Re: The massless photon?
From: FrediFizzx (fredifizzx_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/02/04
- Next message: TMG: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: O'Barr 27 Nov 2004: Reasons for an ether."
- In reply to: David Evens: "Re: The massless photon?"
- Next in thread: David Evens: "Re: The massless photon?"
- Reply: David Evens: "Re: The massless photon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 19:01:37 -0800
"David Evens" <devens@technologist.com> wrote in message
news:185rq0pkj8bnecn9vj9pv80nu8pco7fh6e@4ax.com...
| On 30 Nov 2004 13:34:12 GMT, dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net
| (Bilge) wrote:
| > David Evens:
| >
| > >Actually, Bilge, charge ISN'T conserved in some weak interactions.
| >
| > Yes it is. The weak interaction does not violate conservation of
| >charge. If you think it does, give me an example of a reaction
| >that isn't charge conserving.
|
| Charged kaons have a weak decay mode that does not conserve charge.
Do you have a reference for that statement?
FrediFizzx
- Next message: TMG: "Re: GOD=G_uv GOD FOR DUMMYS"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: O'Barr 27 Nov 2004: Reasons for an ether."
- In reply to: David Evens: "Re: The massless photon?"
- Next in thread: David Evens: "Re: The massless photon?"
- Reply: David Evens: "Re: The massless photon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|