Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark

From: David Evens (devens_at_technologist.com)
Date: 11/07/04 

Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 01:48:12 -0500

On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:20:50 -0600, "Eugene Shubert"
<http://www.everythingimportant.org> wrote:
>Eugene Shubert wrote
>http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=c45b45b3.0408092138.1d26efce@posting.google.com
>http://groups.google.com/groups?&selm=4177dd2e@sys13.hou.wt.net
>
>http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
>
>"David Evens" <devens@technologist.com> wrote in message
>news:ea6po0ptjnsn38tmd5ajrtj77ig3jpf5nk@4ax.com...
>> It was a discussion of that very paper, in which you grotesquely
>> distorted Pupetsock's lack of overt rejection of the products of
>> that open sewer you call a mind into a pretense that he supported
>> you that led to your admission that you feel free to distort
>> anything anyone says into a pretense that it is supportive.
>
>I call it effective rattling of a hostile witness. Any attorney worth
>is salt knows who to do that. The point that I was demonstrating was
>that Puppetsock had absolutely no understanding of my paper, even
>though he was commenting on it and pretending to have read it.

Current lies about what you weee doing then do not change the fact
that you fraudulently claims his support when it was actually him
pointing out how POOR the paper you don't understand actually is.

>If you believe that I was literally accepting Puppetsock's obviously
>insincere and thoughtless rejection as a favorable endorsement, then
>you need to reread his comments again and try to find a single strand
>of evidence that he read and actually understood my paper beyond the
>first paragraph.

Perhaps the fact that I already KNOW how well he understands the
material that you were gibbering about that leads me to not being able
to be required to go back to the posts you already admitted having
lied about.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark
    ... >> distorted Pupetsock's lack of overt rejection of the products of ... >> you that led to your admission that you feel free to distort ... >> anything anyone says into a pretense that it is supportive. ... that you fraudulently claims his support when it was actually him ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark
    ... Eugene Shubert wrote ... > distorted Pupetsock's lack of overt rejection of the products of ... > you that led to your admission that you feel free to distort ... > anything anyone says into a pretense that it is supportive. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark
    ... Eugene Shubert wrote ... > distorted Pupetsock's lack of overt rejection of the products of ... > you that led to your admission that you feel free to distort ... > anything anyone says into a pretense that it is supportive. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Leftists, Networks, News Media SILENT about Al-Qaeda Torture Chambers
    ... think that I distort things or the Moon is made of Cheese or WMD ... no evidence to support any accusations of "distortion" either here ... OPINION up ther is no point in continuing this. ...
    (soc.culture.iraq)
  • Re: Leftists, Networks, News Media SILENT about Al-Qaeda Torture Chambers
    ... think that I distort things or the Moon is made of Cheese or WMD are ... prepared to support your claim with evidence! ... to support any accusations of "distortion" either here or anywhere ...
    (soc.culture.iraq)