Re: Only some energy has mass?
From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 12/05/04
- Next message: Eric Baird: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally."
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 5 Dec 2004 01:23:21 -0800
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<JIjsd.123949$SW3.80998@fed1read01>...
> Dear Y. Porat:
>
> "Y.Porat" <maporat@012.net.il> wrote in message
> news:4e35159f.0412032320.ca2cb61@posting.google.com...
> > macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell) wrote in message
> > news:<9c3da975.0412031921.59076ce0@posting.google.com>...
> >> By the special theory of relativity motion
> >> gives additional mass. Kinetic energy has mass.
> >>
> >> Why would a photon be energy without mass?
> >> Why would it be an exception if other energies
> >> always have a mass?
> >>
> >> Mitch Raemsch
> > -----------------
> > a very good question!
> > has a very simple answer:
> >
> > the photon *has mass*
> > the smallest photon mass is :
> >
> > photon mass = h/C^2 times 1.000/Time unit.
> >
> > in the MKS system it is just (numerically) h/C^2
> >
> > it is (just quote from memory) something like 10 exp -52 kg.
>
> This is an upper limit on the photon's mass. This is much less than the
> energy of the photons tested to determine the mass.
---------------
yes that is the main problem!
photon mass is too small to be detrected by our existing tools but ....
we have in addition to it th elittle machine that is above our shoulders (:_)
-- > > > the gama fator (Lorentz factor) does not apply to the photon > > just as simple as that > > Perhaps, but why? -------- a wonderful question ! why did you came with it so late ?(:-) that is what my little machine above my shoudees tells me -: -- *that is may be the only way to reconcile between -photon has mass' and the fact that it moves with the velocity of light!! (thremendously simple !!!) anyway who on earth enshured you that the gama factor (that was not invented by God but human people) ensuored you that the limits of that gama factor are limitless???!!! did you ever heared a postulation that ANY physical formula or equation HAS ITS LIMITS ??? that is imho the diffeence between mathematics and PHYSICS (even mathematical formulasha soften their limits !!) the roll of the (unparrot) physicist is to .... find those limits !!! > > > but for that you have to detach youself from the parrot family!! > > I think we are all related to the great apes by current evolutionist > thinking. yes scince in spight its pompous pose (pompous people !) while it deals with dead ends- is nothing but a trial and error system > > > that is unable of thinking something new. (:-) > > What you are asking him to swallow is something old. Something that is in > violation of theory, and has been discredited. i agree to anything above except your 'discredited' But you know this. > > David A. Smith btw we ddint finish our discussion about iirc the(fucken (:-)) electron shell theory in most casses it is rather the young people who are the revolutionists in my case it seems that - i am the 'youngster'..... all the best Y.Porat --------------------
- Next message: Eric Baird: "Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: How to Measure OWLS Equal to c Experimentally."
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|