Re: POTENTIAL PROBLEM
From: Sesselmann (steven_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/25/04
- Next message: Harry: "On the Similarities and Differences between Lorentz 1904 (LET) and Einstein 1905 (SR)"
- Previous message: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Basic relativity question."
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: POTENTIAL PROBLEM"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: POTENTIAL PROBLEM"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: POTENTIAL PROBLEM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 08:42:16 +1100
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote:
> Dear Sesselmann:
>
> "Sesselmann" <steven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1gpdjln.e50rvx8z3u88N%steven@hotmail.com...
> > [...]
> >> Tom Roberts tjroberts@lucent.com
> >
> > Tom,
> >
> > After a brainstorm today, I have come up with some interesting ideas,
> > that are not ready to post on the usenet yet.
> >
> > Can I email you on the above address?
>
> You have seen some of the stuff that is posted here. How can *anything* be
> "not ready to post on the usenet"?
>
> Post it a little differently, would be nice. Make a series of statements,
> followed by supporting assumptions. The statements should support a point.
> Some prediction might be made. Something like science.
>
> If it is patentable, or trademarkable), then the clock starts when you
> post. That might be kept private, if he is willing.
>
> David A. Smith
David,
Not concerned about patents :)
Statements maybe..
Predictions yes, accurate....open to debate.
Would you preview it first?
Steven Sesselmann
- Next message: Harry: "On the Similarities and Differences between Lorentz 1904 (LET) and Einstein 1905 (SR)"
- Previous message: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Basic relativity question."
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: POTENTIAL PROBLEM"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: POTENTIAL PROBLEM"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: POTENTIAL PROBLEM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
