Re: Infinite series are aproximations?
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Martin Hogbin: "Re: A simple test of the constancy of c"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: Detecting Space-Time"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Infinite series are aproximations?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:03:58 GMT
"Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net> wrote in message news:9c6nd.3502$08.347@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "Emil" <epleite@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:faef3d8d.0411180703.5f1b8c8@posting.google.com...
> : I've just read the text from this site:
> :
> http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TVFSeries.html
> :
> : Perhaps this is not the right NG to ask about this but I saw that
> the
> : context involved GTR.
> :
> : What is wrong in saying that expansions of functions into a infinite
> : series are technically "aproximations"? If one is comparing an
> : infinite series with an observation one must trucate the series
> : somewhere. To me this constitutes a "technical aproximation" (if by
> : technical we mean "practical") because no one can calculate infinity
> : terms of a series.
> :
> : Can someone explain to me what is so wrong about that statement? :-)
> :
> : Emil.
> Usually (not always) the series approaches a limit.
Do stay away from mathematics as far as you can, imbecile.
Androcles and equations:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ToothlessBite.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Competent.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/UseTrans.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Sheesh.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SetSolve.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DivZero.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Think.html
Androcles and square roots:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/CanSpecify.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Nearly.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Quadratic.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GrowUp.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Tautology.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Material.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GIVEN.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PythagoRescue.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtRev.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NegSqrt.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtAnswers.html
Androcles and exclusive ors:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Gibberish.html
Androcles and partial differential equations:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff2.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff3.html
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: Martin Hogbin: "Re: A simple test of the constancy of c"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: Detecting Space-Time"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Infinite series are aproximations?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|