Re: evidence for the existence of the ether
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 11/17/04
- Next message: dseppala_at_austin.rr.com: "Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant?"
- In reply to: Dennis McCarthy: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- Next in thread: AllYou!: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- Reply: AllYou!: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:58:38 +0100
"Dennis McCarthy" <djmenck@aol.com> wrote in message news:20041117090050.21648.00000692@mb-m11.aol.com...
> Dear Dennis McCarthy:
>
> "Dennis McCarthy" <djmenck@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:68aae149.0410040758.73ebda15@posting.google.com...
> > "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
> > news:<2rvvi7F1es0m5U1@uni-berlin.de>...
Talking to yourself, Dennis Sue Jahn McCarthy?
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: dseppala_at_austin.rr.com: "Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant?"
- In reply to: Dennis McCarthy: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- Next in thread: AllYou!: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- Reply: AllYou!: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
