Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'?

From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (ahmed.ouahi_at_welho.com)
Date: 11/01/04 

Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 06:17:14 +0200

............. ...However, basically, along that matter could be open an
other alternative which it would be a susceptible along an adequation to an
objective resolution along that matter of that confusion. Therefore, which
it would be a just a thought regulation. However, to attain to anything
along any attempt, it would be a wonderful clarification, when we should
turn around the source of the thought. Therefore, when we do have to get any
regulation along the thought, which is a naturally the database along that
subject.

............ ...For the time being, from where it does blows up the
thought scientifically or a biologically precisely. Along that moment, we
can find that it is from the brain. Then, however, we do have to turn around
the brain, whether, we do know, that none along the humans knows much about
the brain. But we do know, that it contains two parts or precisely two
hemispheres, the left and the right. However, it is already known -or
unknown- that the both hemispheres have a different functions.

........... ...Therefore, the left hemisphere is a simply for ordering
and organizing any infinitesimal detail turning around and however, the
right is for a perceiving anything which it crosses any detail and also and
a systematically for any intuitive detail which it can be a most of the time
missing. For the simple reason, that the most of a people, does not use the
both hemispheres, which it does makes ready to look for any conflicts along
any detail outside of the them, when in reality the conflict resides inside
of them naturally. However, sometime, when it happened that somebody can be
having naturally the ability to use the both sides, it is a definitely
called the imagination, which is an other and a different story, which it
can usually creates a categoric separation to people as it can allow them to
look for the conflicts outside of them.

.......... ...However, in the meantime, when we do get the point, we can
find that the philosophy and a mathematics are a just a matter of an
accomplishement to one an other, whether, we do know, that it is not a
possible to attain the generality, and this is the nature and what is all
about, definitely as a matter a
fact!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!............................. ... 

-- 
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!
"shuba" <tim.shuba@lycos.ScPoAmM> kirjoitti viestissä
news:tim.shuba-3C168D.20535031102004@news.individual.net...
> Bilge wrote:
>
> >  Patrick Reany:
> >  >Request for comments:
> >  >
> >  >Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? In
> >  >other words, is the language of physics equal to, less than, or
> >  >greater than mathematics?
> >
> >    You post the most bizarre questions. The `language of physics',
> > is what ever physicsts find to be useful as a language of physics.
> > While a lot of physics is rather mathematical, mathematicians and
> > physicists do not generally have the same motivation for the way
> > they use that math. So, my guess is that the official language of
> > physics is ``math that tends to make mathematicians wince.''
>
> Nicely put.  A similar statement could describe the more
> philosophical aspects of physics.  This is yet another case of
> Chairman Reany demanding an exact definition of a term, in this
> case "language of physics", and missing the point again.
>
>
>          ---Tim Shuba---

Relevant Pages

  • Curved space-time?
    ... I'm familiar with elementary physics but I never got into the heavy ... how do you fuse/combine space (the general absence of matter) ... something (much like a liquid in a container)? ... these issues without having to resort to mathematics, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Natural selection and favorable traits how were they measured ?
    ... and matter, the Logos or Language. ... Since there was no matter or human observers of physics before Christ ... observations not laws, there is no such thing as a law of physics). ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Proof there exists a soul
    ... >>> Then why does theoretical physics ever correctly predict applied ... But most of mathematics corresponds to absolutely nothing in nature. ... materialists. ... Matter doesn't actually exist, fields do.) ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: distance to the ground
    ... between mathematics and mathematical physics. ... The geoid is -physically- defined, ... is just a matter of increased accuracy. ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: A Simplified Number System
    ... Are the operators used in maths a language all ... study of infinite-dimensional spaces and operators ... pp616, Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics ...
    (sci.lang)