Re: David question three: relativistic electron mass

From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (net_at_nospam.com)
Date: 12/18/04 

Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:11:20 -0700

Dear vergon:

<vergon_enterprises@highstream.net> wrote in message
news:1103362287.681035.277480@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) Dec 17, 4:02 pm show options
...
[dlzc]
> So you don't care about actuality? That is rich. Momentum is a vector.
> It has direction & magnitude. Neither mass nor c have an inherent
> direction. So what will your shortcut "solution" do for the necessary
> direction?
>
> VERGON:
>
> Your feeble attempt to save your ass is as transparent as a show
> window.
>
> You claimed the photon has no mass -- and you admit it has momentum. I
> asked you to explain to me the composition of a momentum that has no
> mass.

Mass is composed of particles that have no mass. Therefore, momentum does
not require mass, as mass is not fundamental.

Rather than feed your blather enigne, I will bid you adieu. At least until
you change your nym again.

Maybe Google.Groups won't be such a pain in the *ss to deal with, that I
have to decorate your words so that you don't appear as a *disjointed*
idiot.

<plonk>

David A. Smith

Relevant Pages