sci.physics.relativity
By Thread

3799 messages sorted by: [ date ]

Starting: 10/31/04
Ending: 11/21/04

slashdotted - sr laser clock shevek (11/21/04)
- Re: slashdotted - sr laser clock N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/21/04)
Helical wave particles. Len Gaasenbeek (11/20/04)
- Re: Helical wave particles. Androcles (11/20/04)
  - Re: Helical wave particles. Marcus Wellpoth (11/20/04)
    - Re: Helical wave particles. Androcles (11/21/04)
    - Re: Helical wave particles. Marcus Wellpoth (11/21/04)
On the observation of a moving beam of light. kenneth couesbouc (11/20/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving beam of light. Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
Lorentz Force alternative (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/20/04)
- Re: Lorentz Force alternative (kst) jahn (11/20/04)
can anything at all fall into a black hole? plex (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Bill Hobba (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
  - Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? The Ghost In The Machine (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Eugene Shubert (11/20/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? Theo Wollenleben (11/20/04)
  - Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? plex (11/21/04)
- Re: can anything at all fall into a black hole? MP (11/20/04)
Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox eleaticus (11/20/04)
- Re: Schwartz'n'eleaticus Paradox Uncle Al (11/20/04)
  - Uncle assAl: Troll House Kookie eleaticus (11/20/04)
Under Peer Review at JHEP-Journal of High Energy Physics K_Loupspeed (11/19/04)
Google SCHOLAR! Uncle Al (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! robert j. kolker (11/19/04)
  - Re: Google SCHOLAR! Boris Mohar (11/20/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Sam Wormley (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Evgenij Barsukov (11/19/04)
  - Re: Google SCHOLAR! John C. Polasek (11/20/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Maleki (11/19/04)
  - Re: Google SCHOLAR! Maleki (11/20/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! MP (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Androcles (11/19/04)
  - Re: Google SCHOLAR! Dirk Van de moortel (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! jahn (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Me (11/19/04)
- Re: Google SCHOLAR! Marcus Wellpoth (11/20/04)
A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
- Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/19/04)
  - Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
    - Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/20/04)
- Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Eric Gisse (11/19/04)
- Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Androcles (11/19/04)
  - Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
    - Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Androcles (11/19/04)
    - Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/20/04)
  - Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Titan Point (11/20/04)
- Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
  - Re: A Case for Paul Andersen's Famous Tick Fairies. Henri Wilson (11/19/04)
Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/18/04)
- Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Peter Duniho (11/18/04)
  - Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
  - Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Jeet (11/19/04)
- Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. Uncle Al (11/19/04)
- Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
- Re: Solution To Newton's Third Law of Motion. partners_at_mistral.net (11/20/04)
Re: Alchemy Uncle Al (11/18/04)
- Re: Alchemy Androcles (11/18/04)
Infinite series are aproximations? Emil (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Tom Roberts (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? greywolf42 (11/18/04)
  - Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Satya Das (11/18/04)
- Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Androcles (11/18/04)
  - Re: Infinite series are aproximations? Dirk Van de moortel (11/18/04)
How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Tahcrq (11/18/04)
New Web Site Dealing with Theoretical Physics(now is under construction) kiarash niknejad (11/18/04)
For Sandra Smith about InfoRelation.com ada (11/18/04)
www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS zetalimit (11/18/04)
- Re: www.beyond-science.com lets see how high your I.Q is ALIENS Paul Cardinale (11/18/04)
Granularity of SpaceTime? sanman (11/17/04)
Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Lady Chatterly (11/17/04)
- Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Lady Chatterly (11/17/04)
Re: Geometrodynamics of inertial force in flat spacetime Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
Calling Tom Potter Justin Lewis (11/17/04)
Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/17/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
  - Re: evidence for the existence of the ether AllYou! (11/17/04)
    - Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Titan Point (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
  - Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/17/04)
  - Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Thomas Clarke (11/17/04)
  - Re: evidence for the existence of the ether greywolf42 (11/17/04)
  - Re: evidence for the existence of the ether Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
- Re: evidence for the existence of the ether TomGee (11/20/04)
Re: effect of high speed of electron on current amitmishra (11/17/04)
- Re: effect of high speed of electron on current amitmishra (11/17/04)
- Re: effect of high speed of electron on current Paul Cardinale (11/18/04)
- Re: effect of high speed of electron on current Bilge (11/18/04)
RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Raheman Velji (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Dirk Van de moortel (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Paul B. Andersen (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED jem (11/17/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Harry (11/18/04)
  - Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED robert j. kolker (11/18/04)
    - Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Harry (11/19/04)
  - Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Androcles (11/18/04)
    - Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED Titan Point (11/19/04)
- Re: RELATIVITY DEBUNKED ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
How to build a time-machine ? ? ? Hans-Marc Olsen (11/17/04)
- Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/17/04)
  - Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? The Ghost In The Machine (11/17/04)
- Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
- Re: How to build a time-machine ? ? ? Eric Gisse (11/18/04)
God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/17/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Titan Point (11/17/04)
  - Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/17/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Lits O'Hate (11/17/04)
  - Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/18/04)
    - Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/18/04)
    - Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Lits O'Hate (11/18/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy Eric Gisse (11/17/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
- Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy bv_schornak (11/19/04)
  - Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy George Hammond (11/20/04)
    - Re: God=G_uv An Historical Colloquy bv_schornak (11/20/04)
Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/16/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Marcus Wellpoth (11/17/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Uncle Al (11/17/04)
  - Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Androcles (11/17/04)
    - Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Sam Wormley (11/17/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? TomGee (11/17/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Y.Porat (11/17/04)
  - Re: Time is a Property of Matter? Mitchell (11/18/04)
- Re: Time is a Property of Matter? ZZBunker (11/17/04)
Re: Mathematics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... ueb (11/16/04)
- Re: Mathematics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... ueb (11/17/04)
Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Marcus Wellpoth (11/16/04)
  - Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
  - Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
    - Re: Have you ever wondered..... ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/20/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (11/17/04)
  - Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
  - Re: Have you ever wondered..... greywolf42 (11/17/04)
  - Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/17/04)
- Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (11/18/04)
what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky K_Loupspeed (11/16/04)
- Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
  - Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky Marcus Wellpoth (11/16/04)
    - Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky Bill Hobba (11/17/04)
  - Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
- what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky-Bill Hobba K_Loupspeed (11/17/04)
  - Re: what are friends for???Today I am Feeling Lucky-Bill Hobba Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
MAN AS DUMB AS COAL - Ed Conrad [Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Daedalus (11/16/04)
- Re: MAN AS DUMB AS COAL - Ed Conrad [Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park dISC JoKeY (11/17/04)
Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Richard S. Westmoreland (11/16/04)
- Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Androcles (11/16/04)
- Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Chadwick Stone� (11/16/04)
- Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
- Re: MAN AS OLD AS COAL - World Mystery Park Marc Granby (11/17/04)
Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
- Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/16/04)
  - Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
  - Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Marten (11/18/04)
- Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Titan Point (11/16/04)
  - Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
- Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Ken S. Tucker (11/16/04)
  - Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/16/04)
    - Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup Ken S. Tucker (11/17/04)
- Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/17/04)
  - Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup George Hammond (11/17/04)
    - Re: Hammond's moderated newsgroup ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/18/04)
Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (11/16/04)
- Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Uncle Al (11/16/04)
  - Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Androcles (11/17/04)
(SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (11/16/04)
- Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (11/16/04)
  - Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/17/04)
Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (11/16/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (11/16/04)
  - Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (11/17/04)
    - Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Titan Point (11/17/04)
    - Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (11/16/04)
- Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Uncle Al (11/16/04)
  - Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Androcles (11/17/04)
Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/15/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
  - Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
  - Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Ben Bean (11/16/04)
- Re: Limitations of Sagnac generality Paul B. Andersen (11/16/04)
Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/15/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. Dirk Van de moortel (11/15/04)
  - Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. Bilge (11/16/04)
  - Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. Titan Point (11/16/04)
  - Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
- Re: Conceptualization test. greywolf42 (11/16/04)
  - Re: Conceptualization test. AllYou! (11/16/04)
Let.s fight against InfoRelation - spamming service!!! inforelation55 (11/15/04)
How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. joseph levy (11/15/04)
- Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
  - Re: How the 'apparent' speed of light invariance follows from Lorenz contraction. AllYou! (11/16/04)
A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/15/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/15/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Eugene Shubert (11/15/04)
  - Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Titan Point (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Bilge (11/16/04)
  - Re: A simple test of the constancy of c jahn (11/15/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Len Gaasenbeek (11/16/04)
  - Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Androcles (11/16/04)
- Re: A simple test of the constancy of c Max Keon (11/17/04)
Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/15/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry Bill Hobba (11/15/04)
  - Re: Universal Metasymmetry AllYou! (11/16/04)
  - Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/17/04)
- Re: Universal Metasymmetry ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/19/04)
  - Re: Universal Metasymmetry Russell E. Rierson (11/19/04)
Re: Roberts' persusaive rhetoric. mike3 (11/15/04)
Re: Retic Postings and SPAM Bilge (11/15/04)
Defining Terms Margaret Kelso (11/15/04)
- Re: Defining Terms Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
Zeno Margaret Kelso (11/15/04)
- Re: Zeno Androcles (11/15/04)
Re: The *REAL* story of co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
- Re: The *REAL* story of co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/15/04)
Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
- Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy ZZBunker (11/14/04)
  - Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy EL (11/14/04)
- Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy Mike (11/14/04)
  - Re: Newton's Principia: Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy David Evens (11/15/04)
Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
- Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
  - Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: Scholium Morituri-Max (11/14/04)
Newton's Principia: Definitions: I - IV Isaac Newton (11/14/04)
- Re: Newton's Principia: Definitions: I - IV Sam Wormley (11/15/04)
Bomb paradox mtm (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
  - Re: Bomb paradox mtm (11/14/04)
  - Re: Bomb paradox Benno Muilwyk (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox Martin Hogbin (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox Benno Muilwyk (11/14/04)
- Re: Bomb paradox eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
  - Re: Bomb paradox eleaticus (11/20/04)
    - Re: Bomb paradox Androcles (11/20/04)
Corrected Lecture 1 on Metric Engineering Stargates and Warp Drive Jack Sarfatti (11/14/04)
- Re: Corrected Lecture 1 on Metric Engineering Stargates and Warp Drive Ken S. Tucker (11/15/04)
Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/13/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. jahn (11/13/04)
  - Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/14/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Androcles (11/14/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/14/04)
  - Re: Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/18/04)
    - Re: Confusion about time. Paul B. Andersen (11/19/04)
    - Re: Confusion about time. John Kennaugh (11/20/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. Bilge (11/15/04)
- Re: Confusion about time. AllYou! (11/15/04)
  - Re: Confusion about time. Dirk Van de moortel (11/15/04)
    - Re: Confusion about time. AllYou! (11/15/04)
Sarfatti Lectures on Metric Engineering of Warp, Wormhole & WMD (W^3) Jack Sarfatti (11/13/04)
Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy xxein (11/13/04)
- Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
- Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy MP (11/13/04)
  - Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy xxein (11/14/04)
    - Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy MP (11/14/04)
Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/13/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Bill Hobba (11/13/04)
  - Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
  - Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation - first paradox eelgro (11/15/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
- treply eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/14/04)
  - Re: treply N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/14/04)
  - Re: treply Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/18/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/18/04)
- Re: Sample of my SR model"s interpretation eelgro_at_yahoo.com (11/20/04)
Re: Infinity or finity?? Paul Cardinale (11/13/04)
Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
- Re: The Paradox of Zeno Virgil (11/12/04)
  - Re: The Paradox of Zeno eleaticus (11/12/04)
Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Jason W. Hinson (11/12/04)
- Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ V ertner Vergon (11/14/04)
- Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Twittering One (11/15/04)
Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/11/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/12/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time suzysewnshow (11/13/04)
- Re: Detecting Space-Time jahn (11/13/04)
  - Re: Detecting Space-Time Androcles (11/13/04)
Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Ja Lar (11/11/04)
- Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Androcles (11/11/04)
Einstein: Release of Volume 9, The Berlin Years Ron (11/10/04)
On the use of definitions in discussing physics AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics robert j. kolker (11/10/04)
  - Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics Dirk Van de moortel (11/10/04)
    - Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics AllYou! (11/10/04)
- Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
  - Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics AllYou! (11/10/04)
    - Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics Bill Hobba (11/10/04)
    - Re: On the use of definitions in discussing physics AllYou! (11/11/04)
Non Abelian Universe? Russell E. Rierson (11/10/04)
Non Abelian Universe? Russell E. Rierson (11/10/04)
Gravitational Time Sam. Mitchell (11/10/04)
- Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
  - Re: Gravitational Time Sam. jahn (11/10/04)
    - Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
- Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (11/10/04)
- Re: Gravitational Time Sam. Eric Gisse (11/10/04)
Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Mitchell (11/10/04)
- Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Sam Wormley (11/10/04)
  - Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Fred McGalliard (11/11/04)
- Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes Crown-Horned Snorkack (11/10/04)
- Re: When Light Waves are Bigger than Black Holes ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/12/04)
Einstein Revolutionary Theater Lazy Dog Society Jack Sarfatti (11/10/04)
- Re: Einstein Revolutionary Theater Lazy Dog Society Ken S. Tucker (11/10/04)
  - Re: Einstein Revolutionary Theater Lazy Dog Society Smokey (11/10/04)
Question about change-of-basis bars Paul (11/09/04)
- Re: Question about change-of-basis bars Jon Hurwitz (11/13/04)
Re: Universe = Mind Thalassa (11/09/04)
Re Einstein (1905) Absurdities Adrian Mark Armstrong (11/09/04)
- Re: Re Einstein (1905) Absurdities Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) shevek (11/12/04)
  - Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? (#14) Bilge (11/12/04)
Re: Big Bang Question nightbat (11/09/04)
Re: Question about God=G_uv Athina Georgiadou (11/09/04)
- Re: Question about God=G_uv Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
  - Re: Question about God=G_uv Moonshadao (11/09/04)
New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation YBM (11/09/04)
- Re: New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
- Re: New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
- Re: New entry in crank.net : An Intuitive Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation Harry (11/11/04)
Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
- Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Androcles (11/09/04)
  - Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Eric Gisse (11/09/04)
- Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? nospam (11/09/04)
  - Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (11/09/04)
- Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? V ertner Vergon (11/11/04)
  - Re: What's the Matter with Einstein? Greysky (11/12/04)
Meaning of "weight" in general relativity Jack Sarfatti (11/08/04)
- Re: Meaning of "weight" in general relativity Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
Why is the speed of light as it is Alex C.P (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Androcles (11/08/04)
  - Re: Why is the speed of light as it is AllYou! (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is greywolf42 (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Ron ++++++ (11/08/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is FrediFizzx (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is John C. Polasek (11/09/04)
- Re: Why is the speed of light as it is kenseto (11/09/04)
  - Re: Why is the speed of light as it is Henri Wilson (11/13/04)
Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Tom Roberts (11/08/04)
  - Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Androcles (11/08/04)
  - Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/08/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> shevek (11/08/04)
  - Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Bill Hobba (11/09/04)
    - Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> shevek (11/09/04)
  - Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/09/04)
    - Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> MP (11/09/04)
    - Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/09/04)
- Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> tfleming1_at_hotkey.net.au (11/09/04)
  - Re: Is there any royal road to General Relativity? <eom> Satya Das (11/09/04)
WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Moderate Mammal (11/08/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/08/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
    - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 SueNet (11/08/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 K. A. Cannon (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 SueNet (11/08/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Russell B Waters (11/08/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/08/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Justice-for-all (11/08/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards & BUSH MASSACRE The Observer (11/13/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone� (11/09/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bilge (11/09/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chuck Lysaght (11/11/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/11/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/11/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bookman (11/13/04)
    - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/13/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 =The Commentator = (11/12/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Dr. Flonkenstein (11/12/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/12/04)
- Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/15/04)
  - Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/15/04)
Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Mitchell (11/08/04)
- Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Mark Fergerson (11/08/04)
  - Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Mitchell (11/09/04)
- Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Eric Gisse (11/08/04)
  - Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Dirk Van de moortel (11/08/04)
    - Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle John Zinni (11/08/04)
- Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Patrick Reany (11/08/04)
- Re: Generalizing the Equivalence Principle Uncle Al (11/08/04)
Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? J Jensen (11/08/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/08/04)
  - Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/09/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Edward Green (11/09/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/15/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Edward Green (11/15/04)
  - Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/15/04)
    - Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (11/18/04)
    - Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (11/18/04)
- Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
  - Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Tom Roberts (11/17/04)
SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/08/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Randy Poe (11/08/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Tom Roberts (11/09/04)
  - Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (11/09/04)
  - Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this Nicolaas Vroom (11/11/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this jem (11/09/04)
- Re: SR Length Contraction - how do physicists explain this xxein (11/19/04)
Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/07/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/07/04)
  - Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
    - Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bill Hobba (11/08/04)
  - Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Greysky (11/08/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action Bilge (11/07/04)
- Re: Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action ZZBunker (11/08/04)
Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field robert j. kolker (11/07/04)
  - Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Dirk Van de moortel (11/07/04)
  - Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/07/04)
  - Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
    - Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/09/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field RP (11/08/04)
  - Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/07/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Randy Poe (11/08/04)
  - Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/08/04)
  - Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/08/04)
  - Re: Definition of A Field kenseto (11/08/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field John Chelen (11/10/04)
  - Re: Definition of A Field Androcles (11/10/04)
  - Re: Definition of A Field Bilge (11/12/04)
    - Re: Definition of A Field ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/13/04)
- Re: Definition of A Field Sam Wormley (11/13/04)
Re: Twins paradox, redux Dirk Van de moortel (11/07/04)
- Re: Twins paradox, redux jahn (11/07/04)
- Re: Twins paradox, redux bernard.chaverondier (11/07/04)
The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bilge (11/07/04)
  - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Gregory L. Hansen (11/07/04)
  - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/07/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Uncle Al (11/08/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Gene Ward Smith (11/08/04)
  - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Will Twentyman (11/08/04)
  - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/09/04)
    - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Will Twentyman (11/09/04)
    - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/09/04)
  - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Eugene Shubert (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Anon (11/10/04)
  - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Anon (11/10/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/11/04)
  - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Chan-Ho Suh (11/11/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Jem (11/12/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help jem (11/13/04)
  - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Torkel Franzen (11/13/04)
  - Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bill Hobba (11/14/04)
- Re: The Nature of Mathematics - a plea for help Bill Hobba (11/16/04)
Special for The Ghost in the Machine eleaticus (11/06/04)
- Re: Special for The Ghost in the Machine Dirk Van de moortel (11/06/04)
- Re: Special for The Ghost in the Machine Eric Gisse (11/07/04)
- Re: Special for The Ghost in the Machine The Ghost In The Machine (11/07/04)
Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/06/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation stephen_at_nomail.com (11/06/04)
  - Re: Explaining Time Dilation TomGee (11/07/04)
- Re: Explaining Time Dilation Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
Re: A New Definition for "TIME" kenseto (11/06/04)
- Re: A New Definition for "TIME" TomGee (11/07/04)
  - Re: A New Definition for "TIME" kenseto (11/07/04)
    - Re: A New Definition for "TIME" Bilge (11/09/04)
  - Re: A New Definition for "TIME" The Ghost In The Machine (11/07/04)
Re: The Nature of Mass robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
Do Virtual Photons Exist? T Einsteinhoax (11/06/04)
- Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? T Satya Das (11/08/04)
Re: Drag Free Control jahn (11/06/04)
- Re: Drag Free Control Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Drag Free Control Paul B. Andersen (11/07/04)
Almost Everything is Expanding Ray Tomes (11/05/04)
- Re: Almost Everything is Expanding N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/05/04)
  - Re: Almost Everything is Expanding Ray Tomes (11/06/04)
    - Re: Almost Everything is Expanding N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/06/04)
- Re: Almost Everything is Expanding Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: Almost Everything is Expanding Uncle Al (11/06/04)
  - Re: Almost Everything is Expanding Androcles (11/06/04)
- Re: Almost Everything is Expanding EL (11/06/04)
  - Re: Almost Everything is Expanding nightbat (11/07/04)
- Re: Almost Everything is Expanding MP (11/06/04)
  - Re: Almost Everything is Expanding Einsteinhoax (11/06/04)
Aliens at CERN????-Centre Europeene por la Recherche Nucleaire K_Loupspeed (11/05/04)
On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/05/04)
- Re: On the observation of a moving object. YBM (11/05/04)
  - Re: On the observation of a moving object. kenneth couesbouc (11/06/04)
Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/05/04)
  - Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/05/04)
  - Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/07/04)
    - Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge Androcles (11/07/04)
    - Re: Coulomb and Lorentz Gauge jahn (11/08/04)
Corpuscular Photons jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons jahn (11/05/04)
- Re: Corpuscular Photons Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
  - Re: Corpuscular Photons jahn (11/05/04)
Re: Paradise 873 : a spreading meme John Vreeland (11/05/04)
A Unified Field Theory Bill Clark (11/04/04)
- Re: A Unified Field Theory Creighton Hogg (11/04/04)
- Re: A Unified Field Theory shuba (11/04/04)
- Re: A Unified Field Theory ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/05/04)
- Re: A Unified Field Theory josefmatz (11/05/04)
USAF Report on Warp, Wormhole and WMD Jack Sarfatti (11/04/04)
- Re: USAF Report on Warp, Wormhole and WMD robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
  - Re: USAF Report on Warp, Wormhole and WMD John Vreeland (11/05/04)
speed addition depend on the clock synchro beda pietanza (11/04/04)
- Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
  - Re: speed addition depend on the clock synchro beda pietanza (11/06/04)
Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? Eugene Shubert (11/04/04)
Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Mike (11/04/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Tom Roberts (11/04/04)
  - Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia Mike (11/05/04)
- Re: Dr. T. Roberts operated on GR with LOCAL anesthesia bernard.chaverondier (11/06/04)
Double-think, Len Gaasenbeek (11/04/04)
- Re: Double-think, Dirk Van de moortel (11/04/04)
  - Re: Double-think, Pentcho Valev (11/05/04)
  - Re: Double-think, Len Gaasenbeek (11/07/04)
Einstein's Thoughts on America (1921) Brandon (11/04/04)
Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/04/04)
Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Mitchell (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Silas (11/04/04)
  - Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
    - Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator robo lemon (11/06/04)
    - Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/06/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
  - Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator robert j. kolker (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator shevek (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Paul Cardinale (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Uncle Al (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Morituri-Max (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Bruce Pew (11/04/04)
- Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator Harry Conover (11/04/04)
  - Re: Kerry needs to be removed as a Senator David Evens (11/06/04)
Star Gate Teleportation Zero Point Energy Field Equations Jack Sarfatti (11/04/04)
- Re: Star Gate Teleportation Zero Point Energy Field Equations The Ghost In The Machine (11/04/04)
Re: Photons Under Control tfleming1_at_hotkey.net.au (11/03/04)
Landau & Lifshitz on Gravity Jack Sarfatti (11/03/04)
about EPR and the way information travels Thierry (11/03/04)
- Re: about EPR and the way information travels Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
  - Re: about EPR and the way information travels Ilja Schmelzer (11/05/04)
    - Re: about EPR and the way information travels Bill Hobba (11/05/04)
- Re: about EPR and the way information travels Tom Roberts (11/03/04)
  - Re: about EPR and the way information travels Ilja Schmelzer (11/05/04)
- Re: about EPR and the way information travels Bilge (11/04/04)
  - Re: about EPR and the way information travels Ilja Schmelzer (11/05/04)
    - Re: about EPR and the way information travels Bilge (11/05/04)
why no private company designs ?? . . . (UFO, Zero Point Energy, ETC...) Transition Zone (11/03/04)
- Re: why no private company designs ?? . . . (UFO, Zero Point Energy, ETC...) Ellen Simonetti (11/03/04)
  - Re: why no private company designs ?? . . . (UFO, Zero Point Energy, ETC...) robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
    - Re: why no private company designs ?? . . . (UFO, Zero Point Energy, ETC...) Emiello Estives (11/03/04)
    - Re: why no private company designs ?? . . . (UFO, Zero Point Energy, ETC...) DrPostman (11/03/04)
- Re: why no private company designs ?? . . . (UFO, Zero Point Energy, ETC...) Malcolm (11/06/04)
Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
  - Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/03/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/04/04)
  - Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/04/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/05/04)
  - Re: Revised Hypothesis AllYou! (11/05/04)
  - Re: Revised Hypothesis Harry (11/13/04)
    - Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/14/04)
    - Re: Revised Hypothesis Harry (11/16/04)
- Re: Revised Hypothesis xxein (11/05/04)
Re: BIG BANG NOISE---Listen Above The Noise nightbat (11/03/04)
Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/02/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? stephen_at_nomail.com (11/02/04)
  - Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/03/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Harry (11/03/04)
  - Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/04/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Bilge (11/04/04)
  - Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Harry (11/04/04)
  - Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/05/04)
- Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/04/04)
  - Re: Is the mass of a free falling body increasing? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/05/04)
Alleged USAF/DIA UFO Metric Engineering Meeting in DC Jack Sarfatti (11/02/04)
Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (11/02/04)
- Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (11/02/04)
Yikes, utterly hairy math! Ben Bean (11/02/04)
- Re: Yikes, utterly hairy math! Ben Bean (11/03/04)
Yikes, utterly hairy math! Ben Bean (11/02/04)
- Re: Yikes, utterly hairy math! Tom Roberts (11/03/04)
- Re: Yikes, utterly hairy math! Paul B. Andersen (11/04/04)
  - Re: Yikes, utterly hairy math! Ben Bean (11/04/04)
Re: Ken, need help with this Pmb (11/02/04)
"Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Lanifq (11/02/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Eugene Shubert (11/02/04)
  - Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Harry (11/03/04)
    - Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Eugene Shubert (11/03/04)
    - Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Harry (11/04/04)
- Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" Ken Seto (11/05/04)
  - Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity" The Ghost In The Machine (11/06/04)
Communicating at Translight Velocities Lanifq (11/02/04)
- Re: Communicating at Translight Velocities Eugene Shubert (11/02/04)
Re: Michelson-Morley & Miller Bilge (11/02/04)
Profanes' education Pentcho Valev (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Dirk Van de moortel (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/02/04)
- Re: Profanes' education Tom Roberts (11/02/04)
  - Re: Profanes' education Androcles (11/02/04)
  - Re: Profanes' education Harry (11/02/04)
Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/01/04)
- Re: question about e=mc^2 shuba (11/02/04)
  - Re: question about e=mc^2 Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (11/03/04)
Re: Quantum cosmology MP (11/01/04)
- Re: Quantum cosmology Bilge (11/02/04)
  - Re: Quantum cosmology MP (11/02/04)
- Re: Quantum cosmology Ilja Schmelzer (11/03/04)
  - Re: Quantum cosmology MP (11/03/04)
    - Re: Quantum cosmology MP (11/03/04)
Re: johnreed take V.I johnlawrencereed (11/01/04)
- Re: johnreed take V.I ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/02/04)
  - Re: johnreed take V.I johnlawrencereed (11/02/04)
    - Re: johnreed take V.I ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/05/04)
    - Re: johnreed take V.I johnlawrencereed (11/13/04)
- Re: johnreed take V.I johnlawrencereed (11/02/04)
Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (Was SR) Nicolaas Vroom (11/01/04)
- Re: How important is GR inorder to calc the precession of Mercury (Was SR) Ken S. Tucker (11/02/04)
Metric Engineering Star Gates Jack Sarfatti (11/01/04)
Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/01/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/01/04)
  - Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science ande452_at_attglobal.net (11/02/04)
  - Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bilge (11/02/04)
    - Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
  - Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Ilja Schmelzer (11/03/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/03/04)
  - Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
    - Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/06/04)
    - Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science John Kennaugh (11/03/04)
  - Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Bill Hobba (11/04/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Eric Baird (11/07/04)
  - Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Eric Baird (11/08/04)
- Re: Relativity, Scepticism and Humility in Science Eric Baird (11/07/04)
Michelson's Interference Experiment - H.A.Lorentz Androcles (11/01/04)
- Re: Michelson's Interference Experiment - H.A.Lorentz Dirk Van de moortel (11/01/04)
  - Re: Michelson's Interference Experiment - H.A.Lorentz AllYou! (11/01/04)
Re: A definition of time. stephen_at_nomail.com (11/01/04)
- Re: A definition of time. AllYou! (11/01/04)
  - Re: A definition of time. Daniel Weston (11/02/04)
What's missing? AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? Dirk Van de moortel (11/01/04)
  - Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? The Ghost In The Machine (11/01/04)
  - Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? Paul B. Andersen (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
  - Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: What's missing? Bilge (11/02/04)
  - Re: What's missing? AllYou! (11/02/04)
Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (11/01/04)
- Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (11/02/04)
  - Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Pax (11/04/04)
    - Re: Part 2 Re: Ken, need help with this Ken S. Tucker (11/05/04)
Re: Define a clock AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Define a clock AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Define a clock AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Define a clock AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Define a clock jem (11/01/04)
  - Re: Define a clock AllYou! (11/01/04)
  - Re: Define a clock Bill Hobba (11/03/04)
Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (11/01/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. RP (11/02/04)
  - Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (11/02/04)
- Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. ZZBunker (11/13/04)
Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Peter J Ross (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 caryrjr (11/01/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 CND (11/01/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone� (11/01/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 DrPostman (11/01/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Fuming Gator (11/01/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Spike \ (11/01/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/01/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Fyre (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/01/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Art Deco (11/02/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone� (11/02/04)
    - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Art Deco (11/02/04)
    - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 TMG (11/02/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Charles Newton (11/02/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/05/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Dr. Artemis \ (11/02/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
    - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Dr. Artemis \ (11/03/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Roofshadow (11/02/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 bluemoon (11/02/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 =The Commentator = (11/02/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger (11/02/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Larry Huntley (11/08/04)
- Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bookman (11/08/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone� (11/08/04)
    - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Bookman (11/08/04)
    - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Chadwick Stone� (11/08/04)
  - Re: VOTE! - Usenet Kook Awards, October 2004 Lady Chatterly (11/08/04)
Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (11/01/04)
- Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Uncle Al (11/01/04)
  - Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities David Evens (11/03/04)
(SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (11/01/04)
- Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (11/01/04)
Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (11/01/04)
- Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Uncle Al (11/01/04)
Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (11/01/04)
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (11/01/04)
Entropy of Universe Jack Sarfatti (11/01/04)
Twin Paradox in non-trivial spatial topologies Tom Roberts (11/01/04)
- Re: Twin Paradox in non-trivial spatial topologies shuba (11/01/04)
- Re: Twin Paradox in non-trivial spatial topologies Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
  - Re: Twin Paradox in non-trivial spatial topologies Eric Gisse (11/01/04)
    - Re: Twin Paradox in non-trivial spatial topologies Eugene Shubert (11/02/04)
    - Re: Twin Paradox in non-trivial spatial topologies Eric Gisse (11/03/04)
On Light bending Bilal Sallakh (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
- Re: On Light bending Randy M. Dumse (11/01/04)
  - Re: On Light bending Harry (11/01/04)
Re: Religious terminology question George Hammond (11/01/04)
- Re: Religious terminology question Pax (11/01/04)
Anti+truths: Splitting The Truth ! caesarjbsquitti (11/01/04)
Re: The physics of Truth ! ? caesarjbsquitti (11/01/04)
Re: 25,000 Euros to explain Relativity in less than 5 minutes George Hammond (11/01/04)
Re: Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock Bilge (10/31/04)
Re: SR, curvature terms, and Realms of Validity Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: SR, curvature terms, and Realms of Validity Eric Baird (11/01/04)
299,792,458 ? Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: 299,792,458 ? Eric Gisse (11/01/04)
  - Re: 299,792,458 ? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/01/04)
- Re: 299,792,458 ? Dirk Van de moortel (11/01/04)
Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Bill Hobba (10/31/04)
- Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal vonroach (11/01/04)
  - Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Tom Roberts (11/01/04)
  - Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal Bill Hobba (11/02/04)
Re: How can I become an expert anti-relativist? Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: How can I become an expert anti-relativist? Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
  - Re: How can I become an expert anti-relativist? MP (11/01/04)
- Re: How can I become an expert anti-relativist? MP (11/01/04)
Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (10/31/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bilge (10/31/04)
  - Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/03/04)
    - Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bilge (11/04/04)
    - Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/06/04)
- Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
  - Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system greywolf42 (11/01/04)
  - Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system John Kennaugh (11/03/04)
Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month (was: Re: Hammond Teh Moderator) Jim Black (10/31/04)
- Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month TMG (10/31/04)
  - Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month TMG (10/31/04)
    - Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month George Hammond (11/01/04)
    - Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month bv_schornak (11/01/04)
Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month TMG (11/01/04)
Re: [OT in SPR] NOMINATION - George Hammond for Usenet Kook of the Month stew dean (11/01/04)
Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation George Hammond (10/31/04)
- Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/31/04)
- Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation ZenIsWhen (10/31/04)
Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/31/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES V ertner Vergon (10/31/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES Bill Hobba (10/31/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION,TWIN PARADOX,SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES greywolf42 (11/01/04)
Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Patrick Reany (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Paul Stowe (10/31/04)
  - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
    - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? robert j. kolker (11/01/04)
    - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? robert j. kolker (10/31/04)
  - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (10/31/04)
  - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Wouter (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Randy M. Dumse (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bill Hobba (10/31/04)
  - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? robert j. kolker (11/01/04)
    - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bill Hobba (11/01/04)
    - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Patrick Reany (11/01/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Eugene Shubert (11/01/04)
  - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? robert j. kolker (11/01/04)
  - Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Precisely (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Precisely (11/02/04)
- Re: Should math be held to be literally the 'language of physics'? Jon Hurwitz (11/02/04)
Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (10/31/04)
- Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Aleksandr Timofeev (11/02/04)
  - Re: Quantum Paradox of a Self-Interference of a Photon in VLBI Quantum Mirror (11/02/04)
Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (10/31/04)
  - Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/04/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/01/04)
  - Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/01/04)
    - Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? sal (11/01/04)
    - Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/01/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Paul B. Andersen (11/01/04)
  - Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? suzysewnshow (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? V ertner Vergon (11/04/04)
  - Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? John Kennaugh (11/08/04)
- Re: Einstein's Doppler equation wrong? Androcles (11/07/04)
Re: How to built a universal clock Len Gaasenbeek (10/31/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Y.Porat (10/31/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock shevek (10/31/04)
  - Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (10/31/04)
  - Re: How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (11/02/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock RP (11/01/04)
  - Re: How to built a universal clock Uncle Al (11/01/04)
    - Re: How to built a universal clock RP (11/01/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (11/01/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (11/01/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (11/01/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Henri Wilson (11/05/04)
  - Re: How to built a universal clock Sam Wormley (11/05/04)
- Re: How to built a universal clock Patrick Reany (11/13/04)
  - Re: How to built a universal clock kenseto (11/14/04)
Re: OK, I'm Ready For the Patronizing Insults From the Resident Gurus! Paul B. Andersen (10/31/04)
Re: Mind-set. Len Gaasenbeek (10/31/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: Mind-set. Bill Hobba (10/31/04)
  - Re: Mind-set. Malcolm (11/03/04)
Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/31/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/31/04)
  - Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (11/01/04)
- Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/01/04)
Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (10/31/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
  - Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Paul B. Andersen (11/01/04)
- Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? TomGee (11/02/04)
  - Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Androcles (11/02/04)
  - Re: Einstein ever defined TIME? Henri Wilson (11/06/04)
Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/31/04)
- Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/31/04)
- Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one V ertner Vergon (10/31/04)
  - Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one TomGee (11/01/04)
- Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one Andre Bonin (11/07/04)
  - Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one robert j. kolker (11/08/04)
    - Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one Andre Bonin (11/08/04)
*Minkowski * metric & ISU (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/31/04)
- Re: *Minkowski * metric & ISU (kst) ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/31/04)
  - Re: *Minkowski * metric & ISU (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/01/04)
- Re: *Minkowski * metric & ISU (kst) shevek (10/31/04)
  - Re: *Minkowski * metric & ISU (kst) Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
    - Re: *Minkowski * metric & ISU (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/01/04)
    - Re: *Minkowski * metric & ISU (kst) shevek (11/02/04)
  - Re: *Minkowski * metric & ISU (kst) Ken S. Tucker (11/01/04)
black holes and singularity alistair (10/31/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity MP (10/31/04)
  - Re: black holes and singularity Randy M. Dumse (10/31/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
  - Re: black holes and singularity alistair (11/02/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Eric Gisse (11/01/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Eric Gisse (11/05/04)
  - Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/05/04)
- Re: black holes and singularity Ken S. Tucker (11/05/04)
  - Re: black holes and singularity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (11/06/04)
The universality of free fall conspiracy Mike (10/31/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Dirk Van de moortel (10/31/04)
  - Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Mike (11/01/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Sam Wormley (10/31/04)
  - Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Mike (11/01/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
  - Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Mike (11/01/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Uncle Al (10/31/04)
  - Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Mike (11/01/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Androcles (10/31/04)
- Re: The universality of free fall conspiracy Eric Gisse (10/31/04)
Re: OK Eric Gisse (10/31/04)
- Re: OK Paul B. Andersen (10/31/04)
  - Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/01/04)
- Re: OK The Ghost In The Machine (10/31/04)
  - Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/01/04)
    - Re: OK The Ghost In The Machine (11/02/04)
    - Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/03/04)
- Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/01/04)
  - Re: OK Eric Gisse (11/02/04)
    - Re: OK Henri Wilson (11/03/04)
Re: zero and infinity Revisited Eric Gisse (10/31/04)
- Re: zero and infinity Revisited Dirk Van de moortel (10/31/04)
  - Re: zero and infinity Revisited Max Keon (11/02/04)
    - Re: zero and infinity Revisited Max Keon (11/07/04)
- Re: zero and infinity Revisited Max Keon (11/02/04)
  - Re: zero and infinity Revisited Eric Gisse (11/03/04)
Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (10/31/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/01/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/01/04)
  - Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (11/05/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/03/04)
  - Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (11/04/04)
- Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Paul B. Andersen (11/03/04)
Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. YBM (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Eric Gisse (10/31/04)
  - Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Marcus Wellpoth (10/31/04)
  - Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. John Kennaugh (10/31/04)
  - Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Tom Roberts (11/01/04)
  - Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. sal (11/01/04)
    - Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Androcles (11/01/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
- Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. Henri Wilson (10/31/04)
  - Re: Diffraction Angle form a Moving Grating. David Evens (11/01/04)
Re: Abandon hope all ye who enter here Ken S. Tucker (10/31/04)
- Re: Abandon hope all ye who enter here Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
Re: TIME DILATION Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/03/04)
  - Re: TIME DILATION Marcus Wellpoth (11/04/04)
    - Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/04/04)
    - Re: TIME DILATION Bill Hobba (11/07/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION TomGee (11/03/04)
  - Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/03/04)
- Re: TIME DILATION V ertner Vergon (11/03/04)
  - Re: TIME DILATION Androcles (11/03/04)
    - Re: TIME DILATION Dirk Van de moortel (11/03/04)
Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/31/04)
  - Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Tom Roberts (10/31/04)
- Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark nightbat (11/07/04)
Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/31/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Ken S. Tucker (10/31/04)
  - Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/31/04)
    - Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Ken S. Tucker (10/31/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/31/04)
  - Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/31/04)
- Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (11/01/04)
Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/01/04)
  - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. bernard.chaverondier (11/08/04)
  - Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity. Eugene Stefanovich (11/08/04)
Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system bernard.chaverondier (10/31/04)
  - Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Bilge (11/02/04)
Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Larry Burford (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Larry Burford (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Larry Burford (10/31/04)
- Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Dennis McCarthy (11/17/04)
  - Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity Dennis McCarthy (11/20/04)
Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/31/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (10/31/04)
  - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (10/31/04)
    - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (11/01/04)
    - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
  - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/31/04)
  - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Patrick Reany (10/31/04)
  - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. greywolf42 (11/01/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
  - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Dirk Van de moortel (11/01/04)
    - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
  - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. Bilge (11/02/04)
- Re: Scientifically valid definitions. AllYou! (11/01/04)
  - Re: Scientifically valid definitions. shevek (11/02/04)

sci.physics.relativityBy Thread

sci.physics.relativity
By Thread