Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR

From: Henri Wilson (H_at_..(Henri)
Date: 11/14/04 

Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 23:05:24 GMT

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:42:03 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@deletethis.hia.no> wrote:

>Henri Wilson skrev:
>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:49:23 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"

>>>
>>>I see. So when the astronomers measure a K2 spectrum,
>>>that's really a misinterpreted spectrum of a "darker body"?
>>>And when the astronomers can see a B8 spectrum Doppler shifting
>>>sinusoidally with small amplitude, and a K2 spectrum Doppler
>>>shifting sinusoidally with opposite phase and with bigger
>>>amplitude, can you then explain why the CORRECT interpretation
>>>is that it is the spectrum of a SINGLE STAR orbiting a darker
>>>body with high eccentricity?
>>
>>
>> Why would I want to do that when it is obvious there are two stars involved
>> here.
>
>Henri Wilson wrote:
>| Algol type brightness curves are typical of
>| those expected under the ballistic
>| theory FOR SINGLE STARS orbiting a darker body.
>
>It IS hard to make up your mind, eh? :-)

Not at all.
The Algol type curve can result from EITHER one single star or two that are
eclipsing.
No wonder astronomers are confused.

>
>>>And when the astronomers can see a A8 spectrum,
>>>how can this be a misinterpreted spectrum of nothing?
>>>
>>>Please humour me, Henri.
>>>Explain these things which are so obvious to to you,
>>>but which my indoctrinated mind is unable to fathom.
>>>
>>>Creationist explains the observed age of the universe
>>>as "God created the universe old".
>>>Is there a similar effect explaining why all
>>>the evidence is against the Holy Ballistic Theory?
>>>A divine conspiracy to fool the scientists?
>>>But the True Believers will not be fooled, because
>>>they KNOW the Holy Ballistic Theory MUST be true
>>>whatever the evidence say?
>>
>>
>> All evidence points to it being correct...and you know it!
>
>Sure, Henry.
>Of course the Holy Ballistic Theory MUST be true
>whatever the evidence say.

Indeed it must.
Light speed is initially c relative to source. It stays that way until cetain
conditions are experienced in the space it traverses.
What happens subsequently is anyone's guess.

>
>
>Paul

HW.

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The true crackpots
    ... No scientific results show evidence for SR/GTR. ... | evidence of -- light and spectra shifts for various stars. ... |> there is a black hole running loose in the x-ray dept, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: (OT) Giving up on science [Was: Giving Up on Leopard]
    ... scripture (no matter what faith) is literally true. ... From a human scale perspective the stars are fixed. ... You've presented no evidence. ... religion was based on evidence, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: OK
    ... >of the very same reason I consider it proven that Cepheids ... >are pulsating stars. ... There is such overwhelming evidence in favour ... >I have noticed what make you laugh. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: revisiting Apollo
    ... I talked about camera pictures..should I have said ... stars don't appear in various forms of photography come back to the same ... When I was asked for proof I quoted the film. ... You also brought up Hollywood feature films as "evidence" that stars can be ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: DNA Testing for ancestry? (channel4)
    ... We base them on documentary evidence and not ... But it's all guesswork. ... This goes from 5 stars down to one or even nil, ... My most disputed ancestor has about 10 pieces of solid evidence in his favour ...
    (soc.genealogy.britain)