Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities.
From: Daniel Weston (daniel009_at_webtv.net)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: jahn: "Re: Google SCHOLAR!"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: Detecting Space-Time"
- In reply to: AllYou!: "Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities."
- Next in thread: AllYou!: "Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities."
- Reply: AllYou!: "Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities."
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:21:04 -0800
AllYou: A) SEPARATION, and B) DURATION, AND C) SWIFTNESS have common
dictionary definitions. Look them up.
If X has changed its position from p1 to p2, what is the meaning of the
phrase that the value of the motion is 50 hours?
You should use an opportunity such as I have given you here, to massage
your theory as well as to improve its presentation. Instead you are
becoming incredibly defensive. You have the burden of proof. It is up
to you my friend. There are some pretty smart people on this ng, and
slurred speech will not get you very far.
- Next message: jahn: "Re: Google SCHOLAR!"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: Detecting Space-Time"
- In reply to: AllYou!: "Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities."
- Next in thread: AllYou!: "Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities."
- Reply: AllYou!: "Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities."
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|