Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor.
From: Len Gaasenbeek (gaasbeek_at_rideau.net)
Date: 12/04/04
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: I Owe Einstein an Apology. Sorry Albert!"
- Previous message: Henri Wilson: "Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally."
- In reply to: jahn: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Reply: jahn: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 17:20:29 -0500
To Jahn (Sue?),
I enjoyed Jefferies paper titled: Waveguides and Cavity Resonators.
It was instructive although not entirely accurate as follows:
-1- An electrical current that travels through a wire is NOT one dimensional
since the individual electrons spin around their own axis and follow a
helical path, i.e. they are helical wave electrons which can have a choice
of frequency etc. as they travel through a copper wire (which has an
electrical resistance). In the case of an aerial or antenna, the helical
wave electrons can even be amplitude or frequency modulated.
-2- Waves on the surface of the water are a completely different kettle of
fish. Here the water molecules make up the medium through which the wave
travels, which is all. The water molecules move up and down when the wave
passes BUT NOTHING TRAVELS THROUGH THE WATER. That is to say, there are no
wave particles that travel from A to B.
The same holds for sound waves which also need a medium to travel through.
Again, there are no such things as sound particles.
-3- In the case of an electromagnetic wave, the helical wave photons not
only don't need a medium to travel through but only travel at maximum speed
(c) through a hard vacuum. Any medium, such as air for example, only slows
them down. That is to say, an electromagnetic wave such as light is made up
of speeding helical wave photons, that's all!
It is the inability of past (and present) physicists to distinguish between
'particle-waves' and 'medium-waves' which led to the confusion over the
duality of light, relativity and quantum mechanics etc.
The latter allows one to calculate relativistic effects but without an
understanding of what is actually happening. It gives results through the
use of special constants, rules and mathematics which have been twigged so
they will produce the right answer. Consequently, QM formulas aren't proper
formulas at all (since they are not based on physics) but strictly a means
to supply answers when you don't understand what's going on.
For more information see my "Selected Papers" at:
http://www2.rideau.net/gaasbeek
Enjoy, Len.
......................................................
"jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:31eio0F382i9gU1@individual.net...
>
> "Len Gaasenbeek" <gaasbeek@rideau.net> wrote in message
news:10r3juflfc5lo67@corp.supernews.com...
> [snip]
> > >
> > > Please have a look at this experiment which confirms the helical
travel of
> > > photons in waveguides.
> > > http://www.omsriram.com/Helical%20Travel%20of%20Light.htm
> > >
> > > Although I don't agree with everything in the paper, it makes
interesting
> > > reading.
> > >
> > > Enjoy, Len.
> > > ..............................................................
> [snip]
> > > > ...............................................
> >
> Of course helical waves exist. They eminate from crossed
> dipoles and antenna that look like bedsprings and most
> molecules.
> However, I think you'll find that waveguide current and voltage
> samples taken over the past 75 years, are more consistant
> with the modes illustrated in:
>
> http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/D.Jefferies/wguide.html
>
> than with the author's profound discovery that the E and H
> plane dimensions of commercially available waveguide has
> has a relationship to the useful frequency of operation.
>
> BTW... Feynman died before he could tell anyone how to
> build that "which slit" detector that he boldly claims is
> feasible in his book QED.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sue...
.........................................................
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: I Owe Einstein an Apology. Sorry Albert!"
- Previous message: Henri Wilson: "Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally."
- In reply to: jahn: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Reply: jahn: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|