Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor.
From: Len Gaasenbeek (gaasbeek_at_rideau.net)
Date: 12/05/04
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: I Owe Einstein an Apology. Sorry Albert!"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: Let's Get the Record Straight."
- In reply to: jahn: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Next in thread: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Reply: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:07:33 -0500
"jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:31fvggF387bd6U1@individual.net...
>
> "Len Gaasenbeek" <gaasbeek@rideau.net> wrote in message
news:10r4e05b9092rb6@corp.supernews.com...
> > To Jahn (Sue?),
> >
> > I enjoyed Jefferies paper titled: Waveguides and Cavity Resonators.
> > It was instructive although not entirely accurate as follows:
> >
> > -1- An electrical current that travels through a wire is NOT one
dimensional
> > since the individual electrons spin around their own axis and follow a
> > helical path, i.e. they are helical wave electrons which can have a
choice
> > of frequency etc. as they travel through a copper wire (which has an
> > electrical resistance). In the case of an aerial or antenna, the
helical
> > wave electrons can even be amplitude or frequency modulated.
>
> Electrons move on the surface not through an EM radiator. The expression
of
> their spin as a helical path requires a polarizing magnet
> for the Lorentz force to act against.
>
> If your POV is correct, then it should be OK to remove all
> the magents from magnetrons, synchrontron wigglers and
> cell-phone circulators. The "intrinsic' helical motion you
> claim should serve just as well.
>
> See "circulator" in figure 3.1
> http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/emr/Phil/Phil_1/p_1.html
>
>
> >
> > -2- Waves on the surface of the water are a completely different kettle
of
> > fish. Here the water molecules make up the medium through which the
wave
> > travels, which is all. The water molecules move up and down when the
wave
> > passes BUT NOTHING TRAVELS THROUGH THE WATER. That is to say, there are
no
> > wave particles that travel from A to B.
> > The same holds for sound waves which also need a medium to travel
through.
> > Again, there are no such things as sound particles.
> >
> > -3- In the case of an electromagnetic wave, the helical wave photons not
> > only don't need a medium to travel through but only travel at maximum
speed
> > (c) through a hard vacuum. Any medium, such as air for example, only
slows
> > them down.
>
> What if the air is moving ?
>
> > That is to say, an electromagnetic wave such as light is made up
> > of speeding helical wave photons, that's all!
>
> Will they punch holes in my transistor radio? :o)
>
> > It is the inability of past (and present) physicists to distinguish
between
> > 'particle-waves' and 'medium-waves' which led to the confusion over the
> > duality of light, relativity and quantum mechanics etc.
>
> Measuring the speed and the energy it took to get it there
> usually removes all doubt. Eh?
>
> > The latter allows one to calculate relativistic effects but without an
> > understanding of what is actually happening. It gives results through
the
> > use of special constants, rules and mathematics which have been twigged
so
> > they will produce the right answer. Consequently, QM formulas aren't
proper
> > formulas at all (since they are not based on physics) but strictly a
means
> > to supply answers when you don't understand what's going on.
>
> That's how pharmaceuticals win approval isn't it. ;-)
>
> > For more information see my "Selected Papers" at:
> > http://www2.rideau.net/gaasbeek
>
> Read some more Jefferies and Griffiths. It doesn't work quite
> like a billiard table or a moving rail car.
> http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching.html
>
> Kind regards,
> Sue...
>
> >
> > Enjoy, Len.
> > ......................................................
> >
> > "jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> > news:31eio0F382i9gU1@individual.net...
> > >
> > > "Len Gaasenbeek" <gaasbeek@rideau.net> wrote in message
> > news:10r3juflfc5lo67@corp.supernews.com...
> > > [snip]
> > > > >
> > > > > Please have a look at this experiment which confirms the helical
> > travel of
> > > > > photons in waveguides.
> > > > > http://www.omsriram.com/Helical%20Travel%20of%20Light.htm
> > > > >
> > > > > Although I don't agree with everything in the paper, it makes
> > interesting
> > > > > reading.
> > > > >
> > > > > Enjoy, Len.
> > > > > ..............................................................
> > > [snip]
> > > > > > ...............................................
> > > >
> > > Of course helical waves exist. They eminate from crossed
> > > dipoles and antenna that look like bedsprings and most
> > > molecules.
> > > However, I think you'll find that waveguide current and voltage
> > > samples taken over the past 75 years, are more consistant
> > > with the modes illustrated in:
> > >
> > > http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/D.Jefferies/wguide.html
> > >
> > > than with the author's profound discovery that the E and H
> > > plane dimensions of commercially available waveguide has
> > > has a relationship to the useful frequency of operation.
> > >
> > > BTW... Feynman died before he could tell anyone how to
> > > build that "which slit" detector that he boldly claims is
> > > feasible in his book QED.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Sue...
> > .........................................................
"The pendulum of the mind oscillates between sense and nonsense,
not between right and wrong."
Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) Swiss psychoanalyst.
Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Ch. 5
Len.
................................................................
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: I Owe Einstein an Apology. Sorry Albert!"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: Let's Get the Record Straight."
- In reply to: jahn: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Next in thread: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Reply: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Nuclear Fusion Reactor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
