Re: Helical wave particles.
From: Androcles (dummy_at_dummy.net)
Date: 11/21/04
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- In reply to: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Helical wave particles."
- Next in thread: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Helical wave particles."
- Reply: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Helical wave particles."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:38:04 GMT
"Marcus Wellpoth" <wellpoth@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:419fcb2a$0$16046$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net...
> Androcles wrote:
>> due to its spin frequency = (4u^2)/5 (m)(r^2)(f^2)
>>
>> How did you derive the constant 0.8(pi^2), Len?
>>
>>
>>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> There we got both of them.
> Which one is more stupid?
>
> mw
You, of course :)
Androcles
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals"
- In reply to: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Helical wave particles."
- Next in thread: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Helical wave particles."
- Reply: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Helical wave particles."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]