Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS
From: Double Felix (nick_at_SKIPTHESECAPSbackpack.com)
Date: 11/24/04
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Simple Question"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Next in thread: TMG: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Reply: TMG: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:47:00 +0000 (UTC)
In article <rAXod.2$Ua.0@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.net> wrote:
> GOD FOR DUMMYS
>
> Take a close look at humanity for a minute. Forget about
> genetic differences and concentrate on "basic health".
> Irregardless of genetic makup there are people who are
> "very healthy" and people who are "very frail"... I mean even
> in the 1-40 year old population (forget old people for a minute).
> I mean, there are athletes, movie stars, soldiers etc. who are
> enormously healthy and well developed... then look around at the
> average person on the street... you don't see that kind of
> health/devlopment, to say nothing of all the under-average people.
> This is because of the "growth" difference among people... and
> the range is huge. You don't need scientific studies on the
> Secular Trend in human growth to see this... it's visible to the
> naked eye! It's the same thing as walking into a field of corn...
> some plants are 8' tall and some are 5' tall.... even in a crop
> where every seed is genetically identical! (I don't know about
> corn, but there are huge fields of Orchids in California that are
> all genetically identical... but their size varies widely
> depending on soil, sun and rain). The same is true of people!
> Or dogs and cats, or horses. There is "Nature and Nurture".
> Nature=genetics, and Nurture=growth. What we are talking about
> here, is GROWTH.
> What we observe is that every living human being has a
> "growth deficit"... no one ever reaches his "true height and
> weight". And this fact is as visible to the naked eye as
> the different sizes of those genetically identical Orchids.
> SO... when I say you can "see God"... what I'm saying
> is that if you look at a poorly grown adult person... and you
> can see what "he would have looked like" if he had reached
> more nearly full growth.... then you are in fact "seeing God".
> In fact... when you talk to this person... you are in fact...
> "talking to God". "God" in other words, is the invisible person
> that anyone would have been if he had reached more nearly
> a condition of full growth. Obviously, this is why we say
> "God is an invisible man".
> Now an experienced artist, is a person who is in the
> business of being able to paint or draw this "invisible person"
> that the actual person was supposed to look like if he had
> more nearly reached full growth. That's what everybody wants
> in life... "to be the person they should have been". That's
> why people "dress up", why girls wear "make up" and
> high heeled shoes... people are trying to look more like the
> "invisible person" they should have been.
> Now... the major impact of this universal dilemma is that
> it affects the BRAIN... if your body is undersize... your brain
> is undersize too.... and that means you're not going to
> see "true reality".... and that is what is so dangerous and
> controversial about "God". If your brain is not fully grown,
> the world is going to look BIGGER and FASTER than it actually
> is... just like it does to an ungrown child!
>
> Now, I can't believe that a person of normal intelligence
> can't understand that simple scientific explanation of God.
>
> Of cxourse I have not given the PROOF of all this... but the
> proof has been found and published in the peer reviewed
> literature by me (Hammond, 2003), and a copy of that published
> paper may be seen on my website at:
>
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html
>
> but I strongly recommend you read the first 4 pages of my
> website first... otherwise you will find it hard to
> understand:
>
> ====================================
> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
>
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> mirror site:
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> ====================================
> please ask you news server to add:
> alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
> ===================================
>
> this scientific paper actually proves that the "growth deficit"
> in human beings (as measured by the well known Secular Trend
> in human growth) causes a "Curvature of reality" and that
> is the scientific explanation of God. In fact, it proves
> that this curvature is given by: God=G_uv, where G_uv
> is the Einstein curvature of visible reality.
>
> Welcome to the
> WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC
> PROOF OF GOD
>
> George Hammond, 11-24-2004
Hey George!
Going to reprint Dembski's assessment of your theory for us yet?
- Felix
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Simple Question"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Next in thread: TMG: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Reply: TMG: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
