Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 11/25/04
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Definition of a Field"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: SR consistency is crap."
- In reply to: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Next in thread: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Reply: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Nov 2004 16:37:31 GMT
Eugene Stefanovich:
>Bilge:
>
>>
>> Take your pick of any two of the three operators.
>
>I do not understand your concerns here. Surely, f_i, p_i, and H do not
>commute with each other (in the general case).
Ergo, at least one of the three cannot be in your set of observables
for your states. By definition.
[...]
>>
>> I did the math above for you and proved that you can't both define
>> a force operator and have good states of momentum and energy. Hence,
>> if your states are good momentum abd energy states, f_i cannot
>> also be one of your observables. Period. This is not negotiable,
>> and if you object, read any introductory quantum mechanics text
>> or cite an online reference.
>
>I disagree. Observables (Hermitian operators) and states (unit vectors
>in the Hilbert space) are independent quantities.
I don't care if you disagree. Go look it up in any introductory quantum
mechanics book as I suggested. One of the reasons I have no interest in
continuing with this thread is that you bastardize terminology to suit
your agenda.
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Definition of a Field"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: SR consistency is crap."
- In reply to: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Next in thread: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Reply: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]