Re: Basics series proposed
From: Eric Gisse (fsegg_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 11/06/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The Nature of Mass"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge"
- In reply to: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- Next in thread: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- Reply: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 6 Nov 2004 06:43:33 -0800
greenfield_7@hotmail.com (Jim Greenfield) wrote in message news:<3c4afb26.0411052350.7bbcd60e@posting.google.com>...
> fsegg@uaf.edu (Eric Gisse) wrote in message news:<fd0fc2fa.0411051408.510d667f@posting.google.com>...
> > Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cmfl34$qnv$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> > > Jim Greenfield wrote:
> > > > Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cmd3ta$8el$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> > > >
> > > >>Jim Greenfield wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<cma92o$bq2$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > snip
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>For the fifth time: are the points moving right from the start, or are
> > > >>they accelerated first? Despite your constant denials, that makes a
> > > >>difference!!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And for about the fifteenth (in various forms), show where, in
> > > > Lorentz, Fitzgerald, AE or anyone else you like to quote for the
> > > > formulae "showing" length reduction along the line of travel, is
> > > > ACELLERATION mentioned?
> > >
> > > And also for the fifth time: SR is only valid for *inertial* systems. As
> > > soon there is acceleration, the calculations become *different*.
> >
> > What about constant acceleration?
> >
> > *wonders*
> >
> > So finding the components of acceleration in SR was just otherwise
> > useless exercise in calculus and the chain rule?
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bye,
> > > Bjoern
>
> As for other: there was NO accelleration pertinent to these
> calculations, either previous or present.
>
> Jim G
> c'=c+v
Simple question: What do you call a change of velocity?
Hint: It starts with "a" and ends in "cceleration".
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The Nature of Mass"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge"
- In reply to: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- Next in thread: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- Reply: Jim Greenfield: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
