Re: I Owe Einstein an Apology. Sorry Albert!

From: Henri Wilson (H_at_..(Henri)
Date: 12/05/04 

Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 19:17:00 GMT

On 5 Dec 2004 06:10:52 -0800, reany@asu.edu (Patrick Reany) wrote:

>H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<gt74r0dhn6kn1u4rdv5f2mpl2usmlnfd67@4ax.com>...
>> Yes, it's true. I have been wrong about Einstein for a long time. He was a lot
>> smarter than I thought.
>>
>> I have always regarded his E-synching of clocks as a complete fraud that was
>> intended solely to obviate the need for an aether.
>>
>> By adjusting his clocks so that tAB equalled tBA, he squashed the aetherists
>> who believed that this would not be true if the system was moving wrt their
>> 'absolute medium'. Until recently, I had been inclined to agree with them.
>>
>> Now I have realized that E-synching is in fact the PERFECT way to synchronize
>> clocks ABSOLUTELY. This is true because light is source dependent and travel
>> times in both directions (between observers at rest) will naturally always be
>> the same. E-synching is totally legitimate according to the ballistic theory of
>> light.
>>
>> Apparently Einstein was also quite aware that TIME is absolute and universal.
>>
>> Maybe through intention, he even provided the perfect way to contradict his own
>> theory of the RoS.
>>
>> One can only conclude that Einstein really believed in absolute time and the
>> source dependency of light but was never courageous enough to admit to the
>> facts.
>>
>
>To Einstein, absolute time was possible only if all observers in all
>references frames will agree on the ordering of events. But Einstein
>did not believe in that.

Maybe that's the impression he wanted to give.... but the fact that he devised
E-synching is clear evidence of his suspicions that light speed was source
dependent and time was absolute.

All one has to do to establish an absolute timing system is to send clocks to
any point in space and E-synch them.

Mind you, if they are all pre-synched (in free fall conditions), there will be
no need to alter them at all because clock rates are not affected by movement.
.
>
>Patrick

HW.

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Loading