sci.physics.relativity
By Thread

3799 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 10/31/04
Ending: 11/21/04

• slashdotted - sr laser clock shevek (11/21/04)
  • Re: slashdotted - sr laser clock N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/21/04)
• Helical wave particles. Len Gaasenbeek (11/20/04)
  • Re: Helical wave particles. Androcles (11/20/04)
    • Re: Helical wave particles. Marcus Wellpoth (11/20/04)
      • Re: Helical wave particles. Androcles (11/21/04)
      • Re: Helical wave particles. Marcus Wellpoth (11/21/04)
• On the observation of a moving beam of light. kenneth couesbouc (11/20/04)
  • Re: On the observation of a moving beam of light. Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Lorentz Force alternative (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
  • Re: Lorentz Force alternative (kst) jahn (11/20/04)
• can anything at all fall into a black hole? plex (11/20/04)
  • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
  • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
    • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
  • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Eugene Shubert (11/20/04)
  • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Theo Wollenleben (11/20/04)
    • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? plex (11/21/04)
      • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Theo Wollenleben (11/20/04)
      • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
      • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
      • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
      • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
  • Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? MP (11/20/04)
• Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox eleaticus (11/20/04)
  • Re: Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox Uncle Al (11/20/04)
    • Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie eleaticus (11/20/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie Etaercq (11/20/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie Martin Hogbin (11/20/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie eleaticus (11/21/04)
• Under Peer Review at JHEP-Journal of High Energy Physics K_Loupspeed (11/19/04)
• Google SCHOLAR! Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
    • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Boris Mohar (11/20/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Evgenij Barsukov (11/19/04)
    • Re: Google SCHOLAR! John C. Polasek (11/20/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Maleki (11/19/04)
    • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Maleki (11/20/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! MP (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Androcles (11/19/04)
    • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! jahn (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Me (11/19/04)
  • Re: Google SCHOLAR! Marcus Wellpoth (11/20/04)
• A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
  • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/19/04)
    • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
      • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/20/04)
  • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
  • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Androcles (11/19/04)
    • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
      • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Androcles (11/19/04)
      • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/20/04)
    • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/20/04)
      • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
      • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Androcles (11/20/04)
      • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. The Ghost In The Machine (11/21/04)
  • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
    • Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/18/04)
  • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Peter Duniho (11/18/04)
    • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
      • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
      • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
      • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
      • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
    • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
  • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
  • Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. partners_at_mistral.net (11/20/04)
• Re: Alchemy Uncle Al (11/18/04)
  • Re: Alchemy Androcles (11/18/04)
• Infinite series are aproximations? Emil (11/18/04)
  • Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
  • Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
  • Re: Infinite series are aproximations? greywolf42 (11/18/04)
    • Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
  • Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Satya Das (11/18/04)
  • Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Androcles (11/18/04)
    • Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Tahcrq (11/18/04)
• New Web Site Dealing with Theoretical Physics(now is under construction) kiarash niknejad (11/18/04)
• For Sandra Smith about InfoRelation.com ada (11/18/04)
• www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS zetalimit (11/18/04)
  • Re: www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS Paul Cardinale (11/18/04)
• Granularity of SpaceTime? sanman (11/17/04)
• Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Lady Chatterly (11/17/04)
  • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Lady Chatterly (11/17/04)
• Re: Geometrodynamics of inertial force in flat spacetime Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
• Calling Tom Potter Justin Lewis (11/17/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/17/04)
  • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
    • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Titan Point (11/20/04)
  • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
    • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/17/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Bill Rowe (11/18/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/18/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Bill Rowe (11/19/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/18/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether stephen_at_nomail.com (11/18/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Androcles (11/20/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether jahn (11/20/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Eric Gisse (11/20/04)
    • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
  • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/17/04)
    • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/17/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/18/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/18/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/18/04)
    • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/20/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/20/04)
      • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether stephen_at_nomail.com (11/20/04)
  • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether TomGee (11/20/04)
• Re: effect of high speed of electron on current amitmishra (11/17/04)
  • Re: effect of high speed of electron on current amitmishra (11/17/04)
  • Re: effect of high speed of electron on current Paul Cardinale (11/18/04)
  • Re: effect of high speed of electron on current Bilge (11/18/04)
• RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Raheman Velji (11/17/04)
  • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
  • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
  • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
  • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED jem (11/17/04)
  • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Harry (11/18/04)
    • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED robert j. kolker (11/18/04)
      • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Harry (11/19/04)
    • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Androcles (11/18/04)
      • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Titan Point (11/19/04)
  • Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
• How to build a time-machine ? ? ? Hans-Marc Olsen (11/17/04)
  • Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
    • Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? The Ghost In The Machine (11/17/04)
  • Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
  • Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
• God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/17/04)
  • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Titan Point (11/17/04)
    • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/17/04)
  • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Lits O'Hate (11/17/04)
    • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/18/04)
      • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/18/04)
      • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Lits O'Hate (11/18/04)
  • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Eric Gisse (11/17/04)
  • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
  • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy bv_schornak (11/19/04)
    • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/20/04)
      • Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy bv_schornak (11/20/04)
• Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/16/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Marcus Wellpoth (11/17/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Uncle Al (11/17/04)
    • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Androcles (11/17/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/17/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Y.Porat (11/17/04)
    • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Y.Porat (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Garbi (11/18/04)
      • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/19/04)
  • Re: Time is a Property of Matter? ZZBunker (11/17/04)
• Re: Mathematics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... ueb (11/16/04)
  • Re: Mathematics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... ueb (11/17/04)
• Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/16/04)
  • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Marcus Wellpoth (11/16/04)
    • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
  • Re: Have you ever wondered..... ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
    • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
  • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/17/04)
    • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... jem (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Rowe (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Rowe (11/20/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... stephen_at_nomail.com (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... stephen_at_nomail.com (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... stephen_at_nomail.com (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/20/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Daniel Weston (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
  • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
    • Re: Have you ever wondered..... greywolf42 (11/17/04)
    • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Obfuscated Ambiguities. Daniel Weston (11/19/04)
      • Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. Daniel Weston (11/19/04)
      • Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. Daniel Weston (11/19/04)
      • Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
      • Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. jem (11/20/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... jem (11/20/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... xxein (11/19/04)
      • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
  • Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky K_Loupspeed (11/16/04)
  • Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
    • Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky Marcus Wellpoth (11/16/04)
      • Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
    • Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
  • what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky-Bill Hobba K_Loupspeed (11/17/04)
    • Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky-Bill Hobba Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
• MAN AS DUMB AS COAL - Ed Conrad [Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Daedalus (11/16/04)
  • Re: MAN AS DUMB AS COAL - Ed Conrad [Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park dISC JoKeY (11/17/04)
• Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Richard S. Westmoreland (11/16/04)
  • Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Androcles (11/16/04)
  • Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Chadwick Stone© (11/16/04)
  • Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
  • Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Marc Granby (11/17/04)
• Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
  • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/16/04)
    • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
      • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
      • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/17/04)
      • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
    • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Marten (11/18/04)
  • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Titan Point (11/16/04)
    • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
      • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup EjP (11/16/04)
      • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
      • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Titan Point (11/17/04)
      • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/17/04)
  • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
    • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
      • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
  • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
    • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/17/04)
      • Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
• Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (11/16/04)
  • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Androcles (11/17/04)
• (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (11/16/04)
  • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
• Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (11/16/04)
  • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (11/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Titan Point (11/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
• Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (11/16/04)
  • Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Uncle Al (11/16/04)
    • Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Androcles (11/17/04)
• Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/15/04)
  • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
    • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality jahn (11/15/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/17/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/17/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/17/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality anon (11/16/04)
    • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Tom Roberts (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality greywolf42 (11/16/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality greywolf42 (11/17/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
      • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/18/04)
  • Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Paul B. Andersen (11/16/04)
• Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/15/04)
  • Re: Conceptualization test. Dirk Van de moortel (11/15/04)
    • Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
  • Re: Conceptualization test. Bilge (11/16/04)
    • Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
  • Re: Conceptualization test. Titan Point (11/16/04)
    • Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
      • Re: Conceptualization test. Daniel Weston (11/16/04)
      • Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
      • Re: Conceptualization test. Daniel Weston (11/16/04)
      • Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
      • Re: Conceptualization test. Daniel Weston (11/16/04)
      • Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
      • Re: Ping Danny Boy! AllYou! (11/19/04)
  • Re: Conceptualization test. greywolf42 (11/16/04)
    • Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Let.s fight against InfoRelation - spamming service!!! inforelation55 (11/15/04)
• How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. joseph levy (11/15/04)
  • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
    • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/16/04)
      • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
      • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
      • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Titan Point (11/19/04)
      • Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/19/04)
• A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/15/04)
  • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/15/04)
    • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/15/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
    • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/15/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/15/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/17/04)
    • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/16/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/16/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/17/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/18/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/18/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/18/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/18/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/18/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/19/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/19/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/20/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/20/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/20/04)
  • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/15/04)
    • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/16/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/17/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/17/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/19/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/19/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/19/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/20/04)
  • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Bilge (11/16/04)
    • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/15/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Bilge (11/16/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/16/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Bilge (11/16/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/16/04)
  • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Len Gaasenbeek (11/16/04)
    • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/16/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Len Gaasenbeek (11/17/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/17/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c David Evens (11/19/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/19/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/19/04)
      • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
  • Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Max Keon (11/17/04)
• Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/15/04)
  • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
    • Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/16/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Patrick Reany (11/18/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/18/04)
    • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/17/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/18/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/19/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry analog57_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
  • Re: Universal Metasymmetry ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
    • Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/19/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry analog57_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
      • Re: Universal Metasymmetry ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/21/04)
• Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. mike3 (11/15/04)
• Re: Retic Postings and SPAM Bilge (11/15/04)
• Defining Terms Margaret Kelso (11/15/04)
  • Re: Defining Terms Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Zeno Margaret Kelso (11/15/04)
  • Re: Zeno Androcles (11/15/04)
• Re: The *REAL* story of co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
  • Re: The *REAL* story of co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
• Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy ZZBunker (11/14/04)
    • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy EL (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Androcles (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Mike (11/14/04)
    • Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy David Evens (11/15/04)
• Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
    • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Morituri-Max (11/14/04)
      • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
      • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Morituri-Max (11/14/04)
      • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
• Newton's Principia: Definitions: I - IV Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
  • Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: I - IV Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
• Bomb paradox mtm (11/14/04)
  • Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
    • Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/14/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/14/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/15/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/15/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox Martin Hogbin (11/16/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
    • Re: Bomb paradox Benno Muilwyk (11/14/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox Benno Muilwyk (11/14/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/15/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/15/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
  • Re: Bomb paradox Martin Hogbin (11/14/04)
  • Re: Bomb paradox Benno Muilwyk (11/14/04)
  • Re: Bomb paradox eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
    • Re: Bomb paradox eleaticus (11/20/04)
      • Re: Bomb paradox Androcles (11/20/04)
• Corrected Lecture 1 on Metric Engineering Stargates and Warp Drive Jack Sarfatti (11/14/04)
  • Re: Corrected Lecture 1 on Metric Engineering Stargates and Warp Drive Ken S. Tucker (11/15/04)
• Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/13/04)
  • Re: Confusion about time. jahn (11/13/04)
    • Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/14/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Androcles (11/14/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. jahn (11/14/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/15/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/15/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Dirk Van de moortel (11/15/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/15/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/18/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Androcles (11/15/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. jahn (11/14/04)
  • Re: Confusion about time. Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
    • Re: Confusion about time. Dirk Van de moortel (11/13/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. jahn (11/14/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Androcles (11/15/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. AllYou! (11/15/04)
    • Re: Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/15/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
    • Re: Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/18/04)
  • Re: Confusion about time. Androcles (11/14/04)
  • Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/14/04)
    • Re: Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/18/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/20/04)
  • Re: Confusion about time. Bilge (11/15/04)
  • Re: Confusion about time. AllYou! (11/15/04)
    • Re: Confusion about time. Dirk Van de moortel (11/15/04)
      • Re: Confusion about time. AllYou! (11/15/04)
• Sarfatti Lectures on Metric Engineering of Warp, Wormhole & WMD (W^3) Jack Sarfatti (11/13/04)
• Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy xxein (11/13/04)
  • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
  • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy MP (11/13/04)
    • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy xxein (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy MP (11/14/04)
• Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/13/04)
  • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
    • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Daniel Weston (11/13/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/14/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/15/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/16/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation AllYou! (11/16/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup Patrick Reany (11/17/04)
      • Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/17/04)
      • Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. Patrick Reany (11/18/04)
      • Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/18/04)
      • Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. Patrick Reany (11/19/04)
      • Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/19/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
    • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation - first paradox eelgro (11/15/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation - first paradox Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation - first paradox Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
      • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation - first paradox Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
  • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
  • treply eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/14/04)
    • Re: treply N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
    • Re: treply Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
  • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/18/04)
  • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/18/04)
  • Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
• Re: Infinity or finity?? Paul Cardinale (11/13/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
  • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
    • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Rotidewq (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Jim Greenfield (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/16/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Jim Greenfield (11/17/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/20/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno The Ghost In The Machine (11/21/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/15/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno KlingvilleBill (11/14/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Eric Gisse (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
      • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
• Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Jason W. Hinson (11/12/04)
  • Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ V ertner Vergon (11/14/04)
  • Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Twittering One (11/15/04)
• Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/11/04)
  • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/12/04)
    • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/12/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Paul B. Andersen (11/12/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Dirk Van de moortel (11/12/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time AllYou! (11/15/04)
    • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/16/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Dirk Van de moortel (11/16/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/16/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/17/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/16/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/17/04)
    • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/17/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/17/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/17/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/18/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/18/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/18/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/18/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/18/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/19/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/19/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/19/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
  • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/12/04)
  • Re: Detecting Space-Time suzysewnshow (11/13/04)
  • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/13/04)
    • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/13/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/13/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/14/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/13/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/14/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/14/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/14/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/14/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/15/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/15/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/15/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/15/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/15/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/15/04)
      • Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
• Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Ja Lar (11/11/04)
  • Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Androcles (11/11/04)
• Einstein: Release of Volume 9, The Berlin Years Ron (11/10/04)
• On the use of definitions in discussing physics AllYou! (11/10/04)
  • Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics robert j. kolker (11/10/04)
    • Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics Dirk Van de moortel (11/10/04)
      • Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics AllYou! (11/10/04)
  • Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
    • Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics AllYou! (11/10/04)
      • Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
      • Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics AllYou! (11/11/04)
• Non Abelian Universe? Russell E. Rierson (11/10/04)
• Non Abelian Universe? Russell E. Rierson (11/10/04)
• Gravitational Time Sam. Mitchell (11/10/04)
  • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
    • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. jahn (11/10/04)
      • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
  • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (11/10/04)
  • Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Eric Gisse (11/10/04)
• Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Mitchell (11/10/04)
  • Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
    • Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Fred McGalliard (11/11/04)
      • Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Mitchell (11/12/04)
      • Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Mitchell (11/12/04)
      • Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Dr. Photon (11/12/04)
      • Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Fred McGalliard (11/18/04)
  • Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Crown-Horned Snorkack (11/10/04)
  • Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/12/04)
• Einstein Revolutionary Theater Lazy Dog Society Jack Sarfatti (11/10/04)
  • Re: Einstein Revolutionary Theater Lazy Dog Society Ken S. Tucker (11/10/04)
    • Re: Einstein Revolutionary Theater Lazy Dog Society Smokey (11/10/04)
• Question about change-of-basis bars Paul (11/09/04)
  • Re: Question about change-of-basis bars Jon Hurwitz (11/13/04)
• Re: Universe = Mind Thalassa (11/09/04)
• Re Einstein (1905) Absurdities Adrian Mark Armstrong (11/09/04)
  • Re: Re Einstein (1905) Absurdities Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
• Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Bilge (11/09/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) shevek (11/12/04)
    • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Bilge (11/12/04)
• Re: Big Bang Question nightbat (11/09/04)
• Re: Question about God=G_uv Athina Georgiadou (11/09/04)
  • Re: Question about God=G_uv Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
    • Re: Question about God=G_uv Moonshadao (11/09/04)
• New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation YBM (11/09/04)
  • Re: New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
  • Re: New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
  • Re: New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation Harry (11/11/04)
• Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
  • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Androcles (11/09/04)
    • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Eric Gisse (11/09/04)
  • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Bilge (11/09/04)
  • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? nospam (11/09/04)
    • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (11/09/04)
  • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? V ertner Vergon (11/11/04)
    • Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Greysky (11/12/04)
• Meaning of "weight" in general relativity Jack Sarfatti (11/08/04)
  • Re: Meaning of "weight" in general relativity Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
• Why is the speed of light as it is Alex C.P (11/08/04)
  • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
  • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/08/04)
  • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Androcles (11/08/04)
    • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/08/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Igor (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Dirk Van de moortel (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Dirk Van de moortel (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/09/04)
  • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is greywolf42 (11/08/04)
  • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Ron ++++++ (11/08/04)
    • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
    • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
    • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Alex C.P (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Bilge (11/09/04)
    • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Bilge (11/09/04)
  • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
  • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is FrediFizzx (11/09/04)
  • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is John C. Polasek (11/09/04)
  • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/09/04)
    • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/13/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/14/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/14/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/15/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/15/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/16/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is The Ghost In The Machine (11/17/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/16/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Ken Seto (11/17/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/18/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Titan Point (11/19/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
      • Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/19/04)
• Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/08/04)
  • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/08/04)
  • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Tom Roberts (11/08/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Tom Roberts (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Patrick Reany (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Titan Point (11/08/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
  • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/08/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> The Ghost In The Machine (11/09/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Dirk Van de moortel (11/09/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/09/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> The Ghost In The Machine (11/10/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Tom Roberts (11/10/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/10/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Dirk Van de moortel (11/10/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Tom Roberts (11/08/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> David Park (11/08/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> xxein (11/09/04)
  • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> shevek (11/08/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> shevek (11/09/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/09/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> MP (11/09/04)
      • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/09/04)
  • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> tfleming1_at_hotkey.net.au (11/09/04)
    • Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/09/04)
• WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler (11/08/04)
  • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Moderate Mammal (11/08/04)
    • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Moderate Mammal (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Moderate Mammal (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Packrat® (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bunn E. Rabbit (11/09/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/09/04)
  • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/08/04)
    • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 SueNet (11/08/04)
    • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 K. A. Cannon (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 SueNet (11/09/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Aratzio (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ross (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 K. A. Cannon (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone© (11/09/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
  • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 SueNet (11/08/04)
    • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Meat Plow (11/09/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/10/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/10/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Meat Plow (11/11/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/11/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/12/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/14/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/14/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/15/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/15/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/16/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/16/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone© (11/12/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/14/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bookman (11/14/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/14/04)
    • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ross (11/08/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 SueNet (11/09/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Vampi Fangs (11/09/04)
      • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Meat Plow (11/09/04)
  • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Justice-for-all (11/08/04)
    • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
    • Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE The Observer (11/13/04)