Re: Definition of A Field

From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 11/22/04 

Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:36:01 +0100

kenseto wrote:
> "Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
> news:cnq531$ont$2@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
>
>>kenseto wrote:
>>
>>>"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
>>>news:306kh0F2reh6aU2@uni-berlin.de...
>>>
>>>
>>>>kenseto wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>The correct ether theory is not a fliud ether. It is a structured ether
>>>
>>>that
>>>
>>>
>>>>>will support transverse waves. Such an ether described in the following
>>>>>links:
>>>>>http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf
>>>>
>>>>For which there is not an iota of experimental evidence.
>>>
>>>
>>>Hey idiot you accept Einstein gedanken as experimental evidence.
>>
>>No, he doesn't. Why on earth do you think so?
>
>
> Yes both of you did exactly that.

No, we didn't.

> You accepted Einstein's train gedanken

We accepted his gedanken experiment as a logical demonstration
of the concept. Not as experimental evidence. Try to understand
the difference.

> that derive the bogus concept of relativity of simultaneity. .

There is nothing bogus about that.

>>>I have a
>>>doable experiment that will detect the existence of the ether.
>>
>>How do you know that it will detect the existence of the ether?
>
>
> if the experiment failed then there is no ether and if the experiment
> detected absolute motion then there is an ether.

But how can you say with such certainty that it *will*
indeed detect the existence of the ether?

>>I.e. how can you *know* that it is there although there is
>>no direct experimental evidence for it yet?
>
>
> What kind of idiot are you??

The kind of "idiot" who managed to obtain a PhD.

> I said that you need to do one of the following
> experiments that could falsify the existenc of an ether.
> 1. Do an OWLS experiment with two spatially separated and synchronized
> clocks.
> 2.do the experiment described in the following link:
> http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf

I notice that you did not answer my question: how do
you *know* that there is an ether, although there is no direct
experimental evidence for it yet?

>>>>Speculations are cheaper than borscht.
>>>
>>>
>>>So Einstein's gedankens are not speculations?
>>
>>No, they aren't.
>
>
> Fucking religious idiot.

I am an atheist.

Bye,
Bjoern

Quantcast