Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor.
From: Androcles (dummy_at_dummy.net)
Date: 12/05/04
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: How wrong is this analogy for the curvature of Spacetime?"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: How wrong is this analogy for the curvature of Spacetime?"
- In reply to: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Next in thread: jahn: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 01:08:14 GMT
"Len Gaasenbeek" <gaasbeek@rideau.net> wrote in message
news:10r4e05b9092rb6@corp.supernews.com...
> To Jahn (Sue?),
>
> I enjoyed Jefferies paper titled: Waveguides and Cavity Resonators.
> It was instructive although not entirely accurate as follows:
>
> -1- An electrical current that travels through a wire is NOT one
> dimensional
> since the individual electrons spin around their own axis and follow a
> helical path, i.e. they are helical wave electrons which can have a
> choice
> of frequency etc. as they travel through a copper wire (which has an
> electrical resistance). In the case of an aerial or antenna, the
> helical
> wave electrons can even be amplitude or frequency modulated.
http://superconductors.org/Type2.htm
>
> -2- Waves on the surface of the water are a completely different
> kettle of
> fish. Here the water molecules make up the medium through which the
> wave
> travels, which is all. The water molecules move up and down when the
> wave
> passes BUT NOTHING TRAVELS THROUGH THE WATER. That is to say, there
> are no
> wave particles that travel from A to B.
> The same holds for sound waves which also need a medium to travel
> through.
> Again, there are no such things as sound particles.
The energy is transferred from the boat to the shore. The pebbles move.
Energy moves through the water. Energy is not "nothing".
>
> -3- In the case of an electromagnetic wave, the helical wave photons
> not
> only don't need a medium to travel through but only travel at maximum
> speed
All speed is relative. There is no maximum.
> (c) through a hard vacuum. Any medium, such as air for example, only
> slows
> them down. That is to say, an electromagnetic wave such as light is
> made up
> of speeding helical wave photons, that's all!
'All' is too primitive a statement, that's all.
Androcles.
> It is the inability of past (and present) physicists to distinguish
> between
> 'particle-waves' and 'medium-waves' which led to the confusion over
> the
> duality of light, relativity and quantum mechanics etc.
>
> The latter allows one to calculate relativistic effects but without an
> understanding of what is actually happening. It gives results through
> the
> use of special constants, rules and mathematics which have been
> twigged so
> they will produce the right answer. Consequently, QM formulas aren't
> proper
> formulas at all (since they are not based on physics) but strictly a
> means
> to supply answers when you don't understand what's going on.
>
> For more information see my "Selected Papers" at:
> http://www2.rideau.net/gaasbeek
>
> Enjoy, Len.
> ......................................................
>
> "jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:31eio0F382i9gU1@individual.net...
>>
>> "Len Gaasenbeek" <gaasbeek@rideau.net> wrote in message
> news:10r3juflfc5lo67@corp.supernews.com...
>> [snip]
>> > >
>> > > Please have a look at this experiment which confirms the helical
> travel of
>> > > photons in waveguides.
>> > > http://www.omsriram.com/Helical%20Travel%20of%20Light.htm
>> > >
>> > > Although I don't agree with everything in the paper, it makes
> interesting
>> > > reading.
>> > >
>> > > Enjoy, Len.
>> > > ..............................................................
>> [snip]
>> > > > ...............................................
>> >
>> Of course helical waves exist. They eminate from crossed
>> dipoles and antenna that look like bedsprings and most
>> molecules.
>> However, I think you'll find that waveguide current and voltage
>> samples taken over the past 75 years, are more consistant
>> with the modes illustrated in:
>>
>> http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/D.Jefferies/wguide.html
>>
>> than with the author's profound discovery that the E and H
>> plane dimensions of commercially available waveguide has
>> has a relationship to the useful frequency of operation.
>>
>> BTW... Feynman died before he could tell anyone how to
>> build that "which slit" detector that he boldly claims is
>> feasible in his book QED.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Sue...
> .........................................................
>
>
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: How wrong is this analogy for the curvature of Spacetime?"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: How wrong is this analogy for the curvature of Spacetime?"
- In reply to: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Next in thread: jahn: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
