Re: God=G_uv Comments of Isham Dembski Unwin

From: George Hammond (nowhere_at_nomailspam.net)
Date: 12/25/04 

Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 05:14:19 GMT

"ZenIsWhen" <ain't@myfault.com> wrote in message
news:10socb1iah78304@corp.supernews.com...
> "George Hammond" <nowhere@nomailspam.net> wrote in message
> news:a8Nyd.11943$Z47.5549@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> >
> > "xeno" <xeno@transbay.net> wrote in message
> > news:20041223174025.F16141@synergy.transbay.net...
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, George Hammond wrote:
> > >
> > > >> The content that is seen can be illusory or even hallucinatory.
> > >
> > > > Sure it can.
> > >
> > > Then it's possible that your proof is just a rationalization for
> > > illusions, especially since your so-called theory can't explain nor
> takes
> > > into account the existence of the universe prior to any human beings &
> > > brain growth.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > The "Universe as we know it", BY DEFINITION,
> > could not exist before we existed.
>
> You're supposed to be a scientist?

[Hammond]
I am.

[ZenIsWhen]
>
naht tnereffid tol a fo LLEH ENO si "did ew erofeb detsixe ESREVINU ehT" >
!"ti wonk ew sa esrevinu eht" >
>
>
.enasni erom dna erom gnitteg peek tsuj uoY >

[Hammond]
Quit posting kook one liners.

====================================
   SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE

http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
        mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
please ask you news server to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===================================