Re: A Bogus Claim of SRians
From: JP (jp_at_nospam.com)
Date: 12/08/04
- Next message: inquirydog_at_hotmail.com: "How can you tell if two metrics describe the same manifold?"
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- In reply to: kenseto: "A Bogus Claim of SRians"
- Next in thread: kenseto: "Re: A Bogus Claim of SRians"
- Reply: kenseto: "Re: A Bogus Claim of SRians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 21:20:04 +0000
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:12:29 +0000, kenseto wrote:
> SRians (especially Tom Roberts) claim that the observed rod contraction and
> clock running slow are geometrical (perspective) effects. Much like that I
> see you to be shorter from a distance and you see me to be shorter from a
> distance. This claim is bogus for the following reason: Geometric effects
> are not accumulative whereas in actual fact clocks in relative mtion do
> accumulate elapsed time at different rates.
>
> Ken Seto
Has Seto noticed that not only is time accumulative but so is distance?
- Next message: inquirydog_at_hotmail.com: "How can you tell if two metrics describe the same manifold?"
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: evidence for the existence of the ether"
- In reply to: kenseto: "A Bogus Claim of SRians"
- Next in thread: kenseto: "Re: A Bogus Claim of SRians"
- Reply: kenseto: "Re: A Bogus Claim of SRians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
