sci.physics.relativity
By Date

3799 messages sorted by: [ thread ]

---

Starting: 10/31/04
Ending: 11/21/04

• Re: Helical wave particles. Marcus Wellpoth (11/21/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? plex (11/21/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/21/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie eleaticus (11/21/04)
• Re: slashdotted - sr laser clock N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/21/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. The Ghost In The Machine (11/21/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno The Ghost In The Machine (11/21/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/21/04)
• Re: Helical wave particles. Androcles (11/21/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/21/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/21/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/21/04)
• slashdotted - sr laser clock shevek (11/21/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether TomGee (11/20/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie Martin Hogbin (11/20/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/20/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving beam of light. Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: Helical wave particles. Marcus Wellpoth (11/20/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! Marcus Wellpoth (11/20/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? MP (11/20/04)
• Re: Helical wave particles. Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/20/04)
• Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. ZZBunker (11/20/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/20/04)
• Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/20/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. partners_at_mistral.net (11/20/04)
• Re: Lorentz Force alternative (kst) jahn (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field ueb (11/20/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether stephen_at_nomail.com (11/20/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Titan Point (11/20/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/20/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. stephen_at_nomail.com (11/20/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Titan Point (11/20/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! Maleki (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Theo Wollenleben (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
• Helical wave particles. Len Gaasenbeek (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this shuba (11/20/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! Boris Mohar (11/20/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
• On the observation of a moving beam of light. kenneth couesbouc (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! John C. Polasek (11/20/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie Etaercq (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/20/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Theo Wollenleben (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. jem (11/20/04)
• Lorentz Force alternative (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... jem (11/20/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Eric Gisse (11/20/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/20/04)
• Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Eric Gisse (11/20/04)
• Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/20/04)
• can anything at all fall into a black hole? plex (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/20/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/20/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/20/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Henri Wilson (11/20/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/20/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry analog57_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry analog57_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/20/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether jahn (11/20/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Eugene Shubert (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Rowe (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• Re: Bomb paradox Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: Bomb paradox eleaticus (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
• Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
• Re: Bomb paradox eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
• Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy bv_schornak (11/20/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/20/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/20/04)
• Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie eleaticus (11/20/04)
• Re: Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox Uncle Al (11/20/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Horizon Geons shuba (11/20/04)
• Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
• Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox eleaticus (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Androcles (11/20/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/20/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Patrick Reany (11/19/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! Me (11/19/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/19/04)
• Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/19/04)
• Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. J.E. (11/19/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Androcles (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/19/04)
• Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/19/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Androcles (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. Daniel Weston (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... stephen_at_nomail.com (11/19/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... stephen_at_nomail.com (11/19/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! jahn (11/19/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/19/04)
• Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. Daniel Weston (11/19/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/19/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/19/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
• Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... stephen_at_nomail.com (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/19/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! Androcles (11/19/04)
• Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! MP (11/19/04)
• Obfuscated Ambiguities. Daniel Weston (11/19/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/19/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! Maleki (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
• Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. Patrick Reany (11/19/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! Evgenij Barsukov (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
• Under Peer Review at JHEP-Journal of High Energy Physics K_Loupspeed (11/19/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy bv_schornak (11/19/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
• Re: Google SCHOLAR! robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
• Google SCHOLAR! Uncle Al (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Aleksandr Timofeev (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Creighton Hogg (11/19/04)
• Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Gregory L. Hansen (11/19/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
• Re: Ping Danny Boy! AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Androcles (11/19/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/19/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Horizon Geons Dreamer (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/19/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Androcles (11/19/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/19/04)
• Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Titan Point (11/19/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Titan Point (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Titan Point (11/19/04)
• SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
• Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Titan Point (11/19/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Harry (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/19/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/19/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c David Evens (11/19/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this xxein (11/19/04)
• Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
• final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... xxein (11/19/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Rowe (11/19/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Bill Rowe (11/19/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
• A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Uncle Al (11/19/04)
• Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Garbi (11/18/04)
• Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Peter Duniho (11/18/04)
• Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/18/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/18/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/18/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
• Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/18/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
• Re: Alchemy Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Lits O'Hate (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/18/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Daniel Weston (11/18/04)
• Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/18/04)
• Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: Alchemy Uncle Al (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/18/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/18/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether stephen_at_nomail.com (11/18/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Satya Das (11/18/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/18/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/18/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/18/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/18/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/18/04)
• Re: Infinite series are aproximations? greywolf42 (11/18/04)
• Re: effect of high speed of electron on current Bilge (11/18/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field hanson (11/18/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field hanson (11/18/04)
• Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED robert j. kolker (11/18/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Harry (11/18/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
• Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
• Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/18/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. Harry (11/18/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. Harry (11/18/04)
• Infinite series are aproximations? Emil (11/18/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. Patrick Reany (11/18/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (11/18/04)
• How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Tahcrq (11/18/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/18/04)
• Re: www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS Paul Cardinale (11/18/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/18/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/18/04)
• Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... jem (11/18/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/18/04)
• New Web Site Dealing with Theoretical Physics(now is under construction) kiarash niknejad (11/18/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/18/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/18/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/18/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Y.Porat (11/18/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (11/18/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/18/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Y.Porat (11/18/04)
• For Sandra Smith about InfoRelation.com ada (11/18/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field David Evens (11/18/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/18/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/18/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/18/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/18/04)
• Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky-Bill Hobba Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Marten (11/18/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/18/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/18/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Justin Lewis (11/18/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/18/04)
• Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (11/18/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Bill Rowe (11/18/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/18/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/18/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/18/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/18/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/18/04)
• www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS zetalimit (11/18/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
• Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/18/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/18/04)
• Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/18/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/18/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Patrick Reany (11/18/04)
• Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/18/04)
• Re: effect of high speed of electron on current Paul Cardinale (11/18/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Creighton Hogg (11/18/04)
• Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Fred McGalliard (11/18/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/17/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
• Granularity of SpaceTime? sanman (11/17/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/17/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this shuba (11/17/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
• Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Lady Chatterly (11/17/04)
• Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Lady Chatterly (11/17/04)
• Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Edward Green (11/17/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality greywolf42 (11/17/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/17/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/17/04)
• Re: Geometrodynamics of inertial force in flat spacetime Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Creighton Hogg (11/17/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? sal (11/17/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Eric Gisse (11/17/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (11/17/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
• Calling Tom Potter Justin Lewis (11/17/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/17/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field ueb (11/17/04)
• Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/17/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Daniel Weston (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (11/17/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/17/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/17/04)
• Re: Mathematics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... ueb (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Lits O'Hate (11/17/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Len Gaasenbeek (11/17/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/17/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... greywolf42 (11/17/04)
• Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system greywolf42 (11/17/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/17/04)
• what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky-Bill Hobba K_Loupspeed (11/17/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Hammond Teh Moderator -> Re: Proposal- alt.sci.relativistic-god.moderated TMG (11/17/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Ken Seto (11/17/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/17/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/17/04)
• Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup Patrick Reany (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (11/17/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/17/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
• Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/17/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
• Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/17/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/17/04)
• Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED jem (11/17/04)
• Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
• Re: effect of high speed of electron on current amitmishra (11/17/04)
• Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
• Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/17/04)
• Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/17/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (11/17/04)
• Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Titan Point (11/17/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Max Keon (11/17/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/17/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/17/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Titan Point (11/17/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/17/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Titan Point (11/17/04)
• Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Titan Point (11/17/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/17/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/17/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? ZZBunker (11/17/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is The Ghost In The Machine (11/17/04)
• Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? The Ghost In The Machine (11/17/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/17/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/17/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/17/04)
• Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/17/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: effect of high speed of electron on current amitmishra (11/17/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno Jim Greenfield (11/17/04)
• Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bilge (11/17/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Y.Porat (11/17/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/17/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Y.Porat (11/17/04)
• Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/17/04)
• Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Bilge (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/17/04)
• RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Raheman Velji (11/17/04)
• How to build a time-machine ? ? ? Hans-Marc Olsen (11/17/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this shuba (11/17/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/17/04)
• Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
• Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
• Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
• Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/17/04)
• God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/17/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/17/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Marc Granby (11/17/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Androcles (11/17/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
• Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Uncle Al (11/17/04)
• Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Dennis McCarthy (11/17/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
• Re: MAN AS DUMB AS COAL - Ed Conrad [Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park dISC JoKeY (11/17/04)
• Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? WaiteDavid137 (11/17/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
• Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Marcus Wellpoth (11/17/04)
• Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/16/04)
• Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky Marcus Wellpoth (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Bilge (11/16/04)
• Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Marcus Wellpoth (11/16/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Marcus Wellpoth (11/16/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/16/04)
• Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/16/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/16/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
• Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/16/04)
• Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/16/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
• Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Chadwick Stone© (11/16/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Mathematics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... ueb (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality greywolf42 (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. greywolf42 (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/16/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/16/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/16/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
• Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. Daniel Weston (11/16/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Bilge (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/16/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup EjP (11/16/04)
• Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Tom Roberts (11/16/04)
• Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: How to built a universal clock Pmb (11/16/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (11/16/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (11/16/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (11/16/04)
• what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky K_Loupspeed (11/16/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (11/16/04)
• MAN AS DUMB AS COAL - Ed Conrad [Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Daedalus (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. Daniel Weston (11/16/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Dirk Van de moortel (11/16/04)
• Re: Is charge conserved between frames? Pmb (11/16/04)
• Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
• Re: What Is _MOTION_? The Ghost In The Machine (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Uncle Al (11/16/04)
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (11/16/04)
• Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (11/16/04)
• Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Uncle Al (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. Daniel Weston (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
• Re: Revised Hypothesis Harry (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Len Gaasenbeek (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. Titan Point (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Titan Point (11/16/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/16/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/16/04)
• Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Androcles (11/16/04)
• Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/16/04)
• Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/16/04)
• Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/16/04)
• Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/16/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Paul B. Andersen (11/16/04)
• Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Richard S. Westmoreland (11/16/04)
• Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Harry (11/16/04)
• Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality anon (11/16/04)
• Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/16/04)
• Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/16/04)
• Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/16/04)
• Re: On the observation of a moving object. Harry (11/16/04)
• Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Bilge (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
• Re: Conceptualization test. Bilge (11/16/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/16/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
• Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/16/04)
• Re: Bomb paradox Martin Hogbin (11/16/04)
• Re: Definition of A Field David Evens (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Y.Porat (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/16/04)
• Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
• Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (11/16/04)
• (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (11/16/04)
• Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (11/16/04)
• Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (11/16/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/16/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/16/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/16/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/16/04)
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno Jim Greenfield (11/16/04)
• Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/16/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
• Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
• Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
• Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
• Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help