Re: Is charge conserved between frames?
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 11/09/04
- Next message: AllYou!: "Re: Revised Hypothesis"
- Previous message: Moonshadao: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- In reply to: David: "Re: Is charge conserved between frames?"
- Next in thread: Pmb: "Re: Is charge conserved between frames?"
- Reply: Pmb: "Re: Is charge conserved between frames?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 09 Nov 2004 12:55:04 GMT
David:
>pmb_phy@yahoo.com (Pmb) wrote in message news:
>> But if its true that you don't drink then you have no excuse for
>> posting this pathetic nonsense that you're always posting. We all see
>> through your garbage bilgey ole boy. You're only fooling yourself.
>>
>> <snipped bilge's childish nonsense>
>
>I think it would be wonderful if Bilge sued you for liable.
In order to sue for libel and prevail here in the us, one has to
prove actual damages. That would require someone (1) to take pmb
seriously and (2) to actually matter. Since the chances of the first
condition being met are slim to none, no jury would ever believe any
argument that both conditions were met.
- Next message: AllYou!: "Re: Revised Hypothesis"
- Previous message: Moonshadao: "Re: Question about God=G_uv"
- In reply to: David: "Re: Is charge conserved between frames?"
- Next in thread: Pmb: "Re: Is charge conserved between frames?"
- Reply: Pmb: "Re: Is charge conserved between frames?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
