Re: Confusion about time.

From: Paul B. Andersen (paul.b.andersen_at_deletethis.hia.no)
Date: 11/23/04


Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:02:01 +0100

Henri Wilson skrev:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:37:34 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
> <paul.b.andersen@deletethis.hia.no> wrote:
>
>>The scenario we are discussing is still the following:
>>
>>Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>| A short light pulse is bouncing up and down between
>>| two horizontal mirrors. The path of the light pulse
>>| is vertical in the light clock frame.
>>|
>>| The very same light path in the rest
>>| frame of an arbitrary observer, where the light
>>| clock is moving at v:
>>|
>>| -----------------
>>| /\ /\
>>| / \ / \
>>| \/ \/ \/
>>| -----------------
>>
>>You made a blunder when you to this responded:
>>| I have explained to you many times that this is wrong.
>>
>>That blunder cannot be unmade by talking nonsense
>>about bending steel pipes.
>>The only way out is to admit that you were wrong.
>>Anything else will only make you look even more foolish.
>
>
> Paul, the light beam remains vertical in all frames.
> Like the vertical pipe, the whole thing moves sideways in the observer frame.

There is no continuous light beam in this scenario.
It is a short light pulse - a single photon, if you like.

> You haven't explained how the light beam bends in the middle if the observer
> moves away from the centre and not from one end.
>
> ____________
> /\
> / \ ______O
> \ /
> __\/________
>
>
> Place the observer in the middle of the light clock and see how stupid your
> claims are!!!
>
> Bent light!! HaHa!!!!
>
> Paul Andersen can bend steel pipes and light beams simply by moving sideways!!
> HaHa!!!

What's most amazing is that your stupidity
still is able to amaze me! :-)

Your condition is getting serious, Henri.
I think you understood this a year ago.

Paul



Relevant Pages

  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... at rest in the S' frame. ... So your x refers to a specific light pulse and your t refers to a path ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... at rest in the S' frame. ... So your x refers to a specific light pulse and your t refers to a path ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... at rest in the S' frame. ... So your x refers to a specific light pulse and your t refers to a path ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
    ... The animation below shows Jasper's and Zoe's observations of the ... In Jasper's frame, Zoe is travelling left to right at v = ... The red counters record each time that the light pulse strikes ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... at rest in the S' frame. ... If you apply length contraction, ... So your x refers to a specific light pulse and your t refers to a path ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)