Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?
From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 11/08/04
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Definition of A Field"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- In reply to: Mike: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- Next in thread: greywolf42: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 01:13:25 GMT
"Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message
news:9c1b39be.0411070829.6df325a6@posting.google.com...
> Tom Roberts <tjroberts@lucent.com> wrote in message
news:<XTbjd.16902$Rf1.4943@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>...
>
> [snip]
> >
> > I think you do not know what you are talking about. The description you
> > give is not valid, or even close. Perhaps you should actually LEARN
> > something about GR before attempting to discuss it. Though I suspect
> > your problem is that you don't understand science in general.
> >
> >
>
> You just joined the club of those who resort to ad hominen attacks
> when cornered. You have failed to provide any justification of you
> "local" religion other than hand waiving and appeal to other's
> ignorance.
>
> I suspect your problem is that you are a parrot of books who cannot
> think for himself. I could give you a host of good references from
> respectable scientists, one at Princeton, that disagrees with you big
> time, but that doesn't worth the effort since you seem to be incapable
> of grasping essential concepts outside the reach of your parroting.
>
> Mike
In another part of this thread Gregory said:
'I never know whether your questions are genuine, or you're trying to pick a
fight. You assume such an air of authority in your Usenet discussions and
spam rotation that it's almost surprising that you'd think you have anything
left to learn.'
And you go and do a post that proves him right. The idea of a continuum
being composed of a large number of very small elements that goes over to a
continuum as they are made smaller is used extensively in many areas of
physics, science, and applied mathethmatics. It is the idea behind the
integral being the area under a curve. 15 year old beginning calculus
students understand it - but for some reason you do not.
Bill
>
>
>
> > Tom Roberts tjroberts@lucent.com
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Definition of A Field"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- In reply to: Mike: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- Next in thread: greywolf42: "Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|