Re: Corpuscular Photons
From: jahn (suzysewnshow_at_yahoo.com.au)
Date: 11/05/04
- Next message: Mike: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- Previous message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: OK"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Corpuscular Photons"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Corpuscular Photons"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Corpuscular Photons"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Corpuscular Photons"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 06:16:23 -0500
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:mYHid.12090$Hj6.444477@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
>
> "jahn" <suzysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:2v0uhuF2f8bk6U1@uni-berlin.de...
> > Millikan? Who also worked on the photoelectric effect.
> > >
> > > Yep. Go to the top of class.
> > << In this Einstein seems to be assuming, that there are no other
> > sources of energy for the electrons. Thus he actually makes the
> > prediction that there is a maximum energy of photo-emission although he
> > covers himself against all eventualities with the condition I have
> > highlighted above. >>
>
> Are you talking to your Dennis McCarthy-self or to your self-self?
>
> Dirk Vdm
>
>
I'm not talking to anybody so daft at physics as to confuse my posts with Dennis. If you had half an inkiling about the topics
you'd know the difference. No offense to Dennis but I am starting to wonder if he is your long lost lover. He is all I have ever
seen you post about.
Nice puddle "puppy" but I've seen you pee more than that.
ROFL
Sue...
- Next message: Mike: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- Previous message: Paul B. Andersen: "Re: OK"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Corpuscular Photons"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Corpuscular Photons"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Corpuscular Photons"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Corpuscular Photons"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
