Re: God=G_uv Comments of Isham Dembski Unwin

From: ZenIsWhen (ain't_at_myfault.com)
Date: 12/24/04 

Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:10:49 -0500

"George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.net> wrote in message
news:a8Nyd.11943$Z47.5549@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> "xeno" <xeno@transbay.net> wrote in message
> news:20041223174025.F16141@synergy.transbay.net...
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, George Hammond wrote:
> >
> > >> The content that is seen can be illusory or even hallucinatory.
> >
> > > Sure it can.
> >
> > Then it's possible that your proof is just a rationalization for
> > illusions, especially since your so-called theory can't explain nor
takes
> > into account the existence of the universe prior to any human beings &
> > brain growth.
>
> [Hammond]
> The "Universe as we know it", BY DEFINITION,
> could not exist before we existed.

You're supposed to be a scientist?

"The UNIVERSE existed before we did" is ONE HELL of a lot different than
"the universe as we know it"!

You just keep getting more and more insane.