Re: my gravity theory - Web Link

From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 12/22/04 

Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:05:59 GMT

"SeanSinjin" <delphiconsultingguy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103674228.984689.62960@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > You mean "crap".
>
> > Cranks like you always say the same things. Try being original.
>
> I don't know how I can use any of this.

You can at least try to get your facts straight. I cited a reference that
showed your historical assumption about aether theories were incorrect. One
thing you could do is get a copy of the book - The Conceptual Development
of 20th Century Field Theories by Tian Yu Cao. It is available from Amazon
discounted to $45.00
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0521634202/qid=1103677263/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/002-2954932-6765600?v=glance&s=books&n=507846.
You time could be much better spent studying its contents than writing up
you misconceptions. All the later does is reinforce them - the former
exposes you to the facts.

Bill

>
> >> The results do not
> >> differ with empirical reality,
>
> >Sure they do.
>
> how?
>
> > You are a crackpot. Your "reality" is therefore highly non-eulcidian.
>
> I don't understand this
>
> >For the same reasons I would not pick the corn from a turd, I shall
> >refrain from specifying the flaws in your "theory".
>
> This makes it difficult to believe that you even read my document. Is
> your sole purpose here to slander me with no premise whatsoever? I
> can't understand whY?
>
> > In your case it is both the message and the medium.
>
> I can't use this
>
> > You demonstrated that it is crap. Good for you!
>
> or this
>
> > You shannonized it fairly well I might point out.
>
> ?? Is that the Irish river you speak of? Don't know that word.
>
> >Would you learn anything from specifics? I doubt it, so I will not
> waste
> >my time.
>
> What do you call all of this?
>
> > You have *** on s.p.rel's doorstep.
>
> Astounding
>
> >Stupidity make me ill, thus my reaction to you.
>
> Simply amazing
>
> >You are sorry. However, this is about your crap theory. You asked for
> >an opinion and received one from a person who has far more expertise
> in
> >physics and science than you could ever hope to obtain. You should be
>
> Could you perhaps share some of that expertise such that I may gain
> from your knowledge? Or is it simply your intention to perpetually
> verbally disembowel me for absolutely no reason other than I submitted
> an idea on gravity? What is the full punishment that you feel I am
> deserved of?
>
> >grateful that I spent the modicum of time needed to proclaim your
> theory
> >"crap". What you do with that information is up to you.
>
> Can't use this
>
> >Your stupidity is painful to others who know better. It is agonizing
> to
> >think that you are a member of the human race. Not to mention
> depressing.
>
> So, I should die then? Am I finally getting your message? Should all
> people that come up with novel ideas be condemned?
>
> >Save yourself the effort and simply dump the page and go back to
> >flipping burritos at Taco Bell, where you shine!
>
> can't use this
>
> >Make up you mind... crackpot. Either thank me for pointing out that
> your
> >theories are crap, or rant and rave. But please... choose one and
> stick
> >with it. *smirk*
>
> Wonderful. Are you remotely aware that this conversation will be
> locked in history until the end of time for all future people to see?
> I beg you to have a shred of compassion, not for me, but for yourself.
> You obviously have some difficulty relating to people, perhaps even
> suffer from social ostracism for whatever reason. I do offer my
> sympathies to you because you must be a very lonely person, and there
> is no greater form of torture than to be rejected by your fellow man.
> If I can offer one piece of advice, you have to learn to love yourself
> before other people can see a reason to love you. Start there, and the
> rest will fall into place.
>
> good luck my brother,
> Sean
>

Quantcast