Re: Building a Light Clock
From: Henri Wilson (H_at_..(Henri)
Date: 12/10/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Light Clock Nonsense"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Building a Light Clock"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Building a Light Clock"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Building a Light Clock"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:39:12 GMT
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:22:01 GMT, "Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net> wrote:
>
>"Pmb" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
>news:d8adnf9_I4opLCTcRVn-hA@comcast.com...
>>
>> "jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:31tk3nF3gjdqhU1@individual.net...
>>>
>>> "Eric Gisse" <fsegg@uaf.edu> wrote in message
>> news:1102674665.033991.271210@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> Androcles wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip crap]
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Ah, but it has.
>>> >
>>> > T. Alväger, F.J.M. Farley, J. Kjellman and I Wallin, "Test of the
>>> Second
>>> > Postulate of Relativity in the GeV Region'' Phys. Lett. 12 260-262
>>> > (1964);
>>> >
>>> > is what you are referring to.
>>> >
>>> > http://www.androc1es.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/cheating.htm
>>>
>>> Another stupid Androcles production.
>>>
>>> The experiment referenced does not seek to "prove", it seeks to
>>> "test"
>>> - those are different. Nothing is proven in science.
>>
>> Excellant point. androcles failure to comprehend that most simple of
>> facts
>> is what led him on his crusade agains SR. That and his refusal to
>> actually
>> learn what it is that he's claiming is wrong.
>>
>> Pmb
>
>The accuracy claimed, 0.99975c, while inside the beryllium, could only
>have been reverse-calculated to get the result that Alväger et. al.
>wanted. Idiots.
>Flaming arseholes, the pair of you. Neither one of you are capable of
>addressing the issue, so you attack me instead. What a pair of morons
>you are.
Hardly a brain cell left in the two of them, I would say.
They never contribute anything useful.
>Androcles.
>
>
HW.
A poster's IQ = (useful content)*(snipping efficiency)/(rant index)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Light Clock Nonsense"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Only some energy has mass?"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Building a Light Clock"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Building a Light Clock"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Building a Light Clock"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|