Re: Infinite series are aproximations?
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: Infinite series are aproximations?"
- Next in thread: Satya Das: "Re: Infinite series are aproximations?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:06:10 GMT
"greywolf42" <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote in message news:j95nd.2965$mu4.2475@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
> "Emil" <epleite@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:faef3d8d.0411180703.5f1b8c8@posting.google.com...
> > I've just read the text from this site:
> > http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TVFSeries.html
> >
> > Perhaps this is not the right NG to ask about this but I saw that the
> > context involved GTR.
> >
> > What is wrong in saying that expansions of functions into a infinite
> > series are technically "aproximations"? If one is comparing an
> > infinite series with an observation one must trucate the series
> > somewhere. To me this constitutes a "technical aproximation" (if by
> > technical we mean "practical") because no one can calculate infinity
> > terms of a series.
> >
> > Can someone explain to me what is so wrong about that statement? :-)
>
> There is nothing wrong with TVF's statement.
TVF is an idiot. Slightly less than you, but still a big idiot.
Proof allover in:
http://metaresearch.org/solar%20system/cydonia/proof_files/proof.asp
http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V10NO1PDF/V10N1TVF.pdf
http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp
>
> Don't take Dirk's site seriously. Dirk gets his jollies by posting claims
> that people that he doesn't like make mistakes.
Not simple mistakes, as you *very* wel know yourself.
Only mistakes made by arrogant ignorants, as you very well know:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Apandora%2Ebe+mingst
You are a fossil - get used to it.
Dirk Vdm
> More often than not (as in
> this case), the "error" is simply Dirk's misunderstading of the subject.
> Apparently, Dirk feels that if he claims that things are errors, and posts
> them as such on his website, that everyone will agree with him.
>
> --
> greywolf42
> ubi dubium ibi libertas
> {remove planet for e-mail}
>
>
>
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: Infinite series are aproximations?"
- Next in thread: Satya Das: "Re: Infinite series are aproximations?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
