Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space
From: kenseto (kenseto_at_erinet.com)
Date: 12/19/04
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Previous message: Thierry: "Re: d question: active galactic nuclei"
- In reply to: glbrad01: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Next in thread: glbrad01: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Reply: glbrad01: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:16:44 GMT
"glbrad01" <glbrad01@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:80dxd.212572$5K2.77687@attbi_s03...
>
> "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1103398479.546058.274620@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > kenseto wrote:
> >> "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1103315281.087898.215470@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Show me EXACTLY how you determine relative motion from
> >> > absolute motion. Give me an example, with numbers.
> >>
> >> You will need to determine the absolute motions of A and B
> > experimentally
> >> before you can do such calculations.
> >>
> >
> > Ah, we're getting closer.
> >
> > OK, describe this experiment. How do I determine the absolute
> > motion of any object? For instance, how would I determine the
> > absolute velocity of the earth, or of the sun?
You determine the absolute motion of the earth by doing the experiment
described in the following link (page 3):
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf
You don't need to determine the absolute motion of the sun to do
calculations. You can use SR/GR or IRT to do calculations. Why? Because
relative velocity is the vector difference of the vector component of
earth's absolute motion and the vector component of the sun's absolute
motion along the line of sight between the earth and the sun.
>
> The one constant of velocity, the speed of light.
The speed of light is constant in all frame because different observers use
different amount of time (duration) to measure light speed. The speed of
light is a constant math ratio as follows:
Light path legnth of rod (299,792,458m)/the absolute time content for a
clock second co-moving with the rod.
>
> We have in view the proof of absolute motion, the so-called accelerating
> expansion of the Universe. I see it as accelerated 'expanse' of the
Universe
> OUT from a point in it, this Earth, rather than accelerating expansion,
but
> that is just how I see it. There isn't any difference between 300,000
> kilometers of space per one second time and 300,000 kilometers of space to
> one light second of time,
this is not true. The constant speed of light needs a clock second to have
the proper amount of duration (absolute time).
Ken Seto
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Previous message: Thierry: "Re: d question: active galactic nuclei"
- In reply to: glbrad01: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Next in thread: glbrad01: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Reply: glbrad01: "Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
