sci.physics.relativity
By Thread
3799 messages sorted by: [ date ]
Starting: 10/31/04
Ending: 11/21/04
- slashdotted - sr laser clock shevek (11/21/04)
- Helical wave particles. Len Gaasenbeek (11/20/04)
- On the observation of a moving beam of light. kenneth couesbouc (11/20/04)
- Lorentz Force alternative (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
- can anything at all fall into a black hole? plex (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Eugene Shubert (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Theo Wollenleben (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? plex (11/21/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Theo Wollenleben (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? plex (11/21/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? MP (11/20/04)
- Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
- Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox eleaticus (11/20/04)
- Under Peer Review at JHEP-Journal of High Energy Physics K_Loupspeed (11/19/04)
- Google SCHOLAR! Uncle Al (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Evgenij Barsukov (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Maleki (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! MP (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Androcles (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! jahn (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Me (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Marcus Wellpoth (11/20/04)
- A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/19/04)
- Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
- Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Androcles (11/19/04)
- Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
- Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/18/04)
- Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Peter Duniho (11/18/04)
- Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Uncle Al (11/19/04)
- Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
- Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. partners_at_mistral.net (11/20/04)
- Re: Alchemy Uncle Al (11/18/04)
- Infinite series are aproximations? Emil (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? greywolf42 (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Satya Das (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Androcles (11/18/04)
- How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Tahcrq (11/18/04)
- New Web Site Dealing with Theoretical Physics(now is under construction) kiarash niknejad (11/18/04)
- For Sandra Smith about InfoRelation.com ada (11/18/04)
- www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS zetalimit (11/18/04)
- Granularity of SpaceTime? sanman (11/17/04)
- Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Lady Chatterly (11/17/04)
- Re: Geometrodynamics of inertial force in flat spacetime Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
- Calling Tom Potter Justin Lewis (11/17/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/17/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/17/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Bill Rowe (11/18/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/18/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Bill Rowe (11/19/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/18/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether stephen_at_nomail.com (11/18/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Androcles (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether jahn (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Eric Gisse (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/17/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/17/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether TomGee (11/20/04)
- Re: effect of high speed of electron on current amitmishra (11/17/04)
- RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Raheman Velji (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED jem (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Harry (11/18/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
- How to build a time-machine ? ? ? Hans-Marc Olsen (11/17/04)
- God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/17/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Titan Point (11/17/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Lits O'Hate (11/17/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Eric Gisse (11/17/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy bv_schornak (11/19/04)
- Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/16/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Marcus Wellpoth (11/17/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Uncle Al (11/17/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/17/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Y.Porat (11/17/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? ZZBunker (11/17/04)
- Re: Mathematics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... ueb (11/16/04)
- Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Marcus Wellpoth (11/16/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... jem (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Rowe (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Bill Rowe (11/20/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... stephen_at_nomail.com (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... stephen_at_nomail.com (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... stephen_at_nomail.com (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/20/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Daniel Weston (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... greywolf42 (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Obfuscated Ambiguities. Daniel Weston (11/19/04)
- Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. Daniel Weston (11/19/04)
- Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. Daniel Weston (11/19/04)
- Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
- Re: Obfuscated Ambiguities. jem (11/20/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... jem (11/20/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... xxein (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
- what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky K_Loupspeed (11/16/04)
- MAN AS DUMB AS COAL - Ed Conrad [Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Daedalus (11/16/04)
- Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Richard S. Westmoreland (11/16/04)
- Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
- Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/16/04)
- Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Titan Point (11/16/04)
- Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
- Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (11/16/04)
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (11/16/04)
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (11/16/04)
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (11/16/04)
- Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/15/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality jahn (11/15/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/17/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/17/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/17/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality anon (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Tom Roberts (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality greywolf42 (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality greywolf42 (11/17/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Beam (11/18/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Paul B. Andersen (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. Dirk Van de moortel (11/15/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. Bilge (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. Titan Point (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. Daniel Weston (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. Daniel Weston (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. Daniel Weston (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Ping Danny Boy! AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. greywolf42 (11/16/04)
- Let.s fight against InfoRelation - spamming service!!! inforelation55 (11/15/04)
- How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. joseph levy (11/15/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Titan Point (11/19/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
- A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/15/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/15/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/15/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/17/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/18/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/18/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/18/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/18/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/18/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/20/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/20/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Martin Hogbin (11/20/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/15/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/17/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/17/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/20/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Bilge (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Len Gaasenbeek (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Len Gaasenbeek (11/17/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/17/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c David Evens (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Max Keon (11/17/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/15/04)
- Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/15/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Patrick Reany (11/18/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/17/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/18/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/19/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry analog57_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
- Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. mike3 (11/15/04)
- Re: Retic Postings and SPAM Bilge (11/15/04)
- Defining Terms Margaret Kelso (11/15/04)
- Zeno Margaret Kelso (11/15/04)
- Re: The *REAL* story of co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
- Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
- Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
- Newton's Principia: Definitions: I - IV Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
- Bomb paradox mtm (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/15/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/15/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox Martin Hogbin (11/16/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox Benno Muilwyk (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox Martin Hogbin (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox Benno Muilwyk (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
- Corrected Lecture 1 on Metric Engineering Stargates and Warp Drive Jack Sarfatti (11/14/04)
- Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/13/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. jahn (11/13/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/14/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. jahn (11/14/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/15/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/15/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Dirk Van de moortel (11/15/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/15/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/18/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Androcles (11/15/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. jahn (11/14/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/14/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/14/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Bilge (11/15/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. jahn (11/13/04)
- Sarfatti Lectures on Metric Engineering of Warp, Wormhole & WMD (W^3) Jack Sarfatti (11/13/04)
- Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy xxein (11/13/04)
- Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/13/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Daniel Weston (11/13/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/14/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/15/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/16/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup Patrick Reany (11/17/04)
- Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. Patrick Reany (11/18/04)
- Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/18/04)
- Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. Patrick Reany (11/19/04)
- Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Biggest misconceptions on this newsgroup answered. AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation - first paradox eelgro (11/15/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
- treply eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/14/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/18/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/18/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Infinity or finity?? Paul Cardinale (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Rotidewq (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/14/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/16/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/16/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/15/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Jim Greenfield (11/16/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/16/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Jim Greenfield (11/17/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/20/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno The Ghost In The Machine (11/21/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/15/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno KlingvilleBill (11/14/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Eric Gisse (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/13/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
- Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Jason W. Hinson (11/12/04)
- Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/11/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/12/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/16/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/17/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/17/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/17/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/18/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/18/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/18/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/18/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/18/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/19/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/19/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/19/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/19/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time suzysewnshow (11/13/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/13/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/13/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/13/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/14/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/14/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/15/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/15/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/15/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/15/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/15/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/15/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/16/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Ja Lar (11/11/04)
- Einstein: Release of Volume 9, The Berlin Years Ron (11/10/04)
- On the use of definitions in discussing physics AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Non Abelian Universe? Russell E. Rierson (11/10/04)
- Non Abelian Universe? Russell E. Rierson (11/10/04)
- Gravitational Time Sam. Mitchell (11/10/04)
- Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Mitchell (11/10/04)
- Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
- Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Crown-Horned Snorkack (11/10/04)
- Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/12/04)
- Einstein Revolutionary Theater Lazy Dog Society Jack Sarfatti (11/10/04)
- Question about change-of-basis bars Paul (11/09/04)
- Re: Universe = Mind Thalassa (11/09/04)
- Re Einstein (1905) Absurdities Adrian Mark Armstrong (11/09/04)
- Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: Big Bang Question nightbat (11/09/04)
- Re: Question about God=G_uv Athina Georgiadou (11/09/04)
- New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation YBM (11/09/04)
- Re: New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
- Re: New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
- Re: New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation Harry (11/11/04)
- Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
- Meaning of "weight" in general relativity Jack Sarfatti (11/08/04)
- Why is the speed of light as it is Alex C.P (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Igor (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Dirk Van de moortel (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Dirk Van de moortel (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is greywolf42 (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Ron ++++++ (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is FrediFizzx (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is John C. Polasek (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/13/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/14/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/15/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/15/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/16/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is The Ghost In The Machine (11/17/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/16/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Ken Seto (11/17/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/18/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Titan Point (11/19/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/19/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/13/04)
- Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Tom Roberts (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Tom Roberts (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Patrick Reany (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Titan Point (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> The Ghost In The Machine (11/09/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Dirk Van de moortel (11/09/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/09/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> The Ghost In The Machine (11/10/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Tom Roberts (11/10/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/10/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Dirk Van de moortel (11/10/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Tom Roberts (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> David Park (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> xxein (11/09/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> shevek (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> tfleming1_at_hotkey.net.au (11/09/04)
- WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Moderate Mammal (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Moderate Mammal (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Moderate Mammal (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Packrat® (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bunn E. Rabbit (11/09/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/09/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 K. A. Cannon (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 SueNet (11/09/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Aratzio (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ross (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 K. A. Cannon (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone© (11/09/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 SueNet (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Meat Plow (11/09/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/10/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/10/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Meat Plow (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/12/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/15/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/15/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/16/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/16/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone© (11/12/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ray Bonny (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bookman (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Justice-for-all (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE The Observer (11/13/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Tony (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Vampi Fangs (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Lady Chatterly (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Tony (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Vampi Fangs (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Peter J Ross (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Cujo DeSockpuppet (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone© (11/09/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chuck Lysaght (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Ross (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Dr. Flonkenstein (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 TMG (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Barbara's Cat (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 =The Commentator = (11/12/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Dr. Flonkenstein (11/12/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/12/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Dr. Flonkenstein (11/12/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Art Deco (11/13/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Dr. Flonkenstein (11/13/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Art Deco (11/13/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Dr. Flonkenstein (11/14/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/12/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/15/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Moderate Mammal (11/08/04)
- Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Mitchell (11/08/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? J Jensen (11/08/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/08/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/09/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/10/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Anthony Cerrato (11/11/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/12/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Edward Green (11/13/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/13/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/14/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Edward Green (11/17/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/19/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/12/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/14/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/09/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Edward Green (11/09/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/15/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Edward Green (11/15/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/08/04)
- SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/08/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Randy Poe (11/08/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/09/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/09/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Paul Cardinale (11/09/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/11/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Paul Cardinale (11/12/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/12/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/12/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Jem (11/12/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/12/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/13/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/13/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/14/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/14/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/14/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/14/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/15/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/15/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/16/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/16/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/16/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/17/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/17/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/18/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Paul Cardinale (11/12/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/13/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/12/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/12/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/13/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/13/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/13/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/17/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/17/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/19/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/18/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/11/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/13/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/14/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this shuba (11/14/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/16/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this shuba (11/17/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/17/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this shuba (11/17/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/20/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this shuba (11/20/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/09/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/09/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this xxein (11/19/04)
- Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/07/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/07/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/08/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/08/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/09/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/09/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/10/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/10/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bilge (11/07/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action ZZBunker (11/08/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/07/04)
- Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Harry (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field xxein (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Dirk Van de moortel (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ZZBunker (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ueb (11/17/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ueb (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Dirk Van de moortel (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Dirk Van de moortel (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Dirk Van de moortel (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Daniel Weston (11/17/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/17/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Peter Kinane (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Peter Kinane (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Peter Kinane (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/18/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bob Cain (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field John C. Polasek (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Buck Mulligan (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Randy Poe (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Gregory L. Hansen (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/18/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/19/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field David Evens (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field David Evens (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Justin Lewis (11/18/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field hanson (11/18/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field David Evens (11/18/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field hanson (11/18/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/21/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/21/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Tom Potter (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/14/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/11/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/12/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Ken Seto (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/15/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/16/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field John Chelen (11/10/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
- Re: Twins paradox, redux Dirk Van de moortel (11/07/04)
- The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help RP (11/08/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help RP (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Gregory L. Hansen (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help David Thomson (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Tom Roberts (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Patrick Reany (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help David Thomson (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help robert j. kolker (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help George Jones (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help George Jones (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Androcles (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Androcles (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eric Gisse (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eric Gisse (11/11/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/15/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Uncle Al (11/08/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Gene Ward Smith (11/08/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Will Twentyman (11/08/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/11/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/11/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Anon (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/11/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help N. Silver (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help N. Silver (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help N. Silver (11/16/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/15/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/16/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help stephen_at_nomail.com (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help stephen_at_nomail.com (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Chairman of the David Hilbert Appreciation Society (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/15/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/07/04)
- Special for The Ghost in the Machine eleaticus (11/06/04)
- Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/06/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/06/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/07/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/07/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/08/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/09/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/07/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/09/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/09/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation xxein (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Vern (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/18/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/18/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Paul Stowe (11/16/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation V ertner Vergon (11/08/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation V ertner Vergon (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation V ertner Vergon (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/14/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation V ertner Vergon (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Dirk Van de moortel (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation V ertner Vergon (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation V ertner Vergon (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation jahn (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation jahn (11/11/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Dirk Van de moortel (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation V ertner Vergon (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/12/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation V ertner Vergon (11/13/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/07/04)
- Re: A New Definition for "TIME" kenseto (11/06/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mass robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
- Do Virtual Photons Exist? T Einsteinhoax (11/06/04)
- Re: Drag Free Control jahn (11/06/04)
- Almost Everything is Expanding Ray Tomes (11/05/04)
- Aliens at CERN????-Centre Europeene por la Recherche Nucleaire K_Loupspeed (11/05/04)
- On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/05/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/05/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/06/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/06/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/09/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. Harry (11/11/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. stephen_at_nomail.com (11/11/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/13/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. Harry (11/14/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. Len Gaasenbeek (11/13/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/15/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. Harry (11/16/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/16/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. Harry (11/18/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/16/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/16/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. Harry (11/18/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/20/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. stephen_at_nomail.com (11/20/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/20/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/20/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/06/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/05/04)
- Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/05/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Dirk Van de moortel (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Dirk Van de moortel (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/07/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/07/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/07/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/07/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/07/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/07/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/07/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/08/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/08/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/09/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/09/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/07/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/05/04)
- Corpuscular Photons jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons Dirk Van de moortel (11/06/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons Dirk Van de moortel (11/06/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Paradise 873 : a spreading meme John Vreeland (11/05/04)
- A Unified Field Theory Bill Clark (11/04/04)
- USAF Report on Warp, Wormhole and WMD Jack Sarfatti (11/04/04)
- speed addition depend on the clock synchro beda pietanza (11/04/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro beda pietanza (11/06/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro beda pietanza (11/07/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro beda pietanza (11/12/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro beda pietanza (11/15/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro beda pietanza (11/06/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
- Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Eugene Shubert (11/04/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Mike (11/04/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Tom Roberts (11/04/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Mike (11/05/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Gregory L. Hansen (11/05/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Eric Gisse (11/05/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Bill Hobba (11/05/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Marcus Wellpoth (11/06/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Tom Roberts (11/06/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Mike (11/05/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia bernard.chaverondier (11/06/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Tom Roberts (11/04/04)
- Double-think, Len Gaasenbeek (11/04/04)
- Einstein's Thoughts on America (1921) Brandon (11/04/04)
- Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/04/04)
- Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Mitchell (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Silas (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator shevek (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Paul Cardinale (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Uncle Al (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Bruce Pew (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Harry Conover (11/04/04)
- Star Gate Teleportation Zero Point Energy Field Equations Jack Sarfatti (11/04/04)
- Re: Photons Under Control tfleming1_at_hotkey.net.au (11/03/04)
- Landau & Lifshitz on Gravity Jack Sarfatti (11/03/04)
- about EPR and the way information travels Thierry (11/03/04)
- why no private company designs ?? . . . (UFO, Zero Point Energy, ETC...) Transition Zone (11/03/04)
- Re: why no private company designs ?? . . . (UFO, Zero Point Energy, ETC...) Ellen Simonetti (11/03/04)
- Re: why no private company designs ?? . . . (UFO, Zero Point Energy, ETC...) Malcolm (11/06/04)
- Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Dirk Van de moortel (11/03/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Mike (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Dirk Van de moortel (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Dirk Van de moortel (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/05/04)
- What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/05/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/05/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/05/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/05/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/05/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Oriel36 (11/06/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/06/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/07/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (11/07/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/08/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/06/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Oriel36 (11/07/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Oriel36 (11/07/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Patrick Reany (11/08/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Oriel36 (11/09/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Bilge (11/13/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Oriel36 (11/14/04)
- On the Complexity of MOTION Daniel Weston (11/09/04)
- Re: On the Complexity of MOTION AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: On the Complexity of MOTION Paul Cardinale (11/09/04)
- Re: On the Complexity of MOTION ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/12/04)
- Re: On the Complexity of MOTION Daniel Weston (11/12/04)
- Re: On the Complexity of MOTION ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
- Re: On the Complexity of MOTION Daniel Weston (11/13/04)
- Re: On the Complexity of MOTION AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: On the Complexity of MOTION xxein (11/10/04)
- Re: On the Complexity of MOTION Rob (11/10/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/05/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/06/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Where's Weston? AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Where's Weston? Daniel Weston (11/09/04)
- Re: Where's Weston? AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Where's Weston? Titan Point (11/11/04)
- Re: Where's Weston? AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Ignorance breeds misconceptions Patrick Reany (11/10/04)
- Re: Ignorance breeds misconceptions Dirk Van de moortel (11/10/04)
- Re: Ignorance breeds misconceptions AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Ignorance breeds misconceptions Titan Point (11/11/04)
- Re: Ignorance breeds misconceptions AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Patrick Reany (11/08/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Patrick Reany (11/09/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Patrick Reany (11/10/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Patrick Reany (11/10/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/10/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Patrick Reany (11/11/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/11/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Patrick Reany (11/15/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? jahn (11/11/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/12/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? jahn (11/12/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? jahn (11/15/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/15/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/15/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? Daniel Weston (11/15/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? The Ghost In The Machine (11/16/04)
- Re: What Is _MOTION_? AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/05/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/12/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Mike (11/10/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Daniel Weston (11/10/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/12/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Paul Stowe (11/13/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Paul Stowe (11/13/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bilge (11/13/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/19/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/19/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/05/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/05/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/08/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/09/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/09/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Daniel Weston (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/12/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/12/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/13/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/16/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Harry (11/13/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/05/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/05/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: BIG BANG NOISE---Listen Above The Noise nightbat (11/03/04)
- Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/02/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? stephen_at_nomail.com (11/02/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Harry (11/03/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/04/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Harry (11/04/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/05/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Harry (11/09/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/15/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Harry (11/16/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/04/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Bilge (11/04/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/04/04)
- Alleged USAF/DIA UFO Metric Engineering Meeting in DC Jack Sarfatti (11/02/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/02/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/11/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/14/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/14/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/20/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/21/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/12/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/15/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/15/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/15/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/15/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/16/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Titan Point (11/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (11/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (11/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/18/04)
- final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Titan Point (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Titan Point (11/20/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Aleksandr Timofeev (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
- SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Androcles (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. ZZBunker (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Eric Gisse (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. J.E. (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Androcles (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Mike (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Patrick Reany (11/19/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Dirk Van de moortel (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Androcles (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. robert j. kolker (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Androcles (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. eleaticus (11/20/04)
- Re: SR consistency is crap. Sam Wormley (11/20/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Gregory L. Hansen (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. eleaticus (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Creighton Hogg (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Androcles (11/19/04)
- Re: final proof Einstein 1905 is crap. Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/15/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Peter Kupfer (11/11/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/03/04)
- JE and MMX eleaticus (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/04/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/05/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/07/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/07/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/08/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/09/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/09/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/10/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/10/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/10/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/10/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/11/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/11/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/12/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/13/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/08/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/09/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/10/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Dirk Van de moortel (11/10/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/04/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/02/04)
- Yikes, utterly hairy math! Ben Bean (11/02/04)
- Yikes, utterly hairy math! Ben Bean (11/02/04)
- Re: Yikes, utterly hairy math! Tom Roberts (11/03/04)
- Re: Yikes, utterly hairy math! Paul B. Andersen (11/04/04)
- Re: Ken, need help with this Pmb (11/02/04)
- "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Lanifq (11/02/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Eugene Shubert (11/02/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Ken Seto (11/05/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" The Ghost In The Machine (11/06/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/06/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/06/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Eric Gisse (11/07/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" The Ghost In The Machine (11/07/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" The Ghost In The Machine (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" The Ghost In The Machine (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" The Ghost In The Machine (11/06/04)
- Communicating at Translight Velocities Lanifq (11/02/04)
- Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Bilge (11/02/04)
- Profanes' education Pentcho Valev (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Dirk Van de moortel (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Tom Roberts (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Harry (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Tom Roberts (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Harry (11/03/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Pentcho Valev (11/03/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Dirk Van de moortel (11/03/04)
- Re: Profanes' education AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Oriel36 (11/04/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Dirk Van de moortel (11/04/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Oriel36 (11/06/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Dirk Van de moortel (11/06/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Oriel36 (11/07/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/01/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/02/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/03/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/03/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/04/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/04/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 V ertner Vergon (11/04/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/05/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/08/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/09/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/09/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/12/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/12/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/13/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/13/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/15/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/15/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 stephen_at_nomail.com (11/15/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/16/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/03/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/02/04)
- Re: Quantum cosmology MP (11/01/04)
- Re: johnreed take V.I johnlawrencereed (11/01/04)
- Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (Was SR) Nicolaas Vroom (11/01/04)
- Metric Engineering Star Gates Jack Sarfatti (11/01/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/01/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/01/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/02/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/05/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Androcles (11/05/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Eric Baird (11/07/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/02/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Ilja Schmelzer (11/03/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Ilja Schmelzer (11/04/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Ilja Schmelzer (11/09/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Ilja Schmelzer (11/03/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/03/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/03/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Eric Baird (11/07/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Eric Baird (11/07/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/01/04)
- Michelson's Interference Experiment - H.A.Lorentz Androcles (11/01/04)
- Re: A definition of time. stephen_at_nomail.com (11/01/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (11/02/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: A definition of time. jahn (11/02/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Androcles (11/03/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: A definition of time. N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/02/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (11/02/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (11/01/04)
- What's missing? AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? Dirk Van de moortel (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? The Ghost In The Machine (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? Paul B. Andersen (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: What's missing? jem (11/04/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: What's missing? Dirk Van de moortel (11/02/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bilge (11/04/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bilge (11/05/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bilge (11/11/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/11/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bilge (11/12/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/12/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/12/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bilge (11/13/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (11/01/04)
- Re: Define a clock AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 caryrjr (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 CND (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone© (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Fuming Gator (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Spike \ (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Fyre (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Lady Chatterly (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Manchurian Candidate (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Lady Chatterly (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Art Deco (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Dr. Flonkenstein (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: Please select your *partner* for auk's latest up-the-bum-chin-rub *daisy-chain* Free Speech (11/03/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Art Deco (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 TMG (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Charles Newton (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Dr. Artemis \ (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Roofshadow (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 bluemoon (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 =The Commentator = (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Larry Huntley (11/08/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bookman (11/08/04)
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (11/01/04)
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (11/01/04)
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (11/01/04)
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (11/01/04)
- Entropy of Universe Jack Sarfatti (11/01/04)
- Twin Paradox in non-trivial spatial topologies Tom Roberts (11/01/04)
- On Light bending Bilal Sallakh (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Randy M. Dumse (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Harry (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Randy M. Dumse (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Harry (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending John C. Polasek (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Harry (11/02/04)
- Re: On Light bending John C. Polasek (11/02/04)
- Re: On Light bending Harry (11/03/04)
- Re: On Light bending John C. Polasek (11/03/04)
- Re: On Light bending Harry (11/03/04)
- Re: On Light bending Bilal Sallakh (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Harry (11/01/04)
- Re: Religious terminology question George Hammond (11/01/04)
- Anti+truths: Splitting The Truth ! caesarjbsquitti (11/01/04)
- Re: The physics of Truth ! ? caesarjbsquitti (11/01/04)
- Re: 25,000 Euros to explain Relativity in less than 5 minutes George Hammond (11/01/04)
- Re: Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: SR, curvature terms, and Realms of Validity Bilge (10/31/04)
- 299,792,458 ? Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Bill Hobba (10/31/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal vonroach (11/01/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Tom Roberts (11/01/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Luigi Caselli (11/01/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/01/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal vonroach (11/02/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal vonroach (11/01/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Tom Roberts (11/01/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal vonroach (11/02/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal vonroach (11/02/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal vonroach (11/03/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal vonroach (11/04/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Tom Roberts (11/01/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal vonroach (11/01/04)
- Re: How can I become an expert anti-relativist? Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (10/31/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system greywolf42 (11/01/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system greywolf42 (11/02/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/04/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/05/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system greywolf42 (11/09/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system greywolf42 (11/10/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Paul Stowe (11/10/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/10/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/12/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/14/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system stephen_at_nomail.com (11/05/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/07/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/03/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/06/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bilge (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Patrick Reany (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/11/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Patrick Reany (11/12/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system greywolf42 (11/12/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/16/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system greywolf42 (11/17/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/09/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system jahn (11/10/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Androcles (11/10/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/11/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Paul B. Andersen (11/14/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/13/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bilge (11/14/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/16/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bilge (11/17/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/09/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Androcles (11/09/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system greywolf42 (11/01/04)
- Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month (was: Re: Hammond Teh Moderator) Jim Black (10/31/04)
- Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month TMG (11/01/04)
- Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month stew dean (11/01/04)
- Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation George Hammond (10/31/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/31/04)
- Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Patrick Reany (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Paul Stowe (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? robert j. kolker (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? robert j. kolker (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? YBM (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? robert j. kolker (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? robert j. kolker (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? YBM (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Wouter (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Randy M. Dumse (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bill Hobba (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? shuba (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? shuba (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? shevek (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? robert j. kolker (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eric Gisse (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eric Gisse (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? YBM (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eric Gisse (11/03/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/03/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? YBM (11/03/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eric Gisse (11/04/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/04/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Daniel Weston (11/04/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/04/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Patrick Reany (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Patrick Reany (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? ueb (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? ueb (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bilge (11/07/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? ueb (11/07/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Precisely (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? shuba (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Precisely (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Jon Hurwitz (11/02/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (10/31/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/02/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/02/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/04/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/05/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/05/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Sergey Karavashkin (11/09/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Y.Porat (11/10/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/10/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Y.Porat (11/13/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/13/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Y.Porat (11/14/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Y.Porat (11/16/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/16/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Y.Porat (11/17/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Y.Porat (11/18/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/18/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/10/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/11/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/12/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/12/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/12/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Lewis Mammel (11/05/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/05/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/06/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/09/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI peter (11/13/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI peter (11/14/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/17/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/18/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/19/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/19/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/09/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/09/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/10/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Bill Hobba (11/12/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/13/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/14/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/02/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/06/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/06/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/07/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/07/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/07/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? stephen_at_nomail.com (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/01/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/01/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? suzysewnshow (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? suzysewnshow (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? suzysewnshow (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? V ertner Vergon (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? V ertner Vergon (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? jahn (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? V ertner Vergon (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? V ertner Vergon (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? V ertner Vergon (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/20/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/20/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Eugene Stefanovich (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Eugene Stefanovich (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Eugene Stefanovich (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Eugene Stefanovich (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/17/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? V ertner Vergon (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (11/13/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (11/14/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Henri Wilson (11/15/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/20/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/20/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (11/20/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? V ertner Vergon (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/07/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Len Gaasenbeek (10/31/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Y.Porat (10/31/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock shevek (10/31/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock RP (11/01/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (11/01/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (11/01/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (11/01/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Henri Wilson (11/05/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Pmb (11/08/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/09/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Pmb (11/10/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/10/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Pmb (11/16/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/17/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock RP (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock RP (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock David Evens (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock David Evens (11/07/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/07/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/07/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/07/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (11/07/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/07/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock David Evens (11/08/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/08/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock David Evens (11/11/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock jahn (11/11/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock David Evens (11/13/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock David Evens (11/07/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (11/05/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
- Re: OK, I'm Ready For the Patronizing Insults From the Resident Gurus! Paul B. Andersen (10/31/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/31/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/31/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/01/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (11/01/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (11/01/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/01/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/02/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/02/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (11/02/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/03/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/01/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/02/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/02/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/03/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/03/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/04/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/04/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/04/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Gregory L. Hansen (11/05/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/05/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/05/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/06/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/06/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/07/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/08/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/14/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/10/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/14/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/14/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Henri Wilson (11/14/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (11/15/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/17/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/17/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/17/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/18/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/17/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/19/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (11/20/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/20/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Henri Wilson (11/20/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/06/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/10/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/17/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/01/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/01/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (10/31/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (11/01/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/03/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/05/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/09/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Eric Gisse (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Eric Gisse (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Eric Gisse (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME ? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/11/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/12/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (11/01/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? TomGee (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/31/04)
- *Minkowski * metric & ISU (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/31/04)
- black holes and singularity alistair (10/31/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (10/31/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (10/31/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/01/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity alistair (11/02/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/02/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/02/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/02/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/02/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/03/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/03/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/03/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/03/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/03/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/04/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/04/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/04/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Creighton Hogg (11/03/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/04/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/05/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/07/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/08/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/09/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Creighton Hogg (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Creighton Hogg (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/12/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/12/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/14/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/14/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (11/14/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/03/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/04/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/05/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/07/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (11/04/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/04/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (11/04/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/05/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/05/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (11/08/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/08/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Hawkings latest Randy M. Dumse (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Hawkings latest MP (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Hawkings latest Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Horizon Geons Randy M. Dumse (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Horizon Geons MP (11/14/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Horizon Geons MP (11/15/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Horizon Geons Dreamer (11/19/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Horizon Geons shuba (11/20/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ilja Schmelzer (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ilja Schmelzer (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (10/31/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Eric Gisse (11/01/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Eric Gisse (11/05/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/05/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/07/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/07/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/09/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/09/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Creighton Hogg (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Creighton Hogg (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity xxein (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/12/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/12/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/14/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/15/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/15/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Creighton Hogg (11/17/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Creighton Hogg (11/18/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/19/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Bilge (11/20/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/12/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ilja Schmelzer (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/10/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/11/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/12/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/12/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/12/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/14/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/12/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (11/13/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/08/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/06/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (10/31/04)
- The universality of free fall conspiracy Mike (10/31/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Dirk Van de moortel (10/31/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Sam Wormley (10/31/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Uncle Al (10/31/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Eric Gisse (10/31/04)
- Re: OK Eric Gisse (10/31/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (10/31/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/01/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/02/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/03/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/05/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/07/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/07/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/08/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/09/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/09/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/10/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/11/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/11/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/12/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/12/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/12/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/12/04)
- Re: OK Eric Gisse (11/09/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/10/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/10/04)
- Re: OK Eric Gisse (11/10/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/11/04)
- Re: OK Eric Gisse (11/12/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/12/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/12/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/12/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (11/12/04)
- Re: OK The Ghost In The Machine (11/12/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/01/04)
- Re: OK The Ghost In The Machine (10/31/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/01/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (10/31/04)
- Re: zero and infinity Revisited Eric Gisse (10/31/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (10/31/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/01/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/01/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (11/05/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR The Ghost In The Machine (11/06/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (11/06/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (11/07/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/08/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/08/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (11/09/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/09/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/08/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/08/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (11/05/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/03/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/04/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/04/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (11/05/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/08/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/04/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/08/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/09/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/10/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/10/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/10/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/11/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Billy Bob (11/11/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/11/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/11/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/12/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/12/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/13/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/14/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/14/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/15/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/15/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/15/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/15/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/16/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/17/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/17/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/18/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/18/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/18/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/18/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/18/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/18/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (11/19/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/20/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/17/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Eric Gisse (11/11/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Henri Wilson (11/11/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/04/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/03/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. YBM (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Eric Gisse (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Marcus Wellpoth (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Marcus Wellpoth (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Eric Gisse (11/01/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Marcus Wellpoth (11/01/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Marcus Wellpoth (11/16/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Marcus Wellpoth (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. John Kennaugh (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Eric Gisse (10/31/04)
- Re: Abandon hope all ye who enter here Ken S. Tucker (10/31/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/03/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION TomGee (11/03/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/03/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION TomGee (11/04/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/04/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION TomGee (11/05/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/05/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION Androcles (11/05/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION TomGee (11/05/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/05/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/05/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION TomGee (11/06/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/03/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/03/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/31/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/31/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark YBM (10/31/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/03/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark David Evens (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/06/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (11/06/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark RP (11/06/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark David Evens (11/06/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark YBM (11/05/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark David Evens (11/06/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/06/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark David Evens (11/07/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark David Evens (11/08/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark David Evens (11/08/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (11/08/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark David Evens (11/11/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark nightbat (11/07/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/31/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/31/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/01/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/02/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/03/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/03/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/04/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/04/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/05/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/05/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/05/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/06/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/10/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/12/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/12/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/13/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/15/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/16/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/18/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/18/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/19/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/04/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/04/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/05/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/05/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/06/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/08/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/08/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/09/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/10/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/10/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/10/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/11/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/11/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/12/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/12/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/13/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/15/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/12/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/13/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/13/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/15/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/15/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/15/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/16/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/18/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/18/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/19/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/18/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/19/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/20/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Ken S. Tucker (11/21/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/05/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/06/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/06/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. bernard.chaverondier (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. bernard.chaverondier (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. bernard.chaverondier (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/07/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. bernard.chaverondier (11/08/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/01/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Larry Burford (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Gerald Lasser (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity greywolf42 (11/01/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity greywolf42 (11/02/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity greywolf42 (11/03/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Tom Van Flandern (11/04/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Larry Burford (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Larry Burford (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Dennis McCarthy (11/17/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Larry Burford (10/31/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/31/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/31/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (11/04/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (11/05/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/05/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (11/06/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (11/09/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/31/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (11/01/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (11/02/04)
- Physics as Metaphor Patrick Reany (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor Daniel Weston (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor stephen_at_nomail.com (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor Dirk Van de moortel (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor Dirk Van de moortel (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor jem (11/04/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/05/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/05/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor jem (11/05/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/05/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor Bill Hobba (11/05/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor jem (11/08/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor AllYou! (11/09/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor greywolf42 (11/03/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor Patrick Reany (11/05/04)
- Re: Physics as Metaphor greywolf42 (11/07/04)
- 'Newton never had point particles' -- greywolf42 Patrick Reany (11/08/04)
- Re: 'Newton never had point particles' -- greywolf42 greywolf42 (11/08/04)
- Re: 'Newton never had point particles' -- greywolf42 Patrick Reany (11/09/04)
- Re: 'Newton never had point particles' -- greywolf42 Vern (11/10/04)
- Re: 'Newton never had point particles' -- greywolf42 greywolf42 (11/11/04)
- Re: 'Newton never had point particles' -- greywolf42 greywolf42 (11/10/04)
- Re: 'Newton never had point particles' -- greywolf42 xxein (11/11/04)
- Re: 'Newton never had point particles' -- greywolf42 greywolf42 (11/12/04)
- Re: 'Newton never had point particles' -- greywolf42 xxein (11/14/04)
- What is the intended output of the scientific method? Patrick Reany (11/11/04)
- Re: What is the intended output of the scientific method? greywolf42 (11/12/04)
- Re: What is the intended output of the scientific method? Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
- Re: What is the intended output of the scientific method? greywolf42 (11/13/04)
- Re: What is the intended output of the scientific method? Oriel36 (11/13/04)
- Re: What is the intended output of the scientific method? robert j. kolker (11/13/04)
- Re: What is the intended output of the scientific method? greywolf42 (11/13/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (11/04/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (11/04/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (11/01/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. shevek (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Androcles (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Daniel Weston (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Androcles (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/03/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. shevek (11/02/04)