Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies.
From: Henri Wilson (H_at_..(Henri)
Date: 11/20/04
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Universal Metasymmetry"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies."
- Next in thread: Titan Point: "Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 07:46:02 GMT
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:59:52 GMT, "Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net> wrote:
>
>"Henri Wilson" <H@..> wrote in message
>news:knnsp0197llpn53rcqvesq8hgsqpsigoua@4ax.com...
>: On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:15:34 GMT, "Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net>
>wrote:
>:
>: >
>: >"Henri Wilson" <H@..> wrote in message
>: >news:q3gqp0d0iljmjced6jche4vhsll5r15ia2@4ax.com...
>: >: Two observers with clocks are on the ground. They have counters
>that
>: >: continuously register 'ticks' from an orbiting GPS clock.
>: >:
>: >: When the GPS clock is directly above them, they both start their
>: >counters. One
>: >: observer takes off instantly in a plane and flies (very rapidly)
>so
>: >that he is
>: >: always directly under the satellite clock.
>: >
>: >12 hours to circumnavigate the Earth isn't all that fast, H.
>: >
>: >Let's put another observer at a geostationary comm satellite so
>that
>: >they sandwich the GPS observer. Tell you what....
>: >I'll be the ground observer, you can be the comsat observer by
>proxy
>: >and we'll tick-talk to each other as Andersen tick-tocks his way
>past
>: >out communucation beam... Oh... wait... We are already doing it!
>: >That's what the internet is all about!
>: >This isn't a fairy tale any more, the GPS is real, communication
>: >satellites
>: >are real, Concorde that could manage to fly under a GPS satellite,
>: >did so for 30 years and has been scrapped.
>: >
>: >: After two revolutions, the two observes are again together and
>: >directly under
>: >: the satellite clock. They both instantly stop their counters and
>: >compare
>: >: results.
>: >:
>: >: What answers do they get?
>: >
>: >
>: >Idiotic ones if you ask a relativist, he'll refer you to Hafele and
>: >Keating,
>: >sensible ones if you ask anyone capable of reason.
>:
>: I don't think the Einsteinian fundamentalists can even understand
>the question,
>: A.
>
>For sure Andersen couldn't. I've dumped his new email address into my
>kill-file. He is totally insane. He really believes Algol's system is
>within the Roche envelope and a stream of matter is pouring from the
>greater star to the lesser. That is also the same supposed mechanism
>for recurrent novae.
They will go to any extreme when trying to explain astonomical observations
with Einsteiniana.
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Universal Metasymmetry"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies."
- Next in thread: Titan Point: "Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]