Androcles (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Uncle AssAl-ery number 4003. eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Daryl McCullough (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Daryl McCullough (10/23/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Paul Draper (10/22/04)
- Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Lordy, Hobba, get it straight. Or are you that incompetent? eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Lordy, Hobba, get it straight. Or are you that incompetent? Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) ZZBunker (10/23/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Mike (10/23/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Androcles (10/23/04)
- The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/24/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/24/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/25/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/25/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/25/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/26/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/26/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/26/04)
- Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/26/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 54322 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Mike (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 410052 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 4005 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Mike (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 Edward Green (10/23/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 Edward Green (10/24/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 eleaticus (10/24/04)
- Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
- A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/21/04)
- Article: Relativity tested on a shoestring budget Robert Karl Stonjek (10/21/04)
- Re: A New Definition for TIME Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? Len Gaasenbeek (10/21/04)
- Re: Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Correction Androcles (10/21/04)
- Correction Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? penguinista (10/21/04)
- Re: Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? shuba (10/21/04)
- Re: Does Newton's law f = (ma) hold true in all cases? Bill Hobba (10/21/04)
- Re: Relativity and Reasonableness Tests Bilge (10/21/04)
- Frame Dragging Gedanken Paradox? Ken S. Tucker (10/21/04)
- Frame dragging confirmed according to researchers... Eric Gisse (10/21/04)
- Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? AllYou! (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? AllYou! (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? David Canzi -- non-mailable address (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? AllYou! (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? EjP (10/21/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? David Evens (10/22/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/22/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? greywolf42 (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? robert j. kolker (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/25/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? greywolf42 (10/25/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? David Evens (10/30/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? robert j. kolker (10/30/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? greywolf42 (10/25/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Jack Jones (10/22/04)
- Re: Mileva Maric - any educated opions? Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- one more time, Androcles eleaticus (10/21/04)
- A history of mechanics Franco (10/21/04)
- sal's persuasive rhetoric. Androcles (10/20/04)
- Yes, McAnally? eleaticus (10/20/04)
- To forever irrationally argue against instrumentalism Patrick Reany (10/20/04)
- Some real equivalence jahn (10/20/04)
- paradox in quantum mechanics jsp (10/20/04)
- Re: Proof of time? Paul Cardinale (10/20/04)
- General Relativistc Maxwell Equations for the Mass ? josefmatz (10/20/04)
- Newby - Don't Shoot The Crow (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Martin Hogbin (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Titan Point (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Titan Point (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/22/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Titan Point (10/23/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Bilge (10/24/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Creighton Hogg (10/24/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Martin Hogbin (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Tom Roberts (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Androcles (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Paul Draper (10/20/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: Newby - Don't Shoot Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)
- 25,000 Euros to explain Relativity in less than 5 minutes Mark Szlazak (10/20/04)
- Picture me how I 'WALK' & I give you $1.000.000 Boyan (10/20/04)
- Re: Picture me how I 'WALK' & I give you $1.000.000 Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: Picture me how I 'WALK' & I give you $1.000.000 Theo Wollenleben (10/20/04)
- Re: Picture me how I 'WALK' & I give you $1.000.000 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/20/04)
- Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Bill Hobba (10/19/04)
- Re: Is a Crystal-clear Theory Preferable to Dogmatic Riddles? Eugene Shubert (10/19/04)
- SR's Problems With Two Events Cadwgan Gedrych (10/19/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Dirk Van de moortel (10/19/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events EjP (10/19/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Tom Roberts (10/19/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Cadwgan Gedrych (10/20/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events EjP (10/20/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Cadwgan Gedrych (10/22/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/21/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Bill Hobba (10/21/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Cadwgan Gedrych (10/22/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Androcles (10/22/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/21/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Cadwgan Gedrych (10/21/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Titan Point (10/22/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Cadwgan Gedrych (10/24/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Dirk Van de moortel (10/24/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Cadwgan Gedrych (10/20/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Paul B. Andersen (10/19/04)
- Re: SR's Problems With Two Events Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: Examining Mathematical Approaches Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/19/04)
- Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Jason W. Hinson (10/19/04)
- Infinity or finity?? Boyan (10/18/04)
- Gravity as Falling Space Henry Haapalainen (10/18/04)
- More Paul B. Andersen corruption eleaticus (10/18/04)
- The Spin Proviso to Relativity Ben Bean (10/18/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Ben Bean (10/18/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Paul B. Andersen (10/20/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity sal (10/20/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Ben Bean (10/21/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Paul B. Andersen (10/21/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Ben Bean (10/21/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Ben Bean (10/21/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Paul B. Andersen (10/22/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Ben Bean (10/23/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Paul B. Andersen (10/24/04)
- Re: The Spin Proviso to Relativity Ben Bean (10/27/04)
- fhe grand unified theory Eugen Negut (10/18/04)
- Extra Dimensional Physics and Rotating SuperConductors K_Loupspeed (10/18/04)
- B SR-cult fraud and corruption (rev a) eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Abandon hope all ye who enter here Russell E. Rierson (10/18/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Teresita (10/17/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind alice (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind alice (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind alice (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Moonshadao (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind ekurtz99_at_WhoKnowsWhere.com (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Rob Duncan (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind alice (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind E Kurtz (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Rob Duncan (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Rob Duncan (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Moonshadao (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Mike Biggins (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind robert j. kolker (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Moonshadao (10/19/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind potts (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind robert j. kolker (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind potts (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Teresita (10/21/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind potts (10/21/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Pepe le Pew (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind potts (10/21/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind musician (10/21/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind potts (10/22/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind walnutsoul (10/20/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind alice (10/19/04)
- The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/17/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/19/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... John Sefton (10/20/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Ken S. Tucker (10/20/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/25/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/27/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Ken S. Tucker (10/27/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Mike (10/20/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (10/21/04)
- Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/19/04)
- Deconstructing Jacky Jack Sarfatti (10/17/04)
- A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Dirk Van de moortel (10/17/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Eric Gisse (10/17/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) RP (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) RP (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bill Hobba (10/17/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Paul B. Andersen (10/18/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/18/04)
- Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
- O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Gerald L. O'Barr (10/17/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Bill Hobba (10/17/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Patrick Reany (10/17/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Bill Hobba (10/17/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Harry (10/18/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Patrick Reany (10/18/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Harry (10/19/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Patrick Reany (10/19/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Patrick Reany (10/17/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Yule Log (10/17/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Patrick Reany (10/17/04)
- Re: O'Barr: Reany's views of physics and reality. Bill Hobba (10/17/04)
- Re: Carlos Castro's Cosmological Model of Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly TMG (10/17/04)
- a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system richardconers_at_yahoo.com (10/17/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/17/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Tom Roberts (10/17/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/17/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/17/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/18/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/18/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bill Hobba (10/19/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/19/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Peter Kinane (10/19/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bill Hobba (10/19/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/20/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/23/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/23/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/20/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bill Hobba (10/21/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system chaverondier (10/21/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/21/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/23/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/23/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/29/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/19/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/19/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/20/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/20/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/18/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/18/04)
- "quantum mechanics and experience"--non separability richardconers_at_yahoo.com (10/17/04)
- Re: "quantum mechanics and experience"--non separability robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
- Re: "quantum mechanics and experience"--non separability Bill Hobba (10/17/04)
- Re: "quantum mechanics and experience"--non separability bernard.chaverondier (10/17/04)
- Re: "quantum mechanics and experience"--non separability Bilge (10/17/04)
- Re: "quantum mechanics and experience"--non separability Ilja Schmelzer (10/18/04)
- Special Relativity Done Right Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
- Fifth Postulate Problem Peter Kinane (10/16/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Androcles (10/16/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Daniel Weston (10/16/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/16/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Dirk Van de moortel (10/17/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Daniel Weston (10/17/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Peter Kinane (10/17/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Peter Kinane (10/17/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Daniel Weston (10/16/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem xxein (10/18/04)
- Re: Fifth Postulate Problem Androcles (10/16/04)
- johnreed take V.I johnlawrencereed (10/16/04)
- A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/16/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Androcles (10/16/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/16/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/17/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Dirk Van de moortel (10/17/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/18/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Eric Gisse (10/19/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/16/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Martin Hogbin (10/17/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/18/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Martin Hogbin (10/18/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/19/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Ken S. Tucker (10/19/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/19/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/19/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Martin Hogbin (10/24/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser sal (10/18/04)
- Re: A small rocket-science brain teaser Androcles (10/16/04)
- Too Trivial for Tom Roberts, Impossible for Most Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
- Re: Too Trivial for Tom Roberts, Impossible for Most Tom Roberts (10/24/04)
- A New Definition for "TIME" Ken Seto (10/16/04)
- The discoveries of the plagiarist Pentcho Valev (10/16/04)
- Re: The discoveries of the plagiarist Dirk Van de moortel (10/16/04)
- Re: The discoveries of the plagiarist bernard.chaverondier (10/16/04)
- Re: The discoveries of the plagiarist robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
- Re: The discoveries of the plagiarist Pentcho Valev (10/17/04)
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (10/16/04)
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (10/16/04)
- Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/16/04)
- Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/16/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Well, Kolker? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Kolker? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Kolker? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (10/26/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Igor (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (10/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Mitchell (10/18/04)
- Well, Mori-Max Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Mori-Max Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Mori-Max Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
- Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals David Evens (10/25/04)
- Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/25/04)
- Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals David Evens (10/26/04)
- Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/26/04)
- Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
- Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/26/04)
- Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/16/04)
- Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/16/04)
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (10/16/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/16/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws The Ghost In The Machine (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/17/04)
- Well, McAnal? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, McAnal? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, McAnal? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Well, Uncle assAl? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Uncle assAl? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/22/04)
- Re: Well, Uncle assAl? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/23/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Gregory L. Hansen (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Gregory L. Hansen (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Gregory L. Hansen (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/20/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/20/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/27/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws The Ghost In The Machine (10/19/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/20/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/20/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/17/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/16/04)
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (10/16/04)
- Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/16/04)
- A new weighty expl proof of the existence of aether joseph levy (10/15/04)
- Re: A new weighty expl proof of the existence of aether Dirk Van de moortel (10/15/04)
- Re: A new weighty expl proof of the existence of aether Bill Hobba (10/15/04)
- Re: A new weighty expl proof of the existence of aether bernard.chaverondier (10/16/04)
- Re: A new weighty expl proof of the existence of aether Bilge (10/17/04)
- Re: A Ballistic photon theory Androcles (10/15/04)
- Re: Answer to unresolved questions (answer to bill Hobba,to post of 23 July 2004) joseph levy (10/15/04)
- A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Patrick Reany (10/15/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Androcles (10/15/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Bill Hobba (10/15/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Patrick Reany (10/16/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Bill Hobba (10/16/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Patrick Reany (10/17/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Bill Hobba (10/17/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Patrick Reany (10/16/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/15/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/16/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Bilge (10/16/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Patrick Reany (10/16/04)
- What does MODELING mean? Daniel Weston (10/16/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Ken S. Tucker (10/16/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Ken S. Tucker (10/17/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/17/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Patrick Reany (10/17/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Patrick Reany (10/20/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/18/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Daniel Weston (10/18/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? Bill Hobba (10/18/04)
- Re: What does MODELING mean? robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Bill Hobba (10/16/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Bilge (10/16/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Patrick Reany (10/17/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Bilge (10/18/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Patrick Reany (10/18/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Bilge (10/24/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Gerald L. O'Barr (10/18/04)
- Re: A basic principle of physics modeling vs 'reality' Patrick Reany (10/16/04)
- How important is SR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury Nicolaas Vroom (10/15/04)
- Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/15/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/15/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. sal (10/15/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/15/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/18/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/21/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. greywolf42 (10/22/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Ken Seto (10/18/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/19/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. shevek (10/19/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. shevek (10/22/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/25/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/26/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/26/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. shevek (10/25/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
- Re: Attack instead of explain or ignore. AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Ken, need help with this Pax (10/15/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (10/15/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/16/04)
- Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/20/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (10/21/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/22/04)
- OOPS! Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/22/04)
- Re: OOPS! Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (10/22/04)
- Re: OOPS! Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/23/04)
- Re: OOPS! Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (10/23/04)
- Re: OOPS! Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/28/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (10/22/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/23/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (10/24/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/28/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (10/29/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/29/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (10/30/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Paul Draper (10/15/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Tom Roberts (10/15/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/21/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Paul Draper (10/21/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/21/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Paul Draper (10/22/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/23/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Paul Draper (10/26/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Eric Gisse (10/27/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Paul Draper (10/27/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/28/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Paul Draper (10/28/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/28/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/29/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/29/04)
- Corrected repost (original nuked from Usenet) Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/29/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/21/04)
- REVISED: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/15/04)
- Part 1 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (10/20/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Gauge (10/26/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (10/15/04)
- Ideas please? LeeRyder (10/15/04)
- Re: Ideas please? Androcles (10/15/04)
- Re: Ideas please? LeeRyder (10/15/04)
- Re: Ideas please? LeeRyder (10/17/04)
- Re: Ideas please? Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Ideas please? shuba (10/17/04)
- Re: Ideas please? LeeRyder (10/17/04)
- Re: Ideas please? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/17/04)
- Re: Ideas please? LeeRyder (10/18/04)
- Re: Ideas please? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/18/04)
- Re: Ideas please? Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Ideas please? stephen_at_nomail.com (10/20/04)
- Re: Ideas please? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/21/04)
- Re: Ideas please? Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Ideas please? LeeRyder (10/18/04)
- Re: Ideas please? LeeRyder (10/17/04)
- Hartle Gravitation Text Errata? David Park (10/14/04)
- Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Androcles (10/14/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/14/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Titan Point (10/15/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Tom Roberts (10/15/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/17/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/17/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/17/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Eric Gisse (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Androcles (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Androcles (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Androcles (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/20/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Paul B. Andersen (10/21/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Paul B. Andersen (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. sal (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Androcles (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Paul B. Andersen (10/21/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Paul B. Andersen (10/18/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. Dirk Van de moortel (10/19/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. mike3 (10/17/04)
- The biggest mistake in classical optics and its solution josefmatz (10/14/04)
- Re: The biggest mistake in classical optics and its solution xxein (10/15/04)
- Re: The biggest mistake in classical optics and its solution Bilge (10/15/04)
- Re: The biggest mistake in classical optics and its solution Tom Roberts (10/15/04)
- Re: The biggest mistake in classical optics and its solution Dirk Van de moortel (10/16/04)
- Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? josefmatz (10/14/04)
- Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/14/04)
- Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Uncle Al (10/14/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Uncle Al (10/14/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Richard Schultz (10/17/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/14/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Gregory L. Hansen (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Gregory L. Hansen (10/16/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Gregory L. Hansen (10/16/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Creighton Hogg (10/16/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/16/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/16/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/17/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/18/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/18/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) ZZBunker (10/14/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) ZZBunker (10/14/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/16/04)
- Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Uncle Al (10/14/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Uncle Al (10/14/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/14/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/14/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bilge (10/14/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/15/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed xxein (10/15/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Old Man (10/15/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Ilja Schmelzer (10/15/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/20/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Creighton Hogg (10/20/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/20/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/21/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Gregory L. Hansen (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/22/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul B. Andersen (10/22/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/22/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/22/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/22/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/22/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/23/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Gregory L. Hansen (10/24/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Gregory L. Hansen (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Timo Nieminen (10/26/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/24/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/25/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/26/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/28/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/28/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/29/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/30/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/30/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (10/30/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/31/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/28/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/26/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed xxein (10/22/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/23/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed FrediFizzx (10/21/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Myxococcus xanthus (10/21/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Patrick Reany (10/22/04)
- Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
- How to build the Universe unifieur (10/14/04)
- Magnetic field of a stationary particle Daveman750 (10/14/04)
- What happened to Paul Miller? greywolf42 (10/14/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Androcles (10/14/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Dirk Van de moortel (10/14/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Paul Miller (10/22/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? greywolf42 (10/22/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Paul Miller (10/23/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Dirk Van de moortel (10/23/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? greywolf42 (10/24/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? sal (10/26/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? greywolf42 (10/27/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? xxein (10/25/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? sal (10/26/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Paul Miller (10/27/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? greywolf42 (10/27/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? greywolf42 (10/27/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Paul Miller (10/28/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? greywolf42 (10/29/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? Cadwgan Gedrych (10/25/04)
- Re: What happened to Paul Miller? greywolf42 (10/22/04)
- Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" Peter Kinane (10/13/04)
- Re: Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" Bill Hobba (10/13/04)
- Re: Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" Eugene Shubert (10/13/04)
- Re: Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" Peter Kinane (10/14/04)
- Re: Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
- Re: Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" Peter Kinane (10/14/04)
- Re: Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" robert j. kolker (10/14/04)
- Re: Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" Peter Kinane (10/15/04)
- Re: Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" Peter Kinane (10/14/04)
- Re: Introducing "derivations", "givens" and "systems" eleaticus (10/13/04)
- A puzzle AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/13/04)
- Re: A puzzle N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/14/04)
- Re: A puzzle Kees Roos (10/14/04)
- Re: A puzzle Dirk Van de moortel (10/14/04)
- Re: A puzzle Harry (10/14/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/14/04)
- Re: A puzzle Harry (10/14/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/14/04)
- Re: A puzzle Harry (10/15/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/15/04)
- Re: A puzzle Harry (10/15/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/15/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/15/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/16/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle Dirk Van de moortel (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/21/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bill Hobba (10/21/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: A puzzle Androcles (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle Androcles (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bill Hobba (10/16/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle sal (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bill Hobba (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: A puzzle AllYou! (10/14/04)
- Re: A puzzle Bilge (10/15/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (10/13/04)
- hululu Harry (10/13/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/13/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/13/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/15/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/18/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Henri Wilson (10/19/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/19/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/19/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/20/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/19/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/19/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/19/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/20/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/21/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/22/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/23/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts YBM (10/24/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/24/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/25/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Henri Wilson (10/24/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/13/04)
- Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Keplerian motion/solar system's galactic orbital motion Oriel36 (10/13/04)
- Re:Length contraction is not an intrinsic property of an object joseph levy (10/12/04)
- Re: Length is not an intrinsic property of an object joseph levy (10/12/04)
- Length is not an instrinsic property of an object. Paul Draper (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Callipygian Nullifidian (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Callipygian Nullifidian (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Callipygian Nullifidian (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? robert j. kolker (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? ZZBunker (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Ghod (10/15/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Ghod (10/18/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? robert j. kolker (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Androcles (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Superconductors-Hyper Dimensional Physics in Laboratory-at CERN/ESA K_Loupspeed (10/12/04)
- Gravitomagnetism Ziggi (10/12/04)
- Polarisation of a gravitational wave Ziggi (10/12/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave John Sefton (10/13/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave zigoteau (10/14/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave Bilge (10/14/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave Igor (10/15/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave zigoteau (10/15/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave Tom Roberts (10/15/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave zigoteau (10/16/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave zigoteau (10/21/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/15/04)
- Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process Harry (10/12/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process greywolf42 (10/12/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process Nicolaas Vroom (10/12/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process Nicolaas Vroom (10/14/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/15/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process Harry (10/15/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process Nicolaas Vroom (10/15/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process Harry (10/14/04)
- Re: Is Lorentz contraction a real process Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Big Bertha Thing blogs Tony Lance (10/12/04)
- Just a small (maybe stupid) question Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Aage Andersen (10/12/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Androcles (10/12/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Eric Baird (10/12/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Bill Hobba (10/13/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Tom Roberts (10/13/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Androcles (10/13/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question John Kennaugh (10/25/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Androcles (10/25/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Paul B. Andersen (10/27/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Oriel36 (10/30/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question John Kennaugh (10/28/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Paul B. Andersen (10/27/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question John Kennaugh (10/28/04)
- Re: Just a small (maybe stupid) question Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- An interesting integral in diffraction theory josefmatz (10/12/04)
- Quantum cosmology Keshav Kallianpur (10/12/04)
- question on relativistic mass Raheman (10/12/04)
- Re: question on relativistic mass Creighton Hogg (10/12/04)
- Re: question on relativistic mass N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/12/04)
- Re: question on relativistic mass Gauge (10/12/04)
- Re: question on relativistic mass Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/12/04)
- Re: question on relativistic mass ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/13/04)
- Re: question on relativistic mass Oscar Womack (10/13/04)
- Re: question on relativistic mass The Ghost In The Machine (10/14/04)
- Time Dilation (again sorry) Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) TomGee (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Androcles (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Martin Hogbin (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Kenneth Ellested (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Kenneth Ellested (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) AllYou! (10/14/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Martin Hogbin (10/12/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Bill Hobba (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) sal (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) sal (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Androcles (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) sal (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Androcles (10/14/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) sal (10/14/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Androcles (10/14/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Bill Hobba (10/13/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) AllYou! (10/14/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) AllYou! (10/15/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Bill Hobba (10/15/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) AllYou! (10/18/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Bill Hobba (10/18/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) AllYou! (10/19/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) AllYou! (10/20/04)
- Re: Time Dilation (again sorry) N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/12/04)
- Simple Interval Question Edward Green (10/12/04)
- Is the four colour theory also valid on a closed surface ? josefmatz (10/11/04)
- Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/15/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/15/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/16/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/16/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? EjP (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Creighton Hogg (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? EjP (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/15/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/16/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (10/18/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/18/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (10/20/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/24/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/25/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/25/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/25/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/25/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/25/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/25/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/25/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/25/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/30/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/31/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/26/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/18/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (10/19/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/19/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/19/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/22/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/22/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/24/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/24/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/26/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/26/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/26/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/28/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/29/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (10/20/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (10/20/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/22/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/23/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/22/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/22/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Creighton Hogg (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/15/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/15/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/16/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/17/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/17/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/19/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/19/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/18/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Yule Log (10/17/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/19/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/19/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/22/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (10/15/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/26/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (10/26/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/30/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/30/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (10/31/04)
- Superconductors and Experimental Higher Dimensional Spacetime Physics K_Loupspeed (10/11/04)
- Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Eugene Shubert (10/11/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Bilge (10/11/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Eugene Shubert (10/11/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Bilge (10/13/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Eugene Shubert (10/13/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Bilge (10/14/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Bernard Maris (10/15/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Eugene Shubert (10/11/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? ZZBunker (10/11/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? ZZBunker (10/12/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Daniel Weston (10/12/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/13/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Androcles (10/13/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Bilge (10/13/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Eugene Shubert (10/12/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Do Arbitrary Clock Syc Procedures Violate the Laws of Physics? Bilge (10/11/04)
- Is Time real? AllYou! (10/11/04)
- Mickelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/11/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Bilge (10/11/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/11/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller xxein (10/12/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Paul Stowe (10/12/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/19/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/20/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Harry (10/15/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/18/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Harry (10/19/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/19/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/12/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Paul Stowe (10/12/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/13/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Paul Stowe (10/15/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/15/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Bill Hobba (10/16/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/18/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Bilge (10/14/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/15/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Bilge (10/15/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/15/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller David Evens (10/16/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/18/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Harry (10/15/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Androcles (10/15/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Harry (10/17/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Androcles (10/17/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller xxein (10/18/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/18/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/11/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/11/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/11/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller xxein (10/12/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/12/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Oriel36 (10/13/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Oriel36 (10/14/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller xxein (10/17/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Oriel36 (10/18/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller xxein (10/22/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Oriel36 (10/22/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller xxein (10/23/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Oriel36 (10/23/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller xxein (10/27/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Bill Rowe (10/16/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/19/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/20/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/22/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller stephen_at_nomail.com (10/22/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller xxein (10/23/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/19/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Androcles (10/20/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/21/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/21/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/20/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/12/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/12/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/13/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Kenneth Ellested (10/13/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/14/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/15/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Paul Stowe (10/15/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/15/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Paul Stowe (10/16/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller shevek (10/20/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/22/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Paul Stowe (10/23/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller shevek (10/25/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Paul Stowe (10/25/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller shevek (10/27/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Paul Stowe (10/28/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller shevek (10/28/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Paul Stowe (10/30/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller shevek (10/25/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Tom Roberts (10/26/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller shevek (10/27/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller shevek (10/30/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Bilge (10/14/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller greywolf42 (10/11/04)
- Re: Mickelson-Morley & Miller Bilge (10/11/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Henri Wilson (10/11/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Henri Wilson (10/11/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Titan Point (10/13/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Ken Seto (10/13/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Titan Point (10/14/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Henri Wilson (10/15/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Titan Point (10/15/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Henri Wilson (10/16/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Titan Point (10/19/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Henri Wilson (10/20/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Titan Point (10/20/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Henri Wilson (10/20/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Titan Point (10/21/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Henri Wilson (10/21/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Ken Seto (10/15/04)
- Re: Experiment to Test Mutual Time Dilation Ken Seto (10/13/04)
- God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Russell E. Rierson (10/11/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation John Vreeland (10/11/04)
- God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation George Hammond (10/12/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/12/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/12/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Eugene Shubert (10/12/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/13/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation stew dean (10/14/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/15/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation stew dean (10/15/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/15/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation stew dean (10/16/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/16/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation stew dean (10/17/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation bv_schornak (10/16/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation bv_schornak (10/16/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Walter Bushell (10/17/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Eugene Shubert (10/17/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/18/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation stew dean (10/18/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/18/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation bv_schornak (10/18/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/22/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation bv_schornak (10/22/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation stew dean (10/19/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/13/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Eugene Shubert (10/12/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation bv_schornak (10/12/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Eugene Shubert (10/13/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation bv_schornak (10/13/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Goran Dhemmeog (10/13/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/14/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Goran Dhemmeog (10/14/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Goran Dhemmeog (10/14/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation VoiceOfReason (10/16/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/13/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation bv_schornak (10/13/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation George Hammond (10/13/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation bv_schornak (10/12/04)
- Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation Mitch Alsup (10/13/04)
- A equals Hotel Discounts (10/11/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Henri Wilson (10/10/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Henri Wilson (10/10/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Paul B. Andersen (10/11/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Henri Wilson (10/11/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Paul B. Andersen (10/12/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Henri Wilson (10/12/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Paul B. Andersen (10/13/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Henri Wilson (10/13/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Paul B. Andersen (10/14/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Henri Wilson (10/15/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Paul B. Andersen (10/15/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Henri Wilson (10/15/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Paul B. Andersen (10/17/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Henri Wilson (10/17/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Paul B. Andersen (10/20/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Paul B. Andersen (10/11/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Androcles (10/10/04)
- Re: question about the red shift and the hubble constant Henri Wilson (10/10/04)
- Hidden variables in Lorentz transformations joseph levy (10/10/04)
- Tick Fairies Are a Direct Result of Ballistic Theory Myxococcus xanthus (10/10/04)
- Moving media jahn (10/10/04)
- Pioneer Space Probe Anomalous Motion Explained Jack Sarfatti (10/10/04)
- Does gravity waves have a frequency ? unifieur (10/09/04)
- Re: Does gravity waves have a frequency ? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/09/04)
- Re: Does gravity waves have a frequency ? Igor (10/10/04)
- Re: Does gravity waves have a frequency ? carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (10/10/04)
- Re: Does gravity waves have a frequency ? ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/11/04)
- Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 The Ghost In The Machine (10/09/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 Androcles (10/09/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 Eugene Shubert (10/09/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 The Ghost In The Machine (10/10/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 Paul B. Andersen (10/10/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 The Ghost In The Machine (10/10/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 Eugene Shubert (10/10/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 jem (10/11/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 Eugene Shubert (10/12/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 jem (10/12/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 Eugene Shubert (10/12/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 jem (10/13/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 Eugene Shubert (10/13/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 bernard.chaverondier (10/10/04)
- Re: Derivation of Lorentz, take 4 sal (10/11/04)
- Re: Cosmic expansion means > c ? penguinista (10/09/04)
- Helical wave photons. Len Gaasenbeek (10/09/04)
- Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? Dummy (10/09/04)
- Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? Tom Roberts (10/09/04)
- Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? Paul B. Andersen (10/10/04)
- Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/11/04)
- Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? Jimmy Carter (10/13/04)
- What the pace of a clock refers to. Oriel36 (10/09/04)
- The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. by Henri Wilson (10/08/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Dirk Van de moortel (10/08/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Martin Hogbin (10/09/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Paul B. Andersen (10/09/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/09/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Martin Hogbin (10/10/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/10/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Paul B. Andersen (10/10/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/10/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Paul B. Andersen (10/11/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/11/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/11/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/09/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/09/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/09/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/09/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/10/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/10/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/10/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/10/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/11/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/11/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/11/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/11/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/11/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/13/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/13/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/10/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/11/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/12/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Titan Point (10/12/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/12/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/13/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/13/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Titan Point (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/19/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/20/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/19/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. The Ghost In The Machine (10/19/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/23/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/12/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/12/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/12/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/12/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/13/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/13/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/14/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/15/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/17/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Bill Hobba (10/17/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/17/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/18/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/19/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/17/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/18/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/19/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/19/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/20/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/20/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/21/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/21/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/21/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/22/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/22/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/24/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/25/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. David Evens (10/30/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Eric Gisse (10/22/04)
- Re: The "GOODBYE ALBERT" Experiment. Henri Wilson (10/09/04)
- question about LET and quantum mechanics ru (10/08/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics ru (10/11/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Bilge (10/11/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Oriel36 (10/11/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics greywolf42 (10/11/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics ru (10/12/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Ilja Schmelzer (10/12/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics greywolf42 (10/12/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics ru (10/15/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics greywolf42 (10/18/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics FrediFizzx (10/20/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics greywolf42 (10/20/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics FrediFizzx (10/21/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Paul Stowe (10/11/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics ru (10/12/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Paul Stowe (10/12/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Bilge (10/15/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics ru (10/15/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Paul Stowe (10/16/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Bilge (10/16/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics shuba (10/17/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Paul Stowe (10/17/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics shuba (10/17/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Bilge (10/17/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Ilja Schmelzer (10/18/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics FrediFizzx (10/18/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Bill Hobba (10/18/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics shuba (10/18/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Ilja Schmelzer (10/19/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Paul Stowe (10/19/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics FrediFizzx (10/19/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Igor (10/12/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Ilja Schmelzer (10/12/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics Gerald L. O'Barr (10/11/04)
- Re: question about LET and quantum mechanics ru (10/11/04)
- Why geniuses introduce new results Pentcho Valev (10/08/04)
- Speed of light and relativity Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn (10/08/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Paul B. Andersen (10/08/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Bilge (10/09/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/10/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Martin Hogbin (10/10/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity The Ghost In The Machine (10/11/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/11/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Martin Hogbin (10/12/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Paul Bramscher (10/13/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/15/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Paul Bramscher (10/16/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Bilge (10/16/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/16/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Paul Bramscher (10/18/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity stephen_at_nomail.com (10/19/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Paul Bramscher (10/19/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Bilge (10/19/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/18/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Martin Hogbin (10/15/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/18/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Martin Hogbin (10/18/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/19/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Martin Hogbin (10/19/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/20/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Craig Markwardt (10/11/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/12/04)
- Speed of light and relativity Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn (10/11/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Robert B. Winn (10/11/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Bilge (10/11/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/15/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity Bill Hobba (10/15/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/18/04)
- Re: Speed of light and relativity greywolf42 (10/10/04)
- eleaticus Dummy (10/08/04)
- What is the official SR explanation of the MMX null result? Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn (10/08/04)
- Trying figure it out - time dilation Kenneth Ellested (10/07/04)
- Re: Trying figure it out - time dilation Bill Hobba (10/07/04)
- Re: Trying figure it out - time dilation Eli Botkin (10/07/04)
- Re: Trying figure it out - time dilation ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/08/04)
- Re: Trying figure it out - time dilation Jim Black (10/08/04)
- Re: Trying figure it out - time dilation TomGee (10/08/04)
- Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/07/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? J.J. Simplicio (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dave (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? J.J. Simplicio (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dave (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dave (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dave (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dummy (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dummy (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dummy (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dummy (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dummy (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/26/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Marcus Wellpoth (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dave (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? J.J. Simplicio (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? J.J. Simplicio (10/10/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/10/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? J.J. Simplicio (10/10/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/11/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/11/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/11/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/22/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/22/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/22/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? AllYou! (10/22/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/22/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dave (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dave (10/08/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dummy (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/10/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/10/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/11/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/11/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/11/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/11/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/11/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/11/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/12/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/12/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/12/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/12/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Paul B. Andersen (10/12/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? AllYou! (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/14/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/14/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/14/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/14/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/14/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Paul B. Andersen (10/14/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Ken S. Tucker (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Paul B. Andersen (10/13/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/10/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dummy (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/09/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/19/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/19/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/19/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/22/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/22/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/23/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/23/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/24/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/24/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/25/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/25/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/25/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Henri Wilson (10/25/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/26/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/26/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/26/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/26/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Ken S. Tucker (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/22/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/26/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/26/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Creighton Hogg (10/26/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? David (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bruce Pew (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/30/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/31/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? J.J. Simplicio (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/30/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? J.J. Simplicio (10/30/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/31/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/31/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Tom Roberts (10/30/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? J.J. Simplicio (10/30/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/30/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Gauge (10/19/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? David (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Ken S. Tucker (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Tom Roberts (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? David (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Tom Roberts (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? David (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Dirk Van de moortel (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? AllYou! (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Androcles (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Tom Roberts (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/27/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Tom Roberts (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/28/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Tom Roberts (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Ken S. Tucker (10/30/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Tom Roberts (10/30/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Ken S. Tucker (10/29/04)
- Re: Is charge conserved between frames? J.J. Simplicio (10/08/04)
- Ricci and Weyl tensors in GR Kasper J. Larsen (10/07/04)
- Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Paul Draper (10/07/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/07/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Paul Draper (10/08/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Dummy (10/08/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/08/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Patrick Reany (10/09/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bilge (10/09/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Paul Draper (10/08/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Androcles (10/08/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies OC (10/08/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bilge (10/09/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/09/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies OC (10/13/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bilge (10/14/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies OC (10/14/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bilge (10/15/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bilge (10/21/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/09/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/09/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies OC (10/13/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies OC (10/08/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies shevek (10/08/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bilge (10/09/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/09/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies shevek (10/10/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/10/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/10/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies shevek (10/11/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bilge (10/13/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies shevek (10/13/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bilge (10/11/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies shevek (10/12/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bilge (10/13/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies shevek (10/13/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/09/04)
- Re: Self-reference, physics content in definitions, and claimed tautologies Bill Hobba (10/07/04)
- Re: Lolita in China Daniel Weston (10/07/04)
- The father and son paradox. Len Gaasenbeek (10/07/04)
- Re: The father and son paradox. Daniel Weston (10/07/04)
- Re: The father and son paradox. EjP (10/07/04)
- Re: The father and son paradox. AllYou! (10/07/04)
- Re: The father and son paradox. robert j. kolker (10/07/04)
- Re: The father and son paradox. stephen_at_nomail.com (10/07/04)
- Re: The father and son paradox. Len Gaasenbeek (10/08/04)
- Geniuses and suppressed premises Pentcho Valev (10/07/04)
- Hi there George Hammond (10/07/04)
- New reply to Dr Joe Levy and J.P Vigier discredited joseph levy (10/07/04)
- (In)consistency of relativity Pentcho Valev (10/07/04)
- A challenge to SRians! Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn (10/07/04)
- problem with transformation of electric fields Ulrich Leininger (10/07/04)
- Speed of light and relativity Kenneth Ellested (10/07/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited joseph levy (10/06/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited Bill Hobba (10/07/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited TomGee (10/07/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited Tom Roberts (10/11/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited TomGee (10/12/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/12/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited Tom Roberts (10/13/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited TomGee (10/14/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited TomGee (10/07/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Pr Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited Bill Hobba (10/07/04)
- Re: Clock tutorial for Henri Henri Wilson (10/06/04)
- Re: Dr Joe Levy and Jean Pierre Vigier soundly discredited joseph levy (10/06/04)
- Einstein wasn't all wrong Mark Oliver (10/06/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/06/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Bramscher (10/06/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Bill Hobba (10/06/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong AllYou! (10/07/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Bramscher (10/08/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong AllYou! (10/08/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Bill Hobba (10/08/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong AllYou! (10/11/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Bramscher (10/11/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong shuba (10/11/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Bramscher (10/11/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Bramscher (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Bill Hobba (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Bramscher (10/13/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Bramscher (10/16/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Draper (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Bramscher (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong shuba (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Oriel36 (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Bilge (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong shuba (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Bill Hobba (10/12/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong Paul Cardinale (10/07/04)
- Re: Einstein wasn't all wrong ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/08/04)
- Einstein wasn't all wrong Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn (10/08/04)
- Dr Joe Levy and Pr.J.P.Vigier soundly discredited Ben Bean (10/06/04)
- Confused about General Relativity, Help needed Joe (10/06/04)
- Re: Confused about General Relativity, Help needed Ken S. Tucker (10/06/04)
- Re: Confused about General Relativity, Help needed N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/07/04)
- Re: Confused about General Relativity, Help needed Harry (10/12/04)
- Wakey,wakey !!!. Oriel36 (10/06/04)
- SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn (10/06/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Dirk Van de moortel (10/06/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental AllYou! (10/06/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Bill Hobba (10/06/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental AllYou! (10/07/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Bill Hobba (10/07/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental AllYou! (10/08/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental AllYou! (10/12/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Bill Hobba (10/14/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental AllYou! (10/14/04)
- SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn (10/08/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Dummy (10/08/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Paul B. Andersen (10/08/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Dirk Van de moortel (10/08/04)
- SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Minh511_at_ninhthuanpt.com.vn (10/10/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Paul B. Andersen (10/10/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Paul Draper (10/08/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental AllYou! (10/06/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental EjP (10/06/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Bilge (10/07/04)
- Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Dirk Van de moortel (10/06/04)
- Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics Greysky (10/06/04)
- Re: Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics Uncle Al (10/06/04)
- Re: Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics robert j. kolker (10/06/04)
- Re: Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics Old Man (10/06/04)
- Re: Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics robert j. kolker (10/06/04)
- Re: Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics Old Man (10/06/04)
- Re: Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics Bilge (10/07/04)
- Re: Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics robert j. kolker (10/06/04)
- Re: Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics ZZBunker (10/06/04)
- Re: Special cases where superluminal propagation doesn't violate relativity physics Uncle Al (10/06/04)
- Re: Why Time Moves Light Country Loon (10/06/04)
- Re: Did Einstein Repeal Newton's Second Law? Eric Baird (10/06/04)
- Androcles eleaticus (10/05/04)
- Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) Joe (10/05/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) Tom Roberts (10/07/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) Joe (10/08/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) Tom Roberts (10/09/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) Joe (10/10/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/11/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) Tom Roberts (10/11/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) greywolf42 (10/11/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) Tom Roberts (10/13/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) Joe (10/08/04)
- Re: Conservation of momentum (and a weird space drive) Tom Roberts (10/07/04)
- Orthogonality in GR (kst+) Ken S. Tucker (10/05/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/05/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/08/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/09/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Paul Bramscher (10/13/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/14/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Paul Bramscher (10/14/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Bilge (10/14/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/14/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/14/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/14/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/14/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/18/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/19/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/20/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/20/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Mel Lep (10/20/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/21/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/15/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/18/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/18/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/20/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/21/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/22/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/23/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Mel Lep (10/23/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/26/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/26/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 xxein (10/27/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/27/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/27/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/28/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/29/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/30/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/30/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (10/09/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (10/08/04)
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Well, it finally happened....] Richard Herring (10/05/04)
- Robert's logic. Androcles (10/05/04)
- Proceedings of the International Workshop on Astronomy and Relativistic Astrophysics YH Khoo (10/05/04)
- experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Evgenij Barsukov (10/04/04)
- Re: experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (10/04/04)
- Re: experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Evgenij Barsukov (10/05/04)
- Re: experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (10/05/04)
- Re: experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Evgenij Barsukov (10/05/04)
- Re: experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (10/05/04)
- Re: experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Evgenij Barsukov (10/07/04)
- Re: experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (10/07/04)
- Re: experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Evgenij Barsukov (10/05/04)
- Re: experimental implications - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (10/04/04)
- Clock synch. with entangled photons?? shevek (10/04/04)
- Time Out, Anyone? Peter Kinane (10/04/04)
- Re: What is luminiferous ether made of? Bilge (10/04/04)
- What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Xavier (10/04/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? jahn (10/04/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Androcles (10/04/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Jon Bell (10/04/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Hobba (10/04/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Paul Cardinale (10/04/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Bowden (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? robert j. kolker (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Bowden (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Hobba (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Bowden (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Hobba (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Bowden (10/06/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Hobba (10/06/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Paul Draper (10/06/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Hobba (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Jon Bell (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Androcles (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Bowden (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Hobba (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Paul Draper (10/06/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Bill Bowden (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? robert j. kolker (10/04/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? Mark Oliver (10/05/04)
- Re: What would happen when someone travelled as fast as the light? AllYou! (10/06/04)
- Gravity, Curvature vs Force Learner (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Theo Wollenleben (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Alf (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Bill Hobba (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force glbrad01 (10/07/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Bill Hobba (10/07/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Tom Roberts (10/08/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/08/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Ken S. Tucker (10/08/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Bill Hobba (10/10/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/08/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force glbrad01 (10/08/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/08/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force glbrad01 (10/09/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/09/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force glbrad01 (10/10/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Bill Hobba (10/10/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force AllYou! (10/11/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Bill Hobba (10/10/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Tom Roberts (10/05/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Bill Hobba (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Sam Wormley (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force George Jones (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force sal (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Uncle Al (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force ZZBunker (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Igor (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Joe (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force John Denker (10/04/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Mitchell (10/05/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Tom Roberts (10/05/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Mike (10/08/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Bilge (10/09/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Mike (10/10/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Tom Roberts (10/10/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force greywolf42 (10/10/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Tom Roberts (10/13/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force greywolf42 (10/13/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Mike (10/11/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Ilja Schmelzer (10/11/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Mike (10/11/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Mike (10/12/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Jim Black (10/13/04)
- Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force Mike (10/08/04)
- Re: The Instantaneous Creation of Spacetime Geometry Bilge (10/04/04)
- Why is the speed of light what it is? Bill Bowden (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Bilge (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? The Ghost In The Machine (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? David Evens (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Paul Draper (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Androcles (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Dirk Van de moortel (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? AllYou! (10/05/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Dirk Van de moortel (10/05/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? AllYou! (10/05/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Dirk Van de moortel (10/05/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? AllYou! (10/05/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Dirk Van de moortel (10/05/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? AllYou! (10/05/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? sal (10/05/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Dirk Van de moortel (10/05/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Androcles (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Androcles (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? Ken Seto (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? FrediFizzx (10/04/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light what it is? unifieur (10/06/04)
- Re: Spacetime ontology versus ontology of absolute space and time Bilge (10/03/04)
- Two questions Holman (10/03/04)
- Re: How do black holes change in scalar-tensor gravity? Bilge (10/03/04)
- A question about observed event duration & distance? Paul Stowe (10/03/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/03/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? Old Man (10/04/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? Androcles (10/04/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? Old Man (10/05/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? Androcles (10/05/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? AllYou! (10/05/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? Sam Wormley (10/05/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? ZZBunker (10/04/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? Paul Stowe (10/09/04)
- Re: A question about observed event duration & distance? Androcles (10/04/04)
- Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? Qretnirpq (10/03/04)
- Is Faster Than Light Travel or Communication Possible? - From John Baez's Site Pax (10/03/04)
- People Pleasers Operation Mitchell (10/03/04)
- Re: A challenge to non-SRians sal (10/03/04)
- Relativity theory causes brain-cancer! Brian Raab (10/03/04)
- Lanau Pole Bill Hobba (10/03/04)
- coil Springs formula problem MSM (10/02/04)
- Seeing, Assuming, Modeling, Calculating, Predicting, Confirming/Rejecting Paul Draper (10/02/04)
- The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud Holman (10/02/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud Bill Hobba (10/02/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud eleaticus (10/03/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud Dirk Van de moortel (10/03/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud Bill Hobba (10/03/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud eleaticus (10/03/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud Bill Hobba (10/04/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud eleaticus (10/04/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud Bill Hobba (10/04/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud eleaticus (10/04/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud Bill Hobba (10/05/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud eleaticus (10/05/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud Bill Hobba (10/05/04)
- Re: The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud eleaticus (10/05/04)
- Re: Try Jon Bell (10/02/04)
- The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets Lecnacyq (10/02/04)
- Space reality and time jahn (10/02/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Paul B. Andersen (10/02/04)
- Re: Space reality and time jahn (10/02/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Paul B. Andersen (10/03/04)
- Re: Space reality and time jahn (10/04/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Paul B. Andersen (10/04/04)
- Re: Space reality and time jahn (10/04/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Dirk Van de moortel (10/04/04)
- Re: Space reality and time jahn (10/04/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Dirk Van de moortel (10/04/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Paul B. Andersen (10/05/04)
- Re: Space reality and time jahn (10/05/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Paul B. Andersen (10/05/04)
- Re: Space reality and time jahn (10/05/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Ken Seto (10/04/04)
- Re: Space reality and time jahn (10/02/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Tom Roberts (10/02/04)
- Re: Space reality and time Paul B. Andersen (10/02/04)
- Re: Re : What before big bang? YBM (10/02/04)
- Simple groups question, please eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Summatory of the cinetic energy of universe? news.idecnet.com (10/02/04)
- TWO: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Bill Hobba (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba xxein (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba xxein (10/03/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Pax (10/04/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba xxein (10/06/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Pax (10/14/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba xxein (10/20/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Pax (10/23/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Paul Stowe (10/23/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba xxein (10/24/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Paul Stowe (10/25/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba xxein (10/26/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/03/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Bill Hobba (10/02/04)
- Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Bill Hobba (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Bill Hobba (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Bill Hobba (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Bill Hobba (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Pax (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Tom Roberts (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Bill Hobba (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/03/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Dirk Van de moortel (10/03/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Pax (10/03/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/03/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Pax (10/03/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Pax (10/03/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba eleaticus (10/02/04)
- Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba Bill Hobba (10/02/04)
- L. Advanced SR-cult Idiocies and Corruption eleaticus (10/01/04)
- Re: Article: A Century of Einstein Eric Baird (10/01/04)