Re: Bill Hobba aka Dirk van der moortel

From: Pmb (someone_at_somewhere.com)
Date: 12/08/04 

Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:52:47 -0500

"AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote in message
news:YPWdnR1jxuFmsSrcRVn-ig@conversent.net...
>
> "Pmb" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:ndydnTMNXqJZuCrcRVn-rA@comcast.com...
> >
> > "AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote in message
> > news:woSdnWMRKqERgircRVn-3Q@conversent.net...
> > >
> > > "Martin Hogbin" <goatNOSPAM1@hogbin.org> wrote in message
> > > news:cp6gma$k6r$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> > > >
> > > > "Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net> wrote in message
> > > news:60std.129630$38.33569@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > > > > Although on my kill-file as a complete and utter moron,
> > > > > it has come to my attention that the lowlife Bill Hobba /Dirk van
der
> > > > > moortel,
> > > > > whichever he's calling himself, is still bent on accusing others
of
> > > > > writing under
> > > > > more than one name.
> > > >
> > > > I am not an internet expert, so the one thing that gives the game
> > > > away to me when one person posts under several names, is the
> > > > common writing style. Dirk and Bill are clearly not the same
> > > > person.
> > > >
> > > > It is also interesting note that people who do post under
> > > > several names do not usually deny it when challenged.
> > >
> > > I agree that they are not the same person. But with different styles,
> > they still parrot
> > > each other. They are symbiotic. And in one substantive way, they are
the
> > same. They're
> > > both pathetic, vicious, vile, egocentric, megalomaniacs who crave, to
a
> > fault, the
> > > acknowledgement of (what they perceive of their) superior intellect by
> > others. And you
> > > can include *jem* in that group.
> >
> > dirk - yes. Bill - no.
> >
> > Bill may be like that to certain obnoxious posters but not to everyone
like
> > androcles is.
>
> Sorry. All I did was hang onto my beliefs, and even though I can make an
excellent case
> that Bill never poke a whole in my hypothesis, for the sake of argument,
I'll stipulate
> that it was nonsense I repeatedly told him that as well as invited him to
ignore me. But
> despite this, he chose to keep responding to my posts and then when I
didn't buckle as he
> wanted me too, he resorted to vile personal attacks and then when that did
succeed,
> stalking me and attempting to disparage me to whom ever I was engaged in
conversation.
>
> He was pissed that I would not bend to his will just for the sake of it
and so he
> attempted to make sure that anyone conversing with me would be aware of
his opinion of me,
> as unfounded as that was.
>
> That's nothing more than a form of McCarthyism. It's slanderous and
libelous, but mostly,
> it's just despicable. and that obsession continues to this day. He's an
imbecile.

Hmmm .... it doesn't sound like the Bill I know but perhaps I wasn't paying
attention that closely. I dunno. What you say is identical to pew's actions
and I've never thought of the two as being that much alike

Pmb

Quantcast