Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified?
From: Androcles (dummy_at_dummy.net)
Date: 11/11/04
- Next message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong?"
- In reply to: Ja Lar: "Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:16:37 GMT
"Ja Lar" <jalar@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:cn044b$vj3$1@news.net.uni-c.dk...
:
: "Lecnach" <lecnach@aol.com> ...
: <snip>
:
: > ... If anyone
: > provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively
answered, the
: > material at the Website will be withdrawn.
:
: Does this promise apply with an independent, objective evaluation
: ("opmand"), and does it extends to your posting in this (and other)
: newsgroups?
No, it doesn't.
Whenever you see a word spelled backwards (in this case "Cancel") and
usually
preceded with a letter at random, it is "EinsteinHoax" aka "H.E.Retic"
who repeatedly posts but makes no reply. I daresay he has lost his own
posts. Replying is a complete waste of time, he will not read it.
Androcles
- Next message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong?"
- In reply to: Ja Lar: "Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]