Re: Almost Everything is Expanding
From: nightbat (nightbat_at_home.ffni.com)
Date: 11/07/04
- Next message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- In reply to: EL: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Next in thread: MP: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 08:24:50 -0500
nightbat wrote
EL wrote:
>
> Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz>
> wrote in message news:<cmh305$jeu$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>...
>
> > According to many cosmologists, the expansion of the universe only
> > applies to scales above galactic clusters because all things below that
> > scale are gravitationally bound. Others say that GR has no such thing in
> > it and the expansion applies to all scales.
> >
> > Ray Tomes
> >
>
> [EL]
> I can hardly digest the fact that the majority of the educators who
> still sing
> "The Universe Is Expanding" song
> did not yet notice an elementary fact of condensation dynamics.
>
> Starting with an almost infinite and homogenous existence,
> a sample as big as our perceivable universe,
> must be "condensing" over time.
>
> ABC condensation, is that we have aggregation domains (of least energy
> content).
> Each "spatially-collapsing" sub-set of the main set logically means
> that the space between the sub-sets might be increasing.
> Try to visualize that the main set too is "spatially-collapsing" but
> due to the huge difference in the spatial order, the main set is
> "spatially-collapsing" at a much lower rate.
> This consequently must mean that even though all existence is
> "spatially-collapsing" the distance between the subsets' boundaries
> must be increasing due to the difference of the spatial-collapse-rate
> between the main set and its subsets.
> That (accelerating increase of the outer galactic separation distance)
> means nothing more than that the galaxies are collapsing faster than
> the universe is bringing them together.
> So there is no expansion under a universally dominated gravitational
> spatial collapse.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> EL
nightbat
Brilliant El and the rest of the contributing fellows to this
thread, and yes, you are all finally grasping and seeing the Universe
through nightbat eyes. The present disturbed non uniform energy mass
field otherwise known as the ( Universe ) is attempting to base field
quantum energy normalize but is not able to in absence of equal or
greater effecting momentum. And you are correct in your reality
deducement EL except that Universe physical observed accelerating
increase is a real world observed 1/time Hubble factor but off set via
invisibly sub micro state quantum countered spatial-collapse-rate
between main observed set and its micro quantum sub sets. Therefore,
under a universally dominated gravitational spatial collapse field
understanding there is conservation to base uniform energy field always,
the missing space time quantum uniform field frame.
<---uniform energy---non uniform energy----uniform energy---->
Respectfully,
the nightbat
- Next message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- In reply to: EL: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Next in thread: MP: "Re: Almost Everything is Expanding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|