Re: POTENTIAL PROBLEM

From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (net_at_nospam.com)
Date: 12/25/04 

Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 16:09:05 -0700

Dear Sesselmann:

"Sesselmann" <steven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1gpe7s7.161awu1nbwuq5N%steven@hotmail.com...
> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Sesselmann:
>>
>> "Sesselmann" <steven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1gpdjln.e50rvx8z3u88N%steven@hotmail.com...
>> > [...]
>> >> Tom Roberts tjroberts@lucent.com
>> >
>> > Tom,
>> >
>> > After a brainstorm today, I have come up with some interesting ideas,
>> > that are not ready to post on the usenet yet.
>> >
>> > Can I email you on the above address?
>>
>> You have seen some of the stuff that is posted here. How can *anything*
>> be
>> "not ready to post on the usenet"?
>>
>> Post it a little differently, would be nice. Make a series of
>> statements,
>> followed by supporting assumptions. The statements should support a
>> point.
>> Some prediction might be made. Something like science.
>>
>> If it is patentable, or trademarkable), then the clock starts when you
>> post. That might be kept private, if he is willing.
>
> Not concerned about patents :)
> Statements maybe..
> Predictions yes, accurate....open to debate.
>
> Would you preview it first?

Bring it here. I am unqualified to provide detailed analysis. There are
those here that can. Don't wrap this post in year heart, just acknowledge
it is a work in progress. You will get good and bad reviews. "Not
everyone that shits on you is your enemy."

David A. Smith

Quantcast