Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong .......
From: Eric Gisse (fsegg_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Twin Paradox in non-trivial spatial topologies"
- Previous message: Eric Baird: "Re: SR, curvature terms, and Realms of Validity"
- In reply to: Henri Wilson: "Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ......."
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ......."
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ......."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 31 Oct 2004 21:49:00 -0800
H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<crnao0ti5mlnj2e75185h1k3pr4mkqns2m@4ax.com>...
> On 29 Oct 2004 09:37:50 -0700, titanpoint@yahoo.com (Titan Point) wrote:
>
> >H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<6ne1o05f4ml8vs8fffqmqd6k09bh6b3ogt@4ax.com>...
> >> On 28 Oct 2004 01:39:31 -0700, titanpoint@yahoo.com (Titan Point) wrote:
> >>
> >> >H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<m780o01r64c36f6rc53ljm80tcvgtqvncp@4ax.com>...
> >> >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:08:43 GMT, Bill Rowe <readnewscix@earthlink.net.invalid>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In article <mp0rn0luu869k5au65n99n1aua44vd4pe6@4ax.com>,
> >> >> > H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> As far as I can see, Einstein's version of relativity was never taken
> >> >> >> seriously outside of the USA and GB. It is a western hoax,
> >> >> >> perpetuated by generations of academic inbreeding.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >This merely demonstrates your myopic view. I am certain the Galileo
> >> >> >system planned by ESA will definitely make use of relativity just as the
> >> >> >US GPS system. Additionally, I believe the Russians also built a system
> >> >> >similar to GPS which also must have considered relativity. So, your idea
> >> >> >relativity is taken seriously by just the US and GB is simply fantasy.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm sure the orbiting clocks will be software adjusted so that they will be in
> >> >> synch with the ground clocks.
> >> >>
> >> >> HW.
> >> >
> >> >Why should that happen, unless they were going out of synchronization
> >> >due to motion and position in the Earth's gravitational field?
> >>
> >> Clocks change rates slightly when relieved of gravitational self compresion
> >> They are also affected by cutting the Earths fields.
> >
> >Is this the best you can come up with?
> >
> >How does "graviational self-compression" affect the transition between
> >energy levels of an electron in a caesium atom? Please quantify with
> >actual mathematics and data of this so-called effect.
> >
> >Otherwise people might think you were just making this up.
>
>
> GPS clocks are observed to change rates when placed into orbit, AS MEASURED BY
> THE ORIGINAL OBSERVER IN THE ORIGINAL FRAME. This is obviously a REAL
> physical/mechanical change.
Looks like Myxo forced some information into you. This does not bode
well for the theory of compactified dementia...
>
> PLease explain why you think a mathematical equation can alter the rate of a
> clock?
Please explain why you think a computer program can alter the action
of a binary star.
>
>
> HW.
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
- Next message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Twin Paradox in non-trivial spatial topologies"
- Previous message: Eric Baird: "Re: SR, curvature terms, and Realms of Validity"
- In reply to: Henri Wilson: "Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ......."
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ......."
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ......."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|